Hearthpwn

I suppose a small indie company could add more holiday events. Maybe even spice it up every year so they are slightly different.

If it's on top lets complain until it gets nerfed. Then the next deck that rises to the top lets complain until it gets nerfed. Rinse and repeat. Hearthstone players are too predictable at this point.

Spoiler: It doesn't matter what they nerf. You will always play those tier 1 decks.

I liked it when there were adventures. The cost was fairly inexpensive and gave every card. Every week the meta would evolve slowly as new wings were released. It was nice to get a break from purchasing so many packs to get a decent collection. Probably the main reason they don't do them anymore. $.$

Quote from YourPrivateNightmare >>

Quote from CylonToaster >>

Jade druid is stronger because the counter decks were nerfed. No need for Spreading Plague because the aggro decks that were able to beat jade are now nerfed. The only opposition to jade now is jade (lol) or priest. So the obvious choice would be to replace the 4 cards with some big drops. Grab your coffee because this is going to be a slow ResidentSleeper meta.

 I don't recall Hunter getting nerfed

Enjoy playing against jade druid and priest for another year. Decks that stood a chance like midrange murloc paladin, pirate warrior and aggro druid got gutted. Heck even shaman got destroyed because of hex and it was not performing well in this meta... Blizzard logic.

Quote from Slydie >>

Quote from CylonToaster >>

It's hard to explain but after playing for years you start to notice the game tries to pull you back when you go on win streaks. You start facing counter decks and mulligans seem to get worse. I always compare it to arena, the more you win in a row the harder it becomes. Whenever i go on a massive win streak i just call it a day. This method has worked best for me whenever i rank up. A theory is trying to keep worse players more equalized so they stick around longer. Reducing the skill gap can be beneficial because it makes the majority feel special. Things are very random for a reason, but i would never count out the possibility things are rigged to a point as well.

 Consider this logic.

-Why are you on a winstreak in the first place? Did you get some lucky draws or good matchups? Are those likely to continue forever?

-When going on a long streak, probably with a good deck, playing well, how is it most likely that you eventually lose? (How about a lucky draw or a counterdeck...)

Your observation proves absolutley nothing about the system, this is the very nature of random matchmaking. Good luck trying to prove any of it. There is no proof here whatsoever.

My greetings.

I preferred the double Innervate into Bittertide Hydra on turn 1. The only downside was waiting for the game to end because they quit out of the client.

This is a very positive change and should never be reintroduced. The days of getting synergy cards like Frost Lich Jaina in your first 2 picks will finally be over.

Really lame rewards compared to the Overwatch rewards or Tyrande. I wouldn't feel too left out if you can't get Prime this month.

Having bonus stars for Win streaks allows for people with 50% win rates to get to legend. Every so often you'll get an undeserved extra star at 50% win rate.  Having no bonus stars under rank 5 ensures that the only people getting in to legend are those that have a higher than 50% win rate. 

Makes sense to me. 

ill still play secretdin. haters gonna hate 

Yes, adding in an  unreliable mechanic to search for cards that replace a synergized, curved deck into a random mess of legendaries (many terrible) with no synergy, removal, buffs, or burn, all while simultaneously removing your primary win condition in order to reach this point sounds like a fantastic idea.  

Fun idea for casual though.

Fearsome Doomguard. Dat silly face... OMG...