Help
  • Athame7's avatar

    2

    Jan 11, 2018
    Athame7 posted a message on HotMEOWTH's Big Spell Mage - Top 50 Legend
    Quote from Urungulu >>

    I'm one Dragon's Fury short - worth crafting? I've got 500 dust and don't really need to craft anything.

     Yes
    Posted in: HotMEOWTH's Big Spell Mage - Top 50 Legend
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Jan 11, 2018
    Athame7 posted a message on Traditional or Keleseth Spiteful Priest?
    Quote from arpitduelist >>

    Prince Keleseth is a Rogue only card. The pros were correct that it's a bad card. I mean it's okay, but it's not worth sacrificing good 2 - drops or some important spells. It only works in Rogue because of Shadowstep and it's not like Shadowstep is useless without Keleseth. It can be used with Vilespine Slayer, Elven Minstrel or even better, Leeroy jenkins for 8 mana 12 damage combo and you are just giving up Eviscerates which is not much of a big deal for the upside Keleseth provides in Rogue.

    Don't put Kel in Priest.

     Yet kel holds strong winrates In many decks *thinking*
    Posted in: Priest
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Jan 11, 2018
    Athame7 posted a message on Shadow Reflection is This Week's Brawl!
    Quote from Starblind >>

    Maybe because they said they were new f2p and the set was 2 expansions ago? Commons way overpriced at 40 dust so unless they already play a deck that includes it why would they have it?

     Commons are pay2play confirmed
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Jan 5, 2018
    Athame7 posted a message on Servant of Yogg-Saron Tryouts is This Week's Tavern Brawl
    Quote from nd_ohnoes >>

    My deck had Servant of Yogg-Saron which gave me Deck of Wonders and Burgle .  Burgle gave me another Deck of Wonders. 

    So much RNG...Blizzard please have mercy.

     no whats really wacky is trying to do a priest quest and getting 4 deck of wonders in a row. So many spells. 
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 30, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on C’thun vs. Cubes-I Need help with classic C’thun warrior against Cubeloc

    Might just have to grab a spellbreaker and live without slam

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 29, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on What's on Your Hearthstone Wishlist for 2018?
    Quote from BasedKaito >>
    Quote from Fluxflashor >>

    My desires are not the same as yours. We're already getting a ladder revamp anyway so there's not much point in bringing it up again. 

    Cost problems are blown out of proportion in some ways, but yes, it definitely would be nice to see something on that end but honestly, I don't know what I exactly want to see out of it so again I didn't feel the need to bring it up.

    Focus less on what I want and more of what you want. Exactly how do you want Blizzard to address the cost issue?

     "Cost problems are blown out of proportion in some ways"
    It's okay to be a blizzard shill, dude. Just don't insult our intelligence pretending not to be one. This is the most important hearthstone website there is, the devs surely visit this place every now and then, but sadly the small chance to get good and meaningful changes in the game was wasted because you instead of having the balls to ask for all the stuff the community has been asking for years you just write about cosmetic stuff.
    Now, the cost problems are not blown out of proportion at all, in fact I am surprised people are not outside of Team 5's office with torchs right now. They have been making the game more and more expensive very subtly with each expansion and you know it. I'll write how they made the game more expensive just in case anyway:
    -Deleted adventures. Yes, an adventure is way way way cheaper to 100% than a expansion where you have to buy over 1000 packs for the small chance to get every card.
    -Then, they add 2 legendary cards per class, one of wich is always mandatory for the class in that expansion (IE: Quests, hero cards and weapons)
    -And the latest greed move they did in this expansion: Make every single good, fun and interesting card either legendary or epic. Seriously, they didn't even TRY to hide it this time. Want to play the wacky deck of wonders? Nope, epic. Want to play that amazing demon lord? Nope, epic. Do you want to play the interesting and powerful 5 mana 4/6 green slime? Nope, epic. How about the wacky 6 mana 4/4 that shows a random spell from your deck and summons a minion? Nope.
     But I still know tons of f2p players with collections that are amazingly vast.
    Also, you're the only one insulting anyone here, he didn't "insult your intelligence" in any way, and your immediate segregation of him as being a "Blizzard Shill" and thus being 'biased and invalid in opinion' actually does make you a douche. Anyway, to your points
    Adventures staled the meta- 
    With only 40 cards, they had to make the cards decent or no one would care for the adventure due to its inherent cost- Thus you end with creations like Emperor Thaurissan and we had a card that was so powerful it created the most oppressive deck known to history in Undertaker Hunter. Today, we still have several decks that have insta-includes from ONIK, such as Book, Netherspite Historian, and Barnes. 
    Normality of the Genre- 
    In every card game, Magic the Gathering- Elder Scrolls Legends- Faeria, its always about seeing what you find, and then what you can make of it. Of course you can always spend money to build a specific deck, but doing that comes with an inherently higher cost. This is not Blizzard's fault as much as it is a genre ideology because of the Spike players psychological need to have what is best. Due to this, Free To Play players will always attempt to make the best deck (Be it jade druid, or raza priest) if they are a spike archetype, while Johnny and Timmy players try to respectively get their big and combo decks, it just so happens that those big and combo cards also happen to be legendries, like every card game. In any meta they try to push where control is the name-of-the-game, each player type inherently reverts to epics and legendries which are more expensive. This is also a result of "Power Creep" where a Johnny wont wan't to play an Ironbark in his ramp druid, he wants to play The Lich King. 
    Assumed Intent
    your automatic assumption is that they intentionally made every good card an epic or legendary, which in and of itself is unfair to anyone you make the assumption to. While I'm sure there are people who would take this approach, Blizzard would not do this "obvious move' because it would be bad for PR- IN other words- Capitalism checks this, if you really believe Blizzard to be going off the rails, Move to a different game. Anyone who believes the same should take the same approach because this in and of itself sends a message to corporations. If they don't adjust- they fall down in the food chain. 
    One last point on your post.
    You stated and I quote "but sadly the small chance to get good and meaningful changes in the game was wasted because you..."
    This certainly isn't true. for one it's ironic because you make the implication that blizzard is some money-hungry savage or some idiotic moron. You also make the assumption he 's a moron because instead of wanting what everyone else wants, he wants what he wants. 
    Second, I highly doubt him making this post means Blizzard just assumes everyone wants cosmetic items because this one person said so. In fact,Team 5 uses Reddit more than they do this or their own forum, so theres an entirely different voice they're getting there as well. Their decision-making doesn't gravitate around Fluxflashor, because they still made changes long before Hearthpwn and by extent Fluxflashor's "Influence" as you would have it existed. Not only that, but because its a ridiculous claim founded on unreasonable 'evidence' and superstition. 
     
