Absolutely disagree. You can't improve the game by preventing people from getting access to information. If people want to find the best decks and they don't get the information they want here, all that traffic will go to another site instead, so who really wins in that scenario?
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
4
Without silence you can't stop Anub'arak. Some cards you'd just win. How does do you deal with Tirion efficiently? What happens when they have 3 big things you just lose. You'd need to run Abusive Sargent and BGH in every deck. Need to ping shield, deal six damage, and deal with a 5/3 weapon. Some classes can't deal with it.
9
Be glad they did free packs at all when Brawl came out.
2
A crappier Pit Lord with delayed face damage.
1
Cost too much.
1
A 2/2 weapon would be better. The 3rd durability is a liability. Chances are you are going to swap weapons before durabilty runs out. Would you ever play this not on turn 1? Fireball does 12, Steady Shot does 4.
3
Brawl is amazing. Playing with someone with a brain is important. I don't mean don' make mistakes. I mean don't buff a card to high heaven on an empty board when you can't attack with it. It's a pretty simple combo game. Too many people are playing stuff the early.
1
First was a golden Lorewalker Cho.
1
Abusive Sargent and Dark Iron Dwarf are used to trade up. Giving a permanent +2 isn't much better than temp one. The body is what makes it bad.
2
Demonfire is not even played and it is better.
EDIT: People keep saying 6/5 Imp turn 2. Fine turn 2 for you but your opponent will be a turn, or 2 with the coin, ahead.