Hearthpwn

I could be wrong but the signature cards look AI generated to me. Here are the reasons I think so:

1. Tyrande's right foot seems a lot smaller than her left foot, even though her right foot should be closer to us.

2. Her right boots seem to feature 2 dark carvings which are completely missing from the left boots.

3. The right side of her skirt seems to be transformed into the branch that is also present on the left side. Or if not, then what IS this?

4. Is this part of her hair of part of her hairdress? Again this seems to me like the typical way AI wouldn't be able to decide which one to draw and just merges the two.

5. Naralex seems to have a piece of dark cloth on his right hand coming out of his gloves. The same cloth is visible on his other side, even though his left hand is up in the air...

6. The right leg of Naralex's trousers just randomly disappear behind his cloak, even though on the other side, his trousers seems to be a lot wider.

7. His right shoulder features a black and red striped piece of cloth with 3 brown feathers, while his left shoulder seems to be missing the same piece of cloth (may be due to perspective), but it does have 6 brown feathers instead of 3.

8. The Curator has a curved golden seam running across his chest. Near his left shoulder, this seems to be a continuation of the central golden curve, but not on the other side.

9. Near his left shoulder, there seems to be a shell-shaped object formed out of the golden seam, which is some distance apart from the golden spiral on the same side. But on the other side, this is either completely missing, or if it's there but less detailed, then it is directly next to the spiral, not some distance apart.

10. None of the Chinese/Japanese characters make any sense. To me they all seem like an AI's attempt at writing in an east-Asian script. Naralex's middle paragraph almost seems to end with ~ます (~masu), which is an extremely common Japanese verb ending. It seems to me that the AI picked up on this, but didn't understand the pattern of the rarer characters, so it just ended up "writing" a complete mess.

Again, I could be wrong, but looking at these pictures for a while, they definitely seem off. I especially think the writing is weird. Imo, noone would consciously write fake, non-existent east-Asian looking characters this way.

Here are all the cards Hemet can generate, in order of descreasing mana cost:
Shirvallah, the Tiger
Tyrantus
Baku the Mooneater
Hadronox
King Krush
Oondasta
Akali, the Rhino
Hir'eek, the Bat
Invincible
Octosari
Ozumat
Bearon Gla'shear
Blackwater Behemoth
Colaque
Gahz'rilla
Glugg the Gulper
Gonk, the Raptor
Hydralodon
Jan'alai, the Dragonhawk
King Mosh
Malorne
Nellie, the Great Thresher
Armagedillo
Crabatoa
Krag'wa, the Frog
Kresh, Lord of Turtling
Maexxna
Mukla, Tyrant of the Vale
Swamp King Dred
The Beast
The Lurker Below
Al'ar
Gral, the Shark
Halazzi, the Lynx
Knuckles
Moonfang
Princess Huhuran
Subject 9
The Rat King
Arfus
Acidmaw
Dreadscale
King Mukla
SN1P-SN4P
Zixor, Apex Predator
Clutchmother Zavas
Pyros
Chameleos

After the next standard rotation, these cards will also be added to Hemet's pool:
Thunderbringer
The One-Amalgam Band
Mister Mukla
Spurfang
Blightfang
Slagmaw the Slumbering
Thori'belore
Spirit of the Badlands

Dane's gonna love this card in Nazmani Bloodweaver Priest.

These runes appear in WoW, all over the place on pillars inside Ironforge. This specific picture is from Steelfury's Weapon Emporium, inside the Commons. This is the only place it's presented horizontally like this. The pattern repeats several times after the Y looking rune.

If the R and the TH weren't doubled up, then these are the potential phrases that could be constructed:

their slag
theirs lag
their lags

I don't think Hearthstone is making a reference to the client performance here, so my current guess is

their slag

Which is a metal-smelting byproduct, could technically be connected to Titan facilities. But maybe I went completely the wrong way, we'll see.

Interesting variant. I don't think Crystology is necessary, but who knows. :) I think you need a lot more survivability with taunts like Stonehill Defender. But I wish you success with the deck when the expansion actually starts!

You're right, I didn't think of that.

EDIT: Changed the deck slightly, added 2 Augmented Elekks, so now 50 damage is actually possible.

I like the idea of Azelina, but I've only faced 1 Shudderwock Shaman so far, so I don't think it's a big deal. Maybe when the meta evovles and has a lot more Shudderwocks, I'll include it too.
Omega Assembly also good, but in my experience, the deck has enough value already.
Giggling Inventor instead of Stonehill is a great choice, I didn't even think of it yet, let me know how you do with it.

With this 2nd revision I actually started winning on Rank 5, I won 3 games in a row, hurray! :)

EDIT: Overall so far I went 48-28 from Rank 9 to 4.

Dirty Rat, Deathlord & Rin, the First Disciple counters it.

Dirty Rat : You can play a Control Mage (similar to the Standard list; or a Reno list - althogh that would only be able to run 1 Dirty Rat).

Deathlord : You can play Mill Rogue, Mill Druid, Inner Fire Priest and run Deathlord.

Rin, the First Disciple: Obviusoly Control Warlock. Druid is slow enough that you'll be able to play Azari, the Devourer.

Hearthstone has greatly expanded in the past, and a lot of different decks were created. But we're still stuck with 9 deck slots. Can we expect to get more in the future?

I just don't see how the leader of the HORDE will play the leader of the ALLIANCE. :D

But in all seriousness, the card itself is amazing. You get immediate value: this card wouldn't be bad even if you just drew those 3 cards.

Compare this to Ancient of Lore, that card lost 5 stats for the 2 card drawing effect (~7/8 -> 5/5), so that's 33.3% of the stats lost.

THIS card lost about 6 or 7 stats (10/11 or 10/10 -> 7/7), and that's about 30%-33.3% of the stats lost for the effect.

But it's even better, because you get the chance of summoning those minions. I'd say an average minion in Control Warrior is Sludge Belcher. In average you can immediately summon 1 or 2 Sludge Belchers. Which is not bad at all. Compare that effect to Cenarius or Dr. Boom. I think the bonus mana is definitely worth for the chance of summoning the cards.

Also, I just checked out a Control Warrior deck. It runs about 17-19 minions (let's say 18 in average). So you summon 60% (18/30) of the cards you draw with this. Now Cruel Taskmaster and Big Game Hunter or any card with a good Battlecry effect isn't great to summon, but generally, summoning is a bonus.

You can easyly setup for lethal next turn just by playing this card.

Of course there will be a time when you get nothing summoned, and you'll be quite sad, but then it's still worth the mana cost, because you dig a lot deeper in your deck.