Why is this even a question? Hunter has beast synergy cards since day one. It's how the class was designed in the first place. Most of their cards have synergies with beasts. Druid got some beast synergistic cards very recently, and none of them are even viable.
Hunter. Such an amazing class with great class cards. Too bad face hunter exists and that's what everyone talks about. It ruined the class' reputation.
It's difficult to play a hunter or a mage deck without scientist. That's means you have to play the secrets manually, that's means sometimes you should keep them in your starting hand, which is not a good move.
Acidmaw is the only bad one, the rest are good but not used.
King Krush: excellent game finisher like grom, but he's too expensive to play in a hunter deck.
Gahz'rilla: see King Krush.
Dreadscale: this is the ultimate early game card for control decks. Warriors would kill for this. It's an excellent, cheap card even for hunters. It's just that control hunter isn't a thing yet, so that's why we don't see dreadscale a lot. Someone told me that he used it in a midrange deck it was really useful.
Acidmaw: terrible, just terrible. If you're not a collector, I'd say disenchant it. It's just so expensive and has very terrible stats with an effect that could cause YOU to lose the game. If his effect could only affect enemy minions, he'd be 100% better and people would actually play it, but the thing we got is terrible, such wasted potential.
3
Hunter's the worst class? What? Are you sure you're playing HS?
0
3 mana hunter secret. What the...?
0
I say mid Feb.
1
The sheep you get from polymorph is a beast. The card you get from imprisonment is not a beast. Tribe tag is important.
2
I opened two golden nat pagles. F***IN TWO!
0
Mayta.
1
Currently FoN and savage roar.
Nerfed starving buzzard and UTH.
0
Why is this even a question? Hunter has beast synergy cards since day one. It's how the class was designed in the first place. Most of their cards have synergies with beasts. Druid got some beast synergistic cards very recently, and none of them are even viable.
1
Pirate rogue and feign death hunter.
1
Hunter. Such an amazing class with great class cards. Too bad face hunter exists and that's what everyone talks about. It ruined the class' reputation.
6
I hate when people act like spare parts are not neutral spells.
1
It's difficult to play a hunter or a mage deck without scientist. That's means you have to play the secrets manually, that's means sometimes you should keep them in your starting hand, which is not a good move.
1
Beasts are for hunters. I hate how blizzard is pushing the beast thing for druid, please let this thing die.
0
Acidmaw is the only bad one, the rest are good but not used.
King Krush: excellent game finisher like grom, but he's too expensive to play in a hunter deck.
Gahz'rilla: see King Krush.
Dreadscale: this is the ultimate early game card for control decks. Warriors would kill for this. It's an excellent, cheap card even for hunters. It's just that control hunter isn't a thing yet, so that's why we don't see dreadscale a lot. Someone told me that he used it in a midrange deck it was really useful.
Acidmaw: terrible, just terrible. If you're not a collector, I'd say disenchant it. It's just so expensive and has very terrible stats with an effect that could cause YOU to lose the game. If his effect could only affect enemy minions, he'd be 100% better and people would actually play it, but the thing we got is terrible, such wasted potential.
0
Seriously though I'd make kidnapper cost 5 mana.