And I pay wild exclusively, I think in the last month I've only encountered 2 Raza priest decks...
Is this deck really that problematic in ladder?
I mean according to HS replay it's just 1 of 17 tier 2 decks and is only considered better than GalaRog and Bombwar.
No offense but I’m guessing you don’t play at legend. Razakus is the deck I keep coming back to as it’s pretty much the only viable control deck (and I never play aggro/face), and I face a lot of them (with or without Dragons).
This is the beauty of this game, it brings the best out of people (on top of being the most rewarding and generous game ever, besides Russian roulette of course).
This is a very interesting idea. Like others said, the specific mechanics (or at least predominant ones) are already there, so it’s a good thing that classes in Hs have a clear personality. But I’d like them to be even more pronounced, and I can’t wait for the day we’ll be able to play multi-classed decks on the ladder (or maybe a specific one). Yes it will be a mess at first, and a lot of adjustments will have to be made, but I also don’t see it not happening ever. MTG went from only single-color cards (not counting artefacts) all the way to five-colors cards. There’s a lot of room for experimentation (and Hs already has bi- and tri-class cards).
I didn’t say that control priest is a “problem” for your deck, I’m saying that similar decks haven’t been a problem for “my” control priest. That you are 12-1 doesn’t mean that all players pilot it like you do.
I really don’t understand the buzz around this archetype, sure it’s good but control priest doesn’t have much trouble against it (and Anduin often counters Loatheb).
What percentage of the people complaining, purchase bundles regularly? Just curious, because someone mentioned something about "customers" having the right to complain, and it made me chuckle a bit.
"Washrooms are for customers only"
Feels like people are complaining about there being no toilet paper when they don't even plan on buying a coffee.
I’m a whale and I complain, not because I feel entitled but because this game relies on gambling, I’m addicted to it, and I don’t have Stockholm syndrome.
Take even a 5 minutes break after too many losses. Don’t worry about the end of the month, you still have time to drink a glass of water.
We all have « beliefs » regarding the matchmaking, but you may notice that even this short break will kinda change the nature of your opponents, at least for a few games. You may also notice that there are times of the day when you have a better win rate. Stick to those if you can, and like everyone else said, stick to your deck. It also helps if you trust/enjoy your deck. It may also be time to use a deck tracker and play on a computer instead of a mobile, if that’s your case. The help it provide may be enough to win the one game that your break to legend depends on. Also at D1 (sometimes earlier) you may face low-legend players playing goofy decks (I’m one, when I’m not tired of losing), so against them keep an open mind and don’t be on autopilot, they may not be playing the same 5 netdecks diamond players are (especially at this point).
0
Standard I’m guessing, but I’ll answer anyway.
0
What a waste of Internet space. Are you playing a Gibberling deck by any chance?
0
No offense but I’m guessing you don’t play at legend. Razakus is the deck I keep coming back to as it’s pretty much the only viable control deck (and I never play aggro/face), and I face a lot of them (with or without Dragons).
0
Yes. At legend my only losses are against aggro Druid (when they’re lucky), and mirrors.
0
This is the beauty of this game, it brings the best out of people (on top of being the most rewarding and generous game ever, besides Russian roulette of course).
0
This is a very interesting idea. Like others said, the specific mechanics (or at least predominant ones) are already there, so it’s a good thing that classes in Hs have a clear personality. But I’d like them to be even more pronounced, and I can’t wait for the day we’ll be able to play multi-classed decks on the ladder (or maybe a specific one). Yes it will be a mess at first, and a lot of adjustments will have to be made, but I also don’t see it not happening ever. MTG went from only single-color cards (not counting artefacts) all the way to five-colors cards. There’s a lot of room for experimentation (and Hs already has bi- and tri-class cards).
-6
I didn’t say that control priest is a “problem” for your deck, I’m saying that similar decks haven’t been a problem for “my” control priest. That you are 12-1 doesn’t mean that all players pilot it like you do.
3
There’s no more value to card backs than to cards. When Blizz shuts down the servers, we’ll sell our collections to buy some MTG cards. No wait.
-1
I really don’t understand the buzz around this archetype, sure it’s good but control priest doesn’t have much trouble against it (and Anduin often counters Loatheb).
1
I’m a whale and I complain, not because I feel entitled but because this game relies on gambling, I’m addicted to it, and I don’t have Stockholm syndrome.
0
Doesn’t change much about Illucia, which is fine, I love the card.
1
Take even a 5 minutes break after too many losses. Don’t worry about the end of the month, you still have time to drink a glass of water.
We all have « beliefs » regarding the matchmaking, but you may notice that even this short break will kinda change the nature of your opponents, at least for a few games. You may also notice that there are times of the day when you have a better win rate. Stick to those if you can, and like everyone else said, stick to your deck. It also helps if you trust/enjoy your deck. It may also be time to use a deck tracker and play on a computer instead of a mobile, if that’s your case. The help it provide may be enough to win the one game that your break to legend depends on. Also at D1 (sometimes earlier) you may face low-legend players playing goofy decks (I’m one, when I’m not tired of losing), so against them keep an open mind and don’t be on autopilot, they may not be playing the same 5 netdecks diamond players are (especially at this point).
1
1
Just you.
0
Ranks please?