Hearthpwn

Played an few games on ladder again, since i haven't rely played since K@C I cant handle playing against mage, warlock and paladin priest the hole time maybe its different wile im rank 24-18 spread across the 3 servers.

Nope still the same and how an i so unlucky that every mage i play against get the weapon on 6 and then kills me with 2-3 card in their deck wile never milling an single card.

I hope that weapon isnt viable for the rest of its life in standard.

and 1st game I played against on non meta deck my game disconnects and when i get back i lost.

Doesn't help i needed 5 warrior wins on asia severs where im still using boulder fist ogres in my decks.

Quote from Almaniarra >>

 

Quote from B4timer >>

So it looks like some players is ok with voidlord so can i ask for spreading plague unnerf then, since both card it meant to counter minions based strategies so it should be fine right? I want to play taunt druid again and the nerf to innovate and plague made the deck almost unplayable.

How are they any dif both t9(with the card that buff's taunts) play's that can be played faster. druid ramp v lacky and both in classes with ton of healing/armor and card draw. I see no problem with taunt druid.

Innervate is the card which needs the nerf mostly but not like this (compare it with Counterfeit Coin, I know it is different in rogue but it is against the justice). It should have been like Preparation for minions for example and with that way it could easily avoid the ridiculous ramp and ridiculous plays with Gadgetzan Auctioneer.

And Spreading Plague was not a problem in taunt druid. It was being problematic in other archetypes. tbh, I don't think the nerf hurts the card so much.

So it looks like some players is ok with voidlord so can i ask for spreading plague unnerf then, since both card it meant to counter minions based strategies so it should be fine right? I want to play taunt druid again and the nerf to innovate and plague made the deck almost unplayable.

How are they any dif both t9(with the card that buff's taunts) play's that can be played faster. druid ramp v lacky and both in classes with ton of healing/armor and card draw. I see no problem with taunt druid.

I dont care if this is good or bad just stop giving warlock healing in standard it have enough until next year already, it's already better at healing than priest. and it has more playable heal card than paladin.

Why is it from an other class didn't T5 learn that isnt good, no matter how busted the card is its bad if your playing against rogue,

When this set was in development we were playing Druidstone during frozen throne meta and everyone was complaining how OP druid was.

Need more high attack weapons to be good.

IS the rarity of this card an April fools joke because this doesn't seem epic at all.

Ill play this with CTA since what would you prefer to draw in an dragon deck this or an dragon CTA is basically draw 3 card play them for board pressure and make your future draws more likely to draw your dragons.

The biggest question isnt if ill play this with CTA but is it worth it to play dragon paladin at  the moment id say this wont make me play dragon paladin it need an card like dragon op or duskbreaker in paladin for me to consider it.

I honestly dont mind 2 class legendaries, normally 2-5 neutrals were playable anyway and the rest dust so it makes very little difference.

Besides they can push class legends more now if they should chose to since its easier to test class card than neural. If there is an problem then its that there is 3 more legends per set 2 if you consider they give you one for free.

And on warrior i know their legendary card's are bad, but it still doesn't matter as long as they get strong rares and commons or in worse case an epics since its better for F2P since they dont need to craft an legendary for their decks for the class to be playable.

lets assume worse case scenario 2 strong epics that 1600 dust and 4 slots in your deck v 1600 dust for 1 card slot in your deck overall your deck should still be less dust since more card slot had been used.

(at the moment of this post still missing an rare the 2 epics and 3 common) 

At least give it more attack, 4 maybe not like it will be attacking stuff since it cant attck. 

Yes 2 per class and 9 neutral i guess the logic is, its the same as the amount of classes. So if you ever wonder there its an easy way to remember the amount or just go 3*9=27.

rare's is 3 per class plus 9 neutral so 36.

You know i kinda want to know how many of Kaladin 6,904 post was in the salty thread's this one and prev one

It's not the card i hate but the rarity. Both flaking strike and tomb pillager is common and this is an epic and im my opinion its worse than both. 

Quote from tomiathon >>

 

Quote from Rimousqui >>

Even Ragnaros, the firelord feels weaker since it fell to wild. The problem isn't that these cards are weak, they remain strong cards, but the Wild meta is so much different now than what it was at the time they were shining and sent down. They aren't the power creep they used to be since there are so much more board-filling, board-clearing, aggressive decks now that your higher drops need to be consistent with your deck. Maybe the return of mechs will see Dr.7 getting stronger, same with elementals for Rag

 

 Rag has been a weak card basically since Naxx and the massive influx of small sticky minions and aggro decks. I still have no idea why they thought it necessary to move it to the HoF because it was basically unplayable. you basically waste your turn to kill a token most of the time.