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    5

    Dec 10, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on The HearthPwn Kobolds & Catacombs Community Compendium
    Quote from YogoWafelPL >>

    The Runespear isn't THAT terrible, however I am wondering whoever thought that 8 mana is an adequate cost for a card that can fuck you over majorly.. 

     they have yoggophobia
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    5

    Dec 7, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on [Fast wins] Patches Aggro Warrior

    ur disgusting

    Posted in: [Fast wins] Patches Aggro Warrior
  • Athame7's avatar

    2

    Dec 5, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on [KnC] KRUL'DANGEROUS!
    Quote from GrampaWalrus >>

    Looks Hella fun! Nice to see somebody else who's gonna be experimenting early on in the meta.

     Its going to probably be one of the only decks I play beside handlock; going to be fuckn funny tho
    Edit) esp when people friend req "Fucking casino mage"
    Posted in: [KnC] KRUL'DANGEROUS!
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 5, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on Lets Make it Together- Armor of War
    Quote from Dmitriy17th >>

    u supplied hero power, but we need a card

     I said It would look like a hero power on field so it isn't clunky and huge.
    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 5, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on Lets Make it Together- Armor of War

    Pretext: So every expansion we get a regular theme, minions and spells from somewhere... but this expansion would accompany anywhere from Azeroth, it would be a radically different expansion as probably more than 2/3 of the cards should be "items", minions that affect them, or spells that affect them. Legendary equipment would be one per class with a legendary minion OR spell per class.

    First- two (new?) keywords

    Equipment would have 3 slots, and its tag would be "Equipment-W" or "Equipment-G" or "Equipment-S". Another option could be "Item-Weapon" or "Item-Gear" or "Item-Support"

    Weapon (What we have now)

    Gear (An item that typically buffs your hero in some way)

    Support (An item that typically buffs your field in some way, or an effect not relevant directly to you or your minions)

    Gear would have the same look on field as a Hero Power to keep it condensed.

    Heres the first card, I decided to make a Gear for mage. 

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • Athame7's avatar

    2

    Dec 4, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on [KnC] KRUL'DANGEROUS!

    Lul Mage Yogg Mage Deck by Athame7 - Dec 2, 2017
    Export to BBCode Export to Cockatrice Export to MarkDown Export to Html Clone this deck
    Minion (13) Ability (16) Playable Hero (1)
    Loading Collection
    what I'm going to run

    Posted in: [KnC] KRUL'DANGEROUS!
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 4, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on Final Kobolds & Catacombs Card Reveal Stream - Live Updates

    We now have kboold apprentice to make this e

    Quote from Shadowyman >>

    If there is a hidden interaction when Arcane Missiles all hit The Darkness after it is activated, I would lose my mind at the meta jokes involved.

     ven funnier.
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    8

    Dec 4, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on Taking a Deeper Look into Murlocadin - An Aggressive Fishy Surprise of the Light
    Quote from MurlocHolmes_HS >>

    Odd number of spelling, typing, and format errors here for a HearthPwn article....

     Odd number of shits given for something that doesn't matter on the internet. 
    Posted in: News
  • Athame7's avatar

    0

    Dec 2, 2017
    Athame7 posted a message on New Hunter Card Reveal: To My Side!
    Quote from LatinLegacy >>

    Oh look, it's another BAD Epic Hunter spell. No one should be surprised at this point. Team 5 has no damn clue what to do with Hunter. The class will continue down its downwards spiral unless the last handful of reveals are top tier to meta divining cards. 

     they're probably scared of another undertaker hunter/midrange hunter meta... 
    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.