Hearthpwn

Someone told me about the recent nerf so i visited this forum again ( haven't played hearthstone in 6 months ) , incompetent balancing team , nerf the base identity cards , keep the expansion cards strong . 

Glad i ditched this mess of a game , feel bad for 100 euros i spent on it 

People are making the assumption that you're going to empty your hand by turn 5 when you're playing hunter and your only options is playing 2 1 mana cards orSavannah Highmane . That's not how it works in midrange hunter , sure your optimal play is Highmane , but sometimes you have to saturate your mana using what you have in your hand , and 1 mana minions are excellent to do that , 

You can also runHoundmaster + 1 mana beasts to garantee an alternative decent turn 6 to Highmane 

why not make it a 4 charge weapon ? i wanted a nerf to some shaman cards but this looks more like a murder

the only 4 drop i would keep is the shredder if i started second in your deck , or any other if i got a curve before it . i would keep anything playable early game but maybe the elven archer . Having a 2 2 that might trade with his 3 2 is better than not having anything at all 

when we are talking about racism in Say american society my first biggest issues are the racist Justice and prison system , with higher minorities sentencing and laws that were specifically designed to target them ( the drug war itself check for Nixon quotes ) , lack of spending in their communities  , and lower prospect of employment (same resume with a black name has less chance of being accepted )  resulting in poverty and lower chance of social mobility .

And then there  are people who questions the lack of black characters in a video game made by a polish Dev team (the witcher 3 ) , protest a game that have 2 white protagonist shooting black people ( Resident evil 5 ) . But hey that's the difference between serious people about the issue , and comfortable Black people whining about representation and want token characters in a video game 

we had several ''conditional'' 1 mana cards , let's be honestTwilight Whelp orCogmaster are always activated , Flame imp drawback doesn't really affect Zoolock , in the same way thatZombie Chow drawback doesn't matter if you're going to play the control game  and we always had the growingMana Wyrm and Blizzard is totally fine with Tunnel Trogg for over 2 years .It seems like unfair 1 mana In synergy Decks are something totally fine design wise in this game . 

What really broke the game is the combination of Small-Time Buccaneer , other aggressive tools available , mainly cheap weapons being super efficient in this game especially when you're aggressive player ( your health loss means nothing if you're on the attack ) . and Of course .Patches the Pirate 

we end up with 3 2 1 mana +  1 mana  1 1 charge , and this somehow was approved by  a very competent Hearthstone Balance team , i have seen better balanced fan made cards 

I do have to admit that patches is a cool legendary design wise , but this combination HAS to be broken down and nerfed , even for other aggro decks sake , (and ofc midrange decks) . And i thinkSmall-Time Buccaneer have to take the hit for Patches 

why not make arena a rotating set experience ? here is a suggestion

Give classic set 3

Adventures set 1 

Full expansion 2 

then we get a randomized (let's say 6 ) size arena pool each month ( 2 adventure set 2 expansion or instance , all adventures set classic next month for example ) 

look how the goal post changed from it's fine control decks will adapt ! to fuck control warrior , let it die so what ! . 

I LOL'd a bit.

Invoking lack of heterogeneity in a game that features such a multitude of sentient races as orcs, trolls, tauren, elves, dwarves, gnomes, gnolls, demons, mok'nathal, draenei, pandaren and naga (and still i'm probably forgetting some) seems a bit moot. Racism issues are deeply ingrained in the game, you just fail to see it because you're only looking for humans of different hues.

Whether or not the Warcraft games tackles racism well can definitely be debated, though. But really, as long as Hearthstone doesn't directly propagate racism, I think they're in the clear.

Quote from donkeymaybe >>

Winning 60% of your games is great..I don't see what the problem is. 

Quote from Vaestmannaeyjar >>

The things you quote require elementary-level mathematics knowledge. I wouldn't want to study in your university if you're still at that level. Because anyone somewhat serious about statistics will tell you that pulling 4 exemples out of millions of players to imply a law on random draws isn't math, it's stupidity.

