• 1

    posted a message on Card Discussion- Toxic Sewer Ooze

    Your explanation to why a 4/3 for 3 mana is better than a 3/2 for 2 mana with a better effect was crap. Acidic swamp ooze is a lot more reliable.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is there a pity timer for Golden Legendaries?

    I played since Beta and my first golden legendary was N'zoth at the start of the expansion, I'd say with this information either there is no pity time for golden legenderies or it is after like 500 packs or something.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    It was already explained by me and someone else in the previous comments.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 15

    posted a message on I'm a bad, bad person. :-(

    I find playing with it as boring as against it. What is the fun of a card game if it is not interactive?

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Functional explanation/words for something that would have "First Strike"(MtG)?

    I like the concept and the idea is really unique, but an effect like this is very hard to balance and there are probably many inconsistent situations that would make the card unhealthy.

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on Functional explanation/words for something that would have "First Strike"(MtG)?

    What is the point of this effect?

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    I consider Karazhan meta the 1.0 version of the current meta, but sure, you have a point. This game went downhill since standard was introduced and I'm not even blaming the standard rules, I point my finger at blizzard's card designers.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    I already said, it is not about having a bunch of meta decks, it is about how much stronger the meta decks are when compared to tier 2 and tier 3 decks. All of the previous metas had actually a bunch of variety because people tested, discovered and were willing to play different stuff.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on 'Send good game' feature

    I love your idea, nothing would please me more than send gold to people that don't play with cancer.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    The difference is that when you put two of a card in your deck, you make your deck more consistent, by going with the 30 different cards Reno strategy you basically give up all your consistency and pray to get reno to win, while there is literally no other deck that needs 1 card to win every match.

    Edit: Also, reno is the only card in the deck that decides if you win or not. You can win or lose by drawing any other card ony our deck, but if you draw reno you win 95% of the time while if you don't, you lose like 70% of the time)

    These percentages were taken from my good common sense through experience with the deck and playing against it.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 6

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    Pirate warrior - go face

    "Midrange" Shaman - go face

    N'zoth Shamana - stop pretending people play this

    Miracle Rogue- has never been as aggressive as it is right now, go face

    Reno mage- reno

    Reno Priest - reno, same gameplay

    Reno Warlock - reno, same gameplay

    Dragon Priest - the only surviving control deck that does no have reno, unfortunately it is not even tier 1

    Jade Druid- Actually unique deck that is not very good

    C'thun Druid- Stop pretending people play this

    ANY Paladin deck - Stop pretending people play this, and even if they did, they'd lose

    Even though there are many decks, they are all the same, there is like 3 different types: dragon priest, aggro and reno. The only decks that are possible to climb with are: Miracle Rogue, Dragon Priest, all the renos, "midrange" shaman and maybe pirate warrior.

    It is literally impossible to get legend with anything other than these decks. 

    How it feels to play against aggro: "I hope he doesnt get a good hand or I'll be killed by turn 6, if he doesn't get it I have maybe a chance".

    How it feels to play against reno: "if he gets Reno, he wins, otherwise I win."

    The only deck that I consider fair and interactive is Dragon Priest.

     

     

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 2

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    casual is even worse than ranked LUL

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on RENOS EVERYWHERE

    Yea this meta is the worst by far, not because it doesn't require skill to win, but because there are few types of decks and anything that is not meta is complete garbage.

    Dear Blizzard, stop making overpowered 1 drops, stop making cards that make the game 100% based on RNG (Yogg, Reno etc), stop making aggro cards for Paladin. Thanks bye.

     

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 2

    posted a message on Why all the top decks are "Linear" and boring?

    I heard Kripp say something that I found really interesting, he basically said that blizzard tries to find that sweet spot where they can please everyone, new players and veteran players, but what end up happening is they release new simple cards (so the game is kept simple for the new players) that soon become the meta but any non meta deck is complete garbage because their game balancing sucks. So we end up with new players who can't win because they don't have the cards and veteran players who can't enjoy the game because the cards are too simple and the meta is boring.

    BLIZZARD IS TRASH.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on One Turn Kill ''Math'' Hunter (AntonAmby)

    this deck is simply awesome

    Posted in: One Turn Kill ''Math'' Hunter (AntonAmby)
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.