I'm skeptical, but sometimes the synergies surprise you. I felt the same back when WotOG dropped, but C'Thun Druid and Warrior were great for a while. The meta will be crazy following the release.
That's exactly it! In the next expansion, Priest needs several good deathrattle minions throughout its curve to make its quest viable once N'Zoth rotates. But we can't ignore N'Zoth altogether, since there are plenty of Wild aficionados out there.
Thanks for the preemptive apology, but the insult wasn't necessary.
Building a deck with low-cost spells to draw into win conditions is difficult and requires creativity, yes, of course. But "creativity," to Blizzard and many players, is stifled to an extent when the same Classic cards continue to fill decks. As long as this happens, there's less likelihood players will experiment with new cards to create new archetypes. So I guess I'm talking about creativity in a larger context.
Whether you like it or not, Blizzard created the Hall of Fame for this specific reason, so Gadgetzan Auctioneer remains a likely inductee.
Right. I remember watching Reynad the night he exploited that new interaction. He did super well and everyone, of course, said he "broke the meta," but really no one expected Giants in Hunter and couldn't play around it. Now that it's out there in the open, it's much less oppressive.
1
That does make it a bit less terrible, but we're getting a bit in the weeds now, aren't we?
3
Oops, forgot about that one.
0
I'm skeptical, but sometimes the synergies surprise you. I felt the same back when WotOG dropped, but C'Thun Druid and Warrior were great for a while. The meta will be crazy following the release.
0
That's exactly it! In the next expansion, Priest needs several good deathrattle minions throughout its curve to make its quest viable once N'Zoth rotates. But we can't ignore N'Zoth altogether, since there are plenty of Wild aficionados out there.
0
It's not a great deck, but it's great for memes. https://www.hearthpwn.com/news/4325-weasel-priest-against-all-odds
3
You're really going in on the typo, aren't you?
0
Thanks for the preemptive apology, but the insult wasn't necessary.
Building a deck with low-cost spells to draw into win conditions is difficult and requires creativity, yes, of course. But "creativity," to Blizzard and many players, is stifled to an extent when the same Classic cards continue to fill decks. As long as this happens, there's less likelihood players will experiment with new cards to create new archetypes. So I guess I'm talking about creativity in a larger context.
Whether you like it or not, Blizzard created the Hall of Fame for this specific reason, so Gadgetzan Auctioneer remains a likely inductee.
2
Best of luck!
2
Highlander Priest does well against it. Two Spellbreaker in Zoolock or Aggro Paladin worked for me last month.
0
You might as well be advocating against the internet itself.
0
Right. I remember watching Reynad the night he exploited that new interaction. He did super well and everyone, of course, said he "broke the meta," but really no one expected Giants in Hunter and couldn't play around it. Now that it's out there in the open, it's much less oppressive.
0
My take is that Cubelock (the archetype), not the Cube itself, slowed the meta. It's in the title, dude.
We can have differences of opinions about that, but let's not misrepresent anyone here.
3
I made the exact same tech. Val'anyr can make miracles happen against control decks, though.
1
You're welcome/I'm sorry.
0
Great guide for Wild. Thanks for that.