Wow this deck seems pretty solid! I mean, the Shudderwock should eliminate every obstacle between you and your opponent's face.. atleast in theory and it's pretty nice! I'm gonna try it out tonight
Your device acts as a Client, and not the server (which is Blizzard's end) - all calculations such as pity timers, etc - run on the server side. This is essential to prevent being able to hack the client and cheat your way to getting specific cards / altering data, etc. It therefore is logical that it should make absolutely no difference which device you are using since they all utilise the same code that is triggered on the server side.
This is also why you are able to disconnect and re-connect to a game without the game being lost (assuming you reconnect within the time limit).
You are wrong in your own argument: Server receives the information about what shop is being used to buy the packs. I personally think it might be happening but the odds are ~5-10% worse max, but still a conspiracy theory. (though if they consider that mobile requires extra Developers' time thus expenses - they could implement it)
The OPs question was about which devices packs were being opened on, not which shop they were bought from. The answer was to explain that the device bears no effect upon the outcome of a pack opening, because if it did then it would be susceptible to hacking.
As an IT technician, Scorpyon was right all along. That's the pretty basic flow of information between clients and server. It's all around request/response architecture, which is VERY important in terms of security. You won't ever have the possibility to alter data on their server if not via SQL injections or other hacking methods, so no, the odds are the very same on each different clients. I mean, we're talking about cospiracy, but they COULD have set a different % value for a specific type of device using the client but it's VERY unlikely, cuz illegal.
I dunno if I made myself clear, my English is poor, sorry.. the quick recap is: if you believe men never got to the moon and 9/11 was calculated, then you can believe there's something about clients. Otherwise, no, don't bother think like that.
ABSOLUTELY meta-defining. It's good for Control Shaman and Murloc Shaman (Face turn + new murlocs maybe some with charge, could easily be a lethal turn 6 against particularly slow decks). This card will be played A LOT, that's for sure!
yeah i kinda just got lucky those games and got hyped.. as i wrote in the comments i admit it's not working :C I'd loved a Thicc Shaman archetype tho :sigh: thanks for trying it out! ^_^
Dude i've been playing this deck for a while and damn, i'm telling the truth, this is SO FUN. My heart goes fucking crazy everytime i get every combo pieces! just ended a game on my brand new phone (managed to get a 31 atk mech and kill the opponent), checked my fit band.. 131bpm! HAHAAH that's SO EXCITING!!!
2
Damn dude that's a NICE card, I'd instacraft it if it was real! I like the concept and all the possibilities :) gz!
0
Found 2 more legendaries in the 3 packs from quest. Armagedillo and Elise. Damn the luck! :O
So a total of 4 legs in 12 packs.
0
Wow this deck seems pretty solid! I mean, the Shudderwock should eliminate every obstacle between you and your opponent's face.. atleast in theory and it's pretty nice! I'm gonna try it out tonight
0
10 Packs 2 legendaries one of which I REALLY WANTED. The other one is Octasari pretty meh imho...
Also i crafted golden Zephrys before opening packs!
0
As an IT technician, Scorpyon was right all along. That's the pretty basic flow of information between clients and server. It's all around request/response architecture, which is VERY important in terms of security. You won't ever have the possibility to alter data on their server if not via SQL injections or other hacking methods, so no, the odds are the very same on each different clients. I mean, we're talking about cospiracy, but they COULD have set a different % value for a specific type of device using the client but it's VERY unlikely, cuz illegal.
I dunno if I made myself clear, my English is poor, sorry.. the quick recap is: if you believe men never got to the moon and 9/11 was calculated, then you can believe there's something about clients. Otherwise, no, don't bother think like that.
0
It kinda happens all the time. We're trash indeed.
0
Three balls, Three wishes, Three Cards to discover. That's it.
0
^^'
-8
edit: uhm, i tried to think as a zoo player or some shit like that (which i'm really not thank god) and nvm, Pandahero123 is right :) dumb idea
edit2: SO RUDE. This community is way too salty, I apology, why keeping the neg votes?
0
28 minutes with rush warrior while playing Teamfight Tactics.
OT: Sadly i finished 4th on TFT.....
0
ABSOLUTELY meta-defining. It's good for Control Shaman and Murloc Shaman (Face turn + new murlocs maybe some with charge, could easily be a lethal turn 6 against particularly slow decks). This card will be played A LOT, that's for sure!
0
yeah i kinda just got lucky those games and got hyped.. as i wrote in the comments i admit it's not working :C I'd loved a Thicc Shaman archetype tho :sigh: thanks for trying it out! ^_^
1
you're joking, right? ever heard of Murlocs? Lackeys? this card is BROKEN.
4
Is this a Nightmare before Christmas reference? :OOOO
3
Dude i've been playing this deck for a while and damn, i'm telling the truth, this is SO FUN. My heart goes fucking crazy everytime i get every combo pieces! just ended a game on my brand new phone (managed to get a 31 atk mech and kill the opponent), checked my fit band.. 131bpm! HAHAAH that's SO EXCITING!!!