You know what's more lame than "caring about auto-squelch"? It's "caring about other people caring about auto-squelch" .
Only surpassed by caring about other people caring about other people caring about autosquelch?
Back to the discussion:
1) An autosquelch feature would benefit me and many other people asking for it.
2) Autosquelch would not take anything AWAY from the game - because manual squelch already exists.
1) + 2) implies that implementing autosquelch would raise the overall enjoyment/satisfaction level for the player base on average ... it could only be positive.
Therefore anybody arguing against is either trolling, would prefer to see fewer people playing the game, or is a bit too stupid to understand the logic of the argument.
Which is it?
Think most are asking why its needed instead of we dont need it. If they implimented it nobody would care that doesnt use ut
If they really didn't care, they wouldn't come in here to insult people who want it.
1
Tech cards suck for ladder or any other best of 1 modes.
1
If they really didn't care, they wouldn't come in here to insult people who want it.
2
Nope
1
I was interested in the game till I saw it was riddled with needless RNG.
3
You know what's more lame than "caring about auto-squelch"? It's "caring about other people caring about auto-squelch" .
4
Because this is a heathstone forum, remember when Gnomeferatu was revealed and people where going on about how it was too OP?
0
As the previous poster mentioned this card could be playable, but in-order for it to be playable the meta would have to terribly boring.
1
They should at least have rush if not just straight up have their stats upgraded.
12
Rafaam's scheme looks terrible.