I've been trying to get a pro player to make a version of the sheet with the important cards only, but so far to no avail.
As per the charts, I'm not getting them the way they want and I havn't felt like learning how to do it just yet :P
I would want the charts to be the other way around - as in, currently you are seeing how much you are missing from the collection, this would need to become how much you've already collected, which in a sense, seems like a better way to put it anyways.
So that when you reach a 100% you have ''completed'' that part of the collection.
Great job! I had done something similar (much less sofisticated) so I guess I will be using your spreadsheet instead :D
It's a little bit discouraging because I think most of us thought we had more than we have in terms of dust. I, for example, still need to collect 23,948% of the cards (222 cards = 56 legendaries + 116 epics + 50 rares + 0 commons). But I didn't know that was 60,195% dust-wise. I guess I thought I had a bigger percentage of the collection because out of those 222 cards I am missing, 170 never see play.
Yes, I have actually thought about making a version of the sheet with only important cards, but I think I'm not strict enough to judge wheter a card is remotely useful or not. This is mainly because I think there's different ways to look at which cards are useful or not. There are some gimmicky decks I'm sure some people do not care about, and removing the cards used in those decks gives a whole other list of to-get-cards than if you would include them. I personally love gimmicky decks, so I would be a lot less decicive in removing cards from an important to-get-cards list.
Maybe it's a cool idea to find a competetive player to make a version of the sheet with cards to get for competetive play only. I'll see what I can do.
and thanks ;) It's very daunting indeed, seeing the actual numbers.
have you ever considered adding some chart to the file? I'd like to have, for example, a bar graph showing my progress in collecting all cards for each hero and expansion. I have done it with my heroes progress (level 1 to 60 and games won 0 to 500)
Not a bad idea, it could replace the numbers at the top and be a visual display instead of numbers, which is better. I had no idea that it was even possible to add graphs in google docs tbh, I will look into it later, or if you got some examples that'd be great.
I'll look into it, since I have to take into account compatibility. It's nice, but if 5% or more from the people won't be able to properly use the spreadsheet anymore I think it's a bad idea.
have you ever considered adding some chart to the file? I'd like to have, for example, a bar graph showing my progress in collecting all cards for each hero and expansion. I have done it with my heroes progress (level 1 to 60 and games won 0 to 500)
Not a bad idea, it could replace the numbers at the top and be a visual display instead of numbers, which is better. I had no idea that it was even possible to add graphs in google docs tbh, I will look into it later, or if you got some examples that'd be great.
Nah I gave up haha. Think it might work, it's kind of fun, and it absolutely wrecks grim patron war with those taunt walls, but unless you get a decent combo you're screwed, and I think it might lack the card draw to get those combo's quickly enough. So 1 game you get the combo, you win, the other you don't, you lose.
Interesting, but as someone who paid the advertised price in the official shop, where in terms and conditions does it state they will ban you for doing such? Is iit against terms and conditions to buy from blizzard? If so every account where some one bought from the shop would have to be banned.
Indeed. It isn't illigal to buy the packs for whatever price they offer and you cannot track it down ingame. On paper we bought 2 packs for 1.99£. That's all that exists =no evidence & their mistake. They fixed it now tho.
0
Glad it was useful Lyrl! Grats
0
I've been trying to get a pro player to make a version of the sheet with the important cards only, but so far to no avail.
As per the charts, I'm not getting them the way they want and I havn't felt like learning how to do it just yet :P
I would want the charts to be the other way around - as in, currently you are seeing how much you are missing from the collection, this would need to become how much you've already collected, which in a sense, seems like a better way to put it anyways.
So that when you reach a 100% you have ''completed'' that part of the collection.
Any help appreciated.
3
Have to agree with most people, worst tavern brawl -ever-
0
This deck get's absolutely REKT by face hunter.
0
Yes, I have actually thought about making a version of the sheet with only important cards, but I think I'm not strict enough to judge wheter a card is remotely useful or not. This is mainly because I think there's different ways to look at which cards are useful or not. There are some gimmicky decks I'm sure some people do not care about, and removing the cards used in those decks gives a whole other list of to-get-cards than if you would include them. I personally love gimmicky decks, so I would be a lot less decicive in removing cards from an important to-get-cards list.
Maybe it's a cool idea to find a competetive player to make a version of the sheet with cards to get for competetive play only. I'll see what I can do.
and thanks ;)
It's very daunting indeed, seeing the actual numbers.
0
I'll look into it, since I have to take into account compatibility. It's nice, but if 5% or more from the people won't be able to properly use the spreadsheet anymore I think it's a bad idea.
0
Not a bad idea, it could replace the numbers at the top and be a visual display instead of numbers, which is better. I had no idea that it was even possible to add graphs in google docs tbh, I will look into it later, or if you got some examples that'd be great.
0
Nah I gave up haha. Think it might work, it's kind of fun, and it absolutely wrecks grim patron war with those taunt walls, but unless you get a decent combo you're screwed, and I think it might lack the card draw to get those combo's quickly enough. So 1 game you get the combo, you win, the other you don't, you lose.
0
Thx! Fixed!
0
Still 2.99 for 7 packs.
0
ehm no they didn't, still says 2.99 here
0
Says In-App purchases are not allowed
1
Ah! thanks! Fixed them!
0
Thanks, but aren't both Lance Bearer and Frigid Snobolt spelled that way already? :P
Or am I missing something?
Lance Bearer
Frigid Snobolt
0
Varian Wrynn :))
Got Nexus-Champion Saraad after
edit: 19 packs. got some lucky.