Hearthpwn

Why not just install the .NET framework if it requires it? .NET framework is very common framework in Windows and many apps use it so I see no harm installing it. I think they might have added feature or improvement that requires it. In future other apps might also give you this message if you refuse to install it.

This deck tries to be C'Thun and taunt warrior at the same time and ends up being inconsistent because of it. You should have one clear idea when you build a deck. Having too many different cards with too many purposes just makes your deck slow compared to decks with single idea. Against pure C'Thun the pure C'Thun kills you first with bigger C'Thun and taunt warrior completes quest quicker and kills you with Sulfuras hero power. Go for full taunt warrior or full C'Thun warrior or don't go at all.

Kazakus is propably not gonna be very relevant since Reno is rotated out. Almost same effect as Eadric the Pure but also affects own minions. If that card is not played then why this would be any better. Jades are just gonna spawn more jades if you use this against them and you will still have board full of 3/3 minions that you most likely can't kill. Not good for control decks and too slow for aggro decks so it's just average at best.

Anything that makes control more viable is a plus. It's a bit too strong with choose effect but it's class legendary so I think it is acceptable.

Quote from pepej_hs >>

 i dont play any class in particular. i just want a card that is going to be useful

Nzoth is good if you have the good deathrattle cards. Without Tirion and Cairne you only summon Sylvanas at best and you have small change to get both Sylvanas and Nzoth in the same game. I assume you play paladin and in that case I think you should get Tirion first. He is just too good and works in multiple paladin decks. Once you get Tirion and Cairne, you can get Nzoth if you want to play Nzoth paladin.

My first answer was big NO but after thinking it a bit I switched to yes.

I personally would have liked more of format where most op cards would be banned and not entire sets and the cards might be unbanned some day. (if they are no longer as op) Kind of like Yugioh game does it. New format is still fine and will be looking forward to it.

If you are afraid to lose your hard work then buy classic cards. They don't get rolled out. When expansions are released there will probably be between 5 to 20 viable cards so it doesn't take much to stay competitive if you have strong classic collection. Just wait until people test new cards and buy/craft good ones and ignore rest.

I'm bit sad to see Naxxramas adventure go. They could have at least left it available for free without rewards because you know, new players love free stuff and when there are many things to do. Even without rewards players would at least feel that they achieved something.

Overall I'm interest to see what will happen and looking forward to try new format.

I steal your Brann with Cabal Shadow Priest.

They should change battlecry to joust. Would remove it from aggro decks. I don't really like stat nerfs or totally changing flavor of card so I see this change as good way to do it.

About $200. Mostly at start of beta and then TGT pre-order. Really worth it considering that some console games cost $60-70 and I get bored to them in two months. I have played HS over year so when comparing cost to play time, HS has been really worth all that $200.

Eerie Statue seems to me like handlock card. It's card between ancient watcher and mountain giant. Can be silenced, taunted and shadowflamed. Handlock is still a decent deck. It's not the best currently but playable. Instead of releasing cards that change current decks I think it's better to release cards that might create entirely new decks. Handlock is not even the deck that needs that much help. There are plenty of other decks (or sometimes even classes) that need more help than handlock.

I asume you use this deck

If I would face lot of hunters I probably would cut Hammer of Wrath or 1 Blessing of Kings and add second Annoy-o-Tron or Defender of Argus. Not much can be done because this deck already has lot of cards that are good against face hunter. Against zoo maybe cut 1 Ironbeak Owl and add second Defender or Arcane Golem.

Deck can be modified but I feel like it might be your decision making that makes you lose. Do you feel like you are not aggressive enought? Lot of aggro paladins might try to get too much value out of cards and can't kill their opponent in time. It's okay to play Abussive Sergeant if you don't have better turn 1 play or coin out Shielded Minibot even if it breaks your curve if you can give it Blessing of Kings next turn to hit for 5 damage. It's important that you get your minions out fast. They can't do damage if they are not out. Divine Favor is in this deck for a reason because the point is to empty your hand and then fill with Divine Favor. Some times it becomes top deck hope for the best but thats the way it is. Last thing that comes to mind is that you might sometimes value your minions too much agains face hunter. What I means is hitting minions with your weapon instead of using one silver hand recruit. Hunter is fastest aggro class there is so you should value your health more except if you are far ahead. I'm just guessing what you might do wrong but it's not easy to give advice if I can't see any games.

I see nothing wrong about aggro pally. Lot of sticky cards with divine shield and good tempo. Patron is hard match up but you should be apple to win against face hunters and zoo if you play it right. It would really help if you could post your exact deck. Before that I give some succestions.

Agains Hunter: Annoy-o-Tron, Argent Squire, Shielded Minibot, Defender of Argus (all these trade well against hunters minions)

Agains Zoo: Arcane golem, Blessing of Kings, Blessing of Might (you can't contest board too much so more face is better)

I also find Ironbeak Owl very useful. Helps to get through taunts and deny good trades while you go face.

It's hard to know if it's you decision making or the deck. If it's deck then I would succest adapting to what you are facing. Change some cards to make your deck better against match ups you face alot.

They could have made this 4/4 with taunt and everyone would be happy. It would not power creep anything that way. This is okay card but not good enought to run. Ice Rager was pure choke from developers but I don't get what is the point of this card. Am I missing the choke here?

Sad to see that Blizzard already started doing this because there are so many unused stat combinations and effects and I'm sure they could invent something different if they wanted.

I'm new here but I have couple of ideas.

Gadgedzan Auctioneer -> Azure Drake You don't need Gadgedzan because you already have seven card draws without it. Azure is card draw but gives card instantly and gives spell power that works great against aggro when combined with Whirlwind and Cleave. You can consider Yeti If you don't have second Azure.

2x Sen'jin Shieldmasta -> 2x Frothing Berserker Warriors don't need taunts in my opinion. Frothing is much stronger because of one less mana and good synergy. Frothing can win games if opponent doesn't have proper answer. Because of it's effect it's also soft taunt.

Spellbreaker -> Armorsmith I would pick Spellbreaker over Armorsmith when Naxxramas comes out but until that I don't see many uses for silence. Spellbreaker is bit too situational even with 4/3 body. Armorsmith on the other hand is almost alway good play.

Argent Commander -> Arcanite Reaper This is where we have to improvise a bit. If you had legendaries I would replace Argent with Baron Geddon or Cairne but until that Arcanite is ok. It's bit faster than Argent and gives you extra removal and is good against Yetis, Sen'jins and many other things.

I hope this was helpful. I did my best to explain reasons behind every change.