-
- Ashaf306
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years, 8 months, and 27 days
Last active Tue, Dec, 10 2019 15:00:49 -
- 6
- 21
- 1 Follower
- 321 Total Posts
- 270 Thanks
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
1
1
Agree with some of the nerfs.
The Silver Hand recruit "nerf" will actually lead to other problems. Since 2/2 is more difficult to kill, it means they have more staying power and therefor higher chances of buffs. Imagine you have 3 or 4 2/2s on the board and you play Unidentified Maul with divine shield. Congrats, now you have to face multiple Shielded Minibot.
The Ballista Shot "nerf", should actually have been an ability for Hunters a long ago. They should have released a card that converts the hero power from deal damage to enemy hero to deal 2 damage. Steamwheedle Sniper should have made the ability permanent. But then, there might be concerns that Hunter can clear the enemy board while developing their own.
Carnivorous Cube should not exist in the game. Period. It is a card that people will always find a way to abuse. The effect needs complete alternation. People saying Cube is not the problem need to look at Cube Druid. No, it's not Taunt Druid. Its Cube Druid. The deck exists because of the Cube. If Cube didn't exist, the deck will be manageable. Since it will have two Hadronox combos and the combo pieces will be difficult to assemble. Right now you can face upto 7 Hadronox (I have faced 4 after silencing 1 Cube. That's four sets of taunt and 8 Lich King). Making the Cube silencing the minion before killing and summoning two minions doesn't solve anything. Silencing Doomguard does nothing. Silencing Voidlord does nothing, you still get two of back, only loosing 3 1/3s and that actually makes Bloodreaver better LoL! Silencing Hadronox does nothing because Druids can pop the Cube various ways and resummon two. As it turns out, Hadronox is easy to kill.
I do not like the proposed nerf here since Warlocks can just resummon the demons via Skull of the Minari. Druids can replay Hadronox and pop it.
CUBE IS THE PROBLEM. The power level is beyond any card before. As long as there are ways to resummon minions and kill your own minions, Cube will continue to be a problem. Another problem is that classes don't really have a way to deal will mass boards. If you can remove all the minions it will not be a problem. But but but, Hadronox and Voidlord are deathrattle minions and so is the Cube. Nevermind. There is no way out here, you're screwed. GG, WP. Just play Quest Rogue. The deck is so creative and requires tremendous amount of skill.
The remaining two nerfs, I agree with.
0
0
0
I will definitely try it! :)
3
There is no update from Blizzard regarding the meta. They said they will release some information early this week. How much data do you need to make a simple decision of nerfing some cards?
Just nerf Carnivorous Cube, Unidentified Maul and a couple of other cards. Make life easy for the players. It is so stupid to face the same cards, not even decks, over and over.
You have a decent winrate with a deck you made? Its doing good? Well here, meta shit in yo face!
They also need to end their retarded bias designing style. Give ALL classes a set of cards to make interesting decks. Not just a couple classes. If I remember correctly, Warlock is the only class that had a 3 card set reveled this expansion. Hunter got no synergy cards. They released Toxmonger and completely skipped a decent 1 drop for Hunters to actually make the card work, knowing Hunters are loosing 1 drops. Yeah You have Elven Archer and freaking Stonetusk Boar. But how about Hunter specific 1 drop for the synergy. Like you do with every other class you idiots. Hunters need reliable removal. It goes well with the Quest too. Or how about card draw?
They gave Hunters two dragons. And they don't even work like the other dragons. They have a completely new mechanic in place. At least be consistent with a tribe. All other freaking dragons and dragon synergy cards work with if "you are holding a dragon", here is this numbnuts, Carrion Drake works if a minion dies on the board on your turn. Whatever the hell happened to "holding a dragon?" Is this also oppressing the players in rank 25? That when it comes to Hunters you completely alter the theme of dragons that has been part of the game for 4+ years?
The other dragon is just because Blizzard simply isn't interested in Hunters. Because yawn Hunter. They did because they wanted to make a Hunter legendary and didn't want to repeat the boring beast theme that has been part of Hunters.
There is a third card related to dragons released for Hunters. Because it has a dragon picture on it and the name is Wing Blast. Get it? That makes it a dragon related card. I mean. You can literally call it "Fart: Deal 4 damage to a minion" and nothing will change. Nothing. I mean give the card a new animation unique to Hunters, you literally recycled the Warrior cards animation. That's the level of interest in Hunters. This card also has that theme of kill a minion. It makes sense here and I actually like the theme. I find it interesting and something Blizzard should work with in the future. Oh wait. It's a Hunter theme. Nevermind. Next expansion they will make a Hunter Elemental, 7 mana 6/7. It will read "Random Hunter Card we made because yawn Hunter: If you played a Mech two turns ago, gain +1/+1 and do nothing else". Now Hunters have a 7 drop they have been whining about for years and its an ELEMENTAL, 7 mana 7/8!!! Boulderfist Orge counter we all have been waiting for.