Hating on a post without the background to understand it makes you look really bad.

Part of studying probabilities is sampling. You need to be able to calculate how big a sample needs to be in order to draw safe conclusions from it.
What the OP says is that the samples from E. R. Kjellgren and HearthSim are big enough to be taken seriously, while the smaller samples like Amaz don't really tell us much on their own.

Sergeant definitely needed a nerf, but this is arguably the wrong one.

The right nerf was on the bonus given.

With 1/1 +2 it will stay staple in any aggressive deck.

Quote from ChrisKnight >>

Quote from Asylum_Rhapsody >>

Quote from Aether_lackey >>

After the release of this card I urge mods to add another option on the "what do you think about this card" poll. I need a "This cards makes me want to quit hearthstone" option.

How can anyone not see that this card being added to the hunter class is a #$%# mockery. Here's a life fact for ya: HUNTERS WILL NEVER HAVE A GOOD CONTROL DECK. Why? Well, have you seen the hero power? #%@*, have you played the game long enough to be bored just about the sufficient amount to start doing science? The moment you go just a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiitle bit into less aggressive midrange territory, BAM! Your deck sucks.

How the flying @#$& do you expect to play a FIVE MANA 3/5 and still win that game, as a hunter? Because 

YOU DON'T

This is just YET ANOTHER Shadowbomber, a card that makes ZERO sense in the class they are in, and will NEVER see play in any remotely competitive deck. In other words: a waste of time, space in the collection and ultimately your money. This is lazy and uninteresting  design, this is an insult to the player base, this is them saying "yes, we will print this and you will buy packs, and this turd is going to be in some of them, sometimes even golden, so you can love it and keep it forever in your collection as a token to remember how pointless your life is"... okay, I got a little bit carried away there, but you get the point.

Why not make this as a paladin card? Hell, maybe even rogues could have better uses for getting rid of 2 dead cards and that 3/5 body. But no, make it a #@#&* hunter card.  

Bro, I think you might wanna take a step back and chill for a minute. It's not like non-aggro Hunter isn't perfectly theoretically viable. It just hasn't happened yet. If you're biggest concern is the Hero Power, then just look at Warrior. Armor Up is absolute crap for aggro, and yet considering what you picked for your avatar, I'm sure you know aggro Warrior is doing fine.

 He dosen't need to step back and chill for a minute. People needs to use their brains and every single person in this forum needs to realise how BAD this cards. Blizzard NEEDS to fucking pull their shit together and do something real about their card game, people is already tired of getting ripped of expansion after expansion with the game they used to love. This card is a savage insult to any Hunter played that wanted a Tempo/control build.

Also.. You play aggro Warrior cuz of WEAPONS... The best weapons in the game, they go face, and u need to put a fucking oze or harrison to interact with them, a dead card in many other matches, that's why... u cannot use them a defense, it's completly normal to be raging about this card, they're spitting on us and 30% of you are fine with it.

Quote from Tze >>

Quote from I_am_a_r3b3l >>

This card is a sleeper. Drawing cards is very strong, especially specific cards (look at curator). I think this will see play in a more midrange hunter type. Never underestimate the power of drawing cards...

 I'm not disagreeing with you that a tutor on a stick is cool... but drawing 1-drops on turn 5 seems underwhelming. I can see the argument this at least thins your deck out so you have better topdecks (topdecking Alleycat is absolutely awful that late in the game), but I'm not sure you're really winning if you're filling your hand with low-value drops and the stats for the mana aren't great.

I've put it as playable because I do think there's a niche this fits in, but it's pretty borderline bad to me. I'm curious if there's something cool yet to be announced that will make this look more appealing, I think it's at least a very neat design.

That was what they meant with free packs.

Maybe now the 4/3 play a secret free see some play.

Explore Rank 25