• 0

    posted a message on Sigma's Wing 3 Card Analysis - The League of Explorers, Ben Brode on Gorillabot's Text, Win a 3D Printed Custom Card

    You might be right - I am not a native English speaker, so I can't really say which is more grammatically and logically clear, but I see your point - for a new player "if you have" could be misleading as it does not specify board or hand. But on the other hand neither does "if you control". For me personally "if you control" doesn't ring much of a bell. So perhaps we need a third alternative :) 

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Sigma's Wing 3 Card Analysis - The League of Explorers, Ben Brode on Gorillabot's Text, Win a 3D Printed Custom Card

    I prefer "If you have" vs. "if you control". 

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Decks Assemble! - Tavern Brawl #25

    This is absolutely frustrating!

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • 1

    posted a message on Chieftain Scarvash Heroic

    Sorry, but this deck is not good. If you have ever managed to beat the boss with it, it was an insane strike of luck and nothing else. There are so many problems with this deck... Not enough big clear (crackle works better than your current spells), not enough damage to finish him off, no card draws, nothing. I tried more than 15 times and was never even close to killing him and I definitely don't suck at Hearthstone (I finish each season within rank 1-5). 

    I gut frustrated and then tried the Hunter deck posted here (I don't have Molten Giants so I did not want the Warrior or Warlock builds) and I won at my first try. Just to be sure that I will not be flaming you I then did 5 more tries with the hunter deck winning in 4/5 games... So to anyone who wants to kill this boss and not have to do 30+ retries with no result, I would recommend the hunter deck. 

    Posted in: Chieftain Scarvash Heroic
  • 0

    posted a message on A bug with manually editting collection.

    I see where you are coming from and I guess there would be such people who would do that, although for me personally it's totally pointless. Thanks.

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 0

    posted a message on A bug with manually editting collection.

    Hm, I think that's stupid. I don't feel comfortable of having to install an app that tracks my activity and scans both my PC and Phone for who knows what. 

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 0

    posted a message on A bug with manually editting collection.

    Hi Molster, 

    Thanks for your update. It appears to be working properly now. I have ran into another issue however - the forum/site achievements related to your collection are not triggered even though I have the cards needed. For example I have the full Naxxramas and BRM sets, but I have not received the achievement.

    I have manually added my collection, if that matters, and I hope these are not intentionally just for Innkeeper users. 

    Kind regards,

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 0

    posted a message on A bug with manually editting collection.

    No one knows. It looks like Hearthpwn staff don't really care abou it not working - they have not shown any intentions of fixing it (it has been a week now) and no one from their staff even replies to what is supposed to be a "hot" "support" topic. Getting really low marks on customer care here.

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 0

    posted a message on A bug with manually editting collection.

    Hello, this is still not working properly. I have the same issue - I add cards to my collection, then click Save and the cards appear, but if I go on to add other cards, then what previously had appeared is now reset and gone again... It is not a matter of timing, because I added all the cards from my full collection (all classes + neutral) LAST NIGHT and TODAY (approximately 9 hours later) I only have Druid, Mage and Neutrals and whatever I do I can't get my cards to show there. 

    So now Inkeeper is totally screwed and not working and also the manual option is not working - nice... 

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 10

    posted a message on Deathattle

    Lock and Load seems like it would be a good card for this deck? 

    Posted in: Deathattle
  • 2

    posted a message on [Heroic] Temple Escape (+VIDEO)

    One shot - one kill! Thanks!

    Posted in: [Heroic] Temple Escape (+VIDEO)
  • 0

    posted a message on heroic sun raider phaerix

    Great deck! I got an insta-wn at 1st try! And I didn't have a good start at all. No SW:P, no silence, but I got Deathlord, Light of Naaru, Nortshire, Inner Fire and Divine Spirit so I played my cards well, buffed my Deathlord and killed the rod, then did Light of Naaru and Divine Spirit on him. Eventually got the SW:P (still no silence for the whole game) so I kept it and when he got the rod back I got it for me immediately. Kept healing DL while LW was beefing up so after that was a matter of 2 turn to finish him off. Great stuff, thanks! 

    Posted in: heroic sun raider phaerix
  • 0

    posted a message on [Heroic Zinaar] Flamewaker Mage

    Good deck, working great. Got it with my second try, cause first game I didn't get a single flamewaker until turn 9... So basically when you have them it's one-shot. Thanks!

    Posted in: [Heroic Zinaar] Flamewaker Mage
  • 0

    posted a message on How are you buying the new adventure? Gold or Cash?

    Gold. I have plenty of it and I don't think it sane to be spending real money for pixels. There are people starving, only a first-world-consumer-retard would spend money on pixels instead of donating

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on The League of Explorers - A Hearthstone Adventure

     I think this time Blizzard have done a good job. Fewer, but more well-thought cards plus a new mechanic. I really expected this to be more towards Christmas and to be heavily advertised for pre-purchase, so I'm almost sure they will release something before the holidays as well. 

    Posted in: Guides
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.