Hunters are the rush mechanic experts of the game, just like Warriors. Gets two rush related cards. 1 doesn't even have rush. The other is unplayable and makes a freaking depressing weird sound when played. It feels like even the card is asking the player "why are you playing me dude???" 2 mana deal 2 damage to a minion you don't want to deal damage to. Repeat for 4 mana and so fort. Such an expert of the rush mechanic. Houndmaster Shaw actually breaks your opponent if he stays on the board. What synergy card he got? Nothing. Because, yawn Hunter. Oh Yeah there is the 5 mana dragon we talked about earlier. You can kill an enemy minion with Shaw, get the dragon on the board with poisonous and remove another minion while Shaw and Carrion Drake contest the board on your next turn. You kill an enemy minion with Shaw and plan to play Carrion Drake to proceed with your plan. Oh wait. Shaw died because Spiteful Summoner Summoned "Grandpa, 12/12: Win the Game". You had to run Shaw into Grandpa to give the Drake poisonous, since that's the new Dragon theme. You play your Drake because it has poisonous and contest Grandpa. Your opponent plays a taunt. Grandpa goes face. Spiteful goes face. You are down to 10 hp. GG WP. Because yawn Hunter. Stay rank 20. Because that's where your competition is. Against newby players who can deal with your hero power. Here, have Baku, now you can kill them noobs faster and LoL HARDER.
The Witchwood expansion having very little effective on the game goes on to show Blizzard's designing of classes is rigged beyond imagination. Pick up the cards and the top cards are for classes that got top cards for the past 4-5 expansions. Kazakus is a thing in Hearthstone, an answer to all your problems at all turns. Didn't get an answer from Kazakus? No worries. Here have a 3 mana 2/2 "give you the answer to your current problems". Then you had the freaking Jades. You know what I realized playing those decks? I didn't even had to bother. Just play whatever. Because I got so disinterested with it. While the Grimmy Goons got Don Han'Cho. How can you compare the three legendaries? Hunters got "give a minion in your hand +2/+2". Warriors got "+2/+2" and "+3/+3". Paladins got "give all minions +1/+1". Guess which one feels better just by a simple look at the mechanic? Granted none of them worked, but Paladins got the favor even in that design.
They are so invested in Warlock they spent about 7 expansions trying to make Discardlock work. They failed but succeeded in discarding other classes. Dragon Priest got so much love, it got AIDS. This is what happens when you make the same class have an orgy over and over again. Paladins have started to have orgies with itself. Everywhere a Paladin goes, all they see are Paladins, resulting in some serious Dude on Dude action. How many Dudes you got? 4? I got 5, oh yeah baby! Come at me! But Druids got the best love, their Dudes grow every time you summoned one. But yawn Hunters.
I honestly tried to make this post as user friendly and civil as I could but I cannot stop myself. Whenever I think about the game on the micro level it just pisses me off so much I turn to sarcasm, uncivilized comments. I actually want to sit down with the Devs and make them hate themselves. I actually want them to feel shame. I will outline each and every failure they made regarding the game. Make them walk naked from their Headquarters to their home, chanting "SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!"
RNG was a problem in this game. But RNG was a problem EVERYONE FACED. Now you have quarter of the population playing Cubelock swearing at Aggroladins and Cubedruid, quarter of the population playing Aggroladins swearing at Cubelock and Cubedruid, quarter of the population playing Cubedruid swearing at Aggorladins and Cubelocks and the remaining quarter wondering "How long can this go on?"
Why can't Blizzard give equal attention to every class and come up with interesting mechanics and play styles for all the classes? Is it really that difficult? You are honestly telling me, that Pirate Warrior was not as oppressive as Hunter ever was in the lower ranks? Or the current Paladins does not do the same? A strong deck like Cubelock, etc. does not oppress players at lower ranks? You will find the deck at rank 25. Seriously. Go, see it. And it is not oppressive for the new players?
How about giving classes all sorts of play styles. Wanna play aggro, mid-range or control with a class? Sure, you can do all three. So this by printing class cards. So, even if the game is aggro vs. aggro, it's different. Not Pirate vs. Pirate or Keleseth vs. Keleseth. Make class cards more impacting and not stupid cards like Carnivorous Cube, that a very strong bias towards one class because of how they can pop it on their own turn. Now you have two who can do it. And if you want it to be a mechanic, then give all classes the same type of play style. HOLD ON, HOLD ON, HOLD ON! Do you really think I want another freaking Patches vs. Patches crap or Keleseth vs. Keleseth crap. If you do this, I will twist your nipples and step on your nuts at the same time.
I can honestly go on for days about how stupid the game design philosophy has become in Hearthstone. And how it needs to be changed and changed fast. But I won't. You really think I want to deal with this crap all the time? Hell freaking no!
Just nerf the Goddamn oppressive cards so we can have a different freaking meta already.
BECAUSE!
YAWN!
HUNTER!
10
8
Great. Another infinite loop deck...
With Blizzard releasing low cost summon/resurrect/recruite cards, Cube will be a pain to deal with for the next two years.
This will be the new cancer once Lock and Pala are nerfed. Can't wait to face it 9 out of 10 times.
You faced 6 taunts in a game? Well how about 50? That also heal and generate cards.
And you thought Jade's were bad.
And you thought Cubelock was bad.
I think it's better to stop trying at this point and just exit the game.
Who came up with the idea of the cube and low cost resummon cards. All of those people should be fired.
5
Both Paladin and Warlocks need a nerf. The tools they have are stupid right now. Every class lost most of their OPness if not all. The thing is Blizzard focused too much on making Paladin aggro and Warlock control that they completely counter their flaws now. Warlock has too much healing and stupid taunts as well as a way to resummon them. Paladin has too much board presence, killed 5 minions? No problem, here have 5 more to deal with, you deal them? Ok, here, 5 more. And guess what, both classes are based around recruit. Yes, you have Odd Paladin who doesn't recruit but they generate so many tokens it can be regarded as recruit.
Paladin's Unidentified Maul turns their board from deal able to hahahaha you're so screwed. Aggