• 0

    posted a message on 1000 wins portraits
    Quote from FortyDust >>

    This thread is basically a humbebrag without the humble.

     How is this a brag ? I don't even think 1000 wins a class is impressive.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 1000 wins portraits
    Quote from Rich_Piana >>

    Enough is never enough I guess. They add something new but people want more. Surely it would be nice if they'd add a 5000 mage games won hero that I could enjoy but it's not a realistic goal for most of their playerbase

     the difference is 5000 wins is unrealistic, even for the hardcore players.

    2000 is tough but doable for some people.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on 1000 wins portraits
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>

    It's cool, I wish it was 500 wins though instead of 1000.  The only one I'm remotely close with is Shaman with 752 wins.  

     What do you mean ? Everyone has golden heroes this is 2019. We needed real achievements for veterans. The others still have golden heroes to work towards.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 1000 wins portraits

    Although I'm VERY happy about this, I am also a bit disappointed since I already have all 9 classes above 1000 wins so it doesn't give me anything to work towards.

    I hope they someday add new rewards at 1500 and 2000 wins.

    How many classes above 1000 wins do you guys have ? Thoughts on this update ?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How do YOU farm gold?

    Except I’m sure you are missing plenty of cards in your collection.

    Those numbers are meaningless if you don’t have full collection.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How do YOU farm gold?
    Quote from kitox_me >>

    wild mode

    insta concede vs priest and golden heros (might add mage to the list). i also concede vs the mirror cause its boring

     

     Everyone has golden heroes. This is 2019

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Standard vs Wild vs Arena

    I'm surprised by how many people play wild here. I expected the numbers to be much lower.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction
    Quote from sanchogrande >>
    Quote from FortyDust >>
     You are literally arguing against yourself here. You are arbitrarily choosing to make Jaraxxus better and Sacrificial Pact worse for no reason other than that you like one more than the other.

     Oh please, of course Jaraxxus is better than Sacrificial Pact. He's a classic class legendary who has been a staple in many decks, he's the eredar lord of the burning legion, and he gave us one of the most viewed meme videos on HS history. 

    Go ahead and argue that sac pact should kill Jaraxxus, but don't argue that there isn't a clear, wide gulf between the two cards in terms of quality, flavor, and history. If we have to choose between these two cards, the decision is beyond clear.

     A staple in MANY decks lmao. 5 years ago

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Anyone got a funny meme deck for me?
    Quote from Pullaa >>

    ### Darkest Hour Warlock - Wild Meta Snapshot - Sept. 21, 2019
    # Class: Warlock
    # Format: Wild
    #
    # 2x (0) Sacrificial Pact
    # 1x (1) Mortal Coil
    # 1x (1) Plague of Flames
    # 2x (1) Sinister Deal
    # 1x (1) The Soularium
    # 2x (2) Bloodbloom
    # 2x (2) Defile
    # 2x (3) Rafaam's Scheme
    # 2x (4) Fiendish Circle
    # 1x (4) Imp-losion
    # 2x (4) Voidcaller
    # 1x (5) Zilliax
    # 2x (6) Darkest Hour
    # 2x (6) Nerubian Unraveler
    # 1x (8) Ragnaros the Firelord
    # 1x (8) The Lich King
    # 1x (9) Mal'Ganis
    # 2x (9) Voidlord
    # 1x (10) Bloodreaver Gul'dan
    # 1x (10) Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound
    #
    AAEBAf0GCsQInakDj4ID3Q+ggAP2AsLOAsIPl9MCqKsCCqMB+qQDkMcC58sCq5EDkO4Cjg7+lQOnzgLo5wIA
    #
    # To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and create a new deck in Hearthstone

    This deck is fun to play sometimes and quite cheap too, probably the cheapest memey deck I got 

     Is this a joke ? Coming straight from meta snapshot

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Standard vs Wild vs Arena

    Which one do you play and enjoy most ?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why did they create Barrens Stablehand?
    Quote from Phantom_Noway >>

    New players will be happy to find in a pack.
    They can't print new good card for classic/basic set. They use expansion for that.

     why would they be happy ? the likelyhood of getting a shit beast is very high

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Preordered the new adventure but where is the legendary?
    Quote from ginzayama >>

    Oh really thanks

     Lol

    Posted in: Adventures
  • 0

    posted a message on 4 Mana New legendary: Angel of Victory (Battelcry: win the match)
    Quote from mortoz >>
    Quote from Tzon_e >>

    Stupid posts, are stupid. Admins please redirect this to the salt thread, this guy doesn't like the 60% of the decks out there, but still wants to play the game and go to Legend. @OP, take a break from the game, you need it.

     You get me wrong, i actually get a solid 40%  win against murloc decks and no highlander zephyr.

    I just wondering where is the fun in those decks since i can't find it entertaining due to the coinflip winning situation or having huge help in a deck where you cheat the draw.

    Seems like you play those, maybe you can give me that answer. What is enjoyable? The win and fast ladder? but it doesn't depends on you... isn't that important? 

    I think all your answer (except the quest shaman one, that was neat ahah)  are way more salted than my question.

    I have the legend card back and i am already lvl 3this season, i just play arena since is more fun now, so no really salted for the ladder. It was a honest question because I am just worried about  the game design direction, seems like they are looking for random new players giving them the chance to enjoy wins and spend more money.

     

     Your argument is kinda stupid my man.

    They made Zephrys because they thought he would be a cool card that brings back highlander decks.

    And he is still a cool and fun card to play. The problem is he is overpowered and unfun to play against.

    And also, highlander decks tend to be way more expensive than the average deck so no, they didn’t target random new players.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on No Legendaries in 41 Consecutive Uldum Packs?
    Quote from FortyDust >>

    How are you keeping track of the packs you open?

    Is there really no possibility of human error in your record-keeping?

     Funny thing is he claims to save screenshots for every single pack. Who in their right mind would do that ?

    Sounds fishy to me

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I know I am a bit late ...

    I didn’t know some people needed that long to complete this

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.