For me, any correct damage dealing is the satisfaction I need. For example, I hate using fireball on a yeti with 5 health, and I love using fireball in a 6 health minion.
There are some cards that are just so trash that the only option is to dust unless you are going for a full collection. What is the point of trying to find a place for this card in your decks if all it does is decrease your win ratio?
what people doesn't understand is that in this game rank doesnt matter. I've faced "professionals" before and I've beat them, even though I'm pretty sure they are better than I am. The ranking system is horrible and I can understand your frustration, I'd recommend you play arena.
The famous snowflake argument that is being used so much that lost the meaning. The coolest decks have always been the unintended ones, and I'm ignoring the awesome unviable decks which are mostly archetypes not intended by blizzard, patron warrior is a good example.
What to expect from someone with your picture? I bet that if blizzard makes a new expansion named shit you'll be the type of guy who will defend them from critics.
I disagreed with some of your points but I can definetely agreed with one thing, the new decks are "forced" into us and doesn't feel as good inventing new decks.
Most people bashing OP got it entirely wrong. All he is saying is that most Rogue decks are boring to play against because you pretty much watch your opponent play for 10 minutes all of his cards while your plays is like: play a minion, pass.
Op is wrong in the matter that Rogue has many more archetypes, but I dot agreed that auctioneer being that important to the class is a bad design.
1
For me, any correct damage dealing is the satisfaction I need. For example, I hate using fireball on a yeti with 5 health, and I love using fireball in a 6 health minion.
2
The real issue here is Paladin being the dumpster class since secret Paladin became unviable.
1
People asking for censorship ResidentSleeper
Please stop getting triggered by stupid shit.
0
There are some cards that are just so trash that the only option is to dust unless you are going for a full collection. What is the point of trying to find a place for this card in your decks if all it does is decrease your win ratio?
0
I dont know why you even bothered putting a Paladin deck on the list.
0
the real dumpster class is Paladin.
2
what people doesn't understand is that in this game rank doesnt matter. I've faced "professionals" before and I've beat them, even though I'm pretty sure they are better than I am. The ranking system is horrible and I can understand your frustration, I'd recommend you play arena.
1
The famous snowflake argument that is being used so much that lost the meaning. The coolest decks have always been the unintended ones, and I'm ignoring the awesome unviable decks which are mostly archetypes not intended by blizzard, patron warrior is a good example.
What to expect from someone with your picture? I bet that if blizzard makes a new expansion named shit you'll be the type of guy who will defend them from critics.
0
its not random
0
I disagreed with some of your points but I can definetely agreed with one thing, the new decks are "forced" into us and doesn't feel as good inventing new decks.
0
Most people bashing OP got it entirely wrong. All he is saying is that most Rogue decks are boring to play against because you pretty much watch your opponent play for 10 minutes all of his cards while your plays is like: play a minion, pass.
Op is wrong in the matter that Rogue has many more archetypes, but I dot agreed that auctioneer being that important to the class is a bad design.
2
I can't belive what I'm reading. Are you really that pathetic?
0
I'm sorry to tell you bud, but if you can't see why this card is op as fuck you're new or really bad at understanding the game.
-7
are these guys retarded? Can't they realize Patches would be op even if it was a 1/1 without charge?
0
"Midrange Shaman" That is a funny way to put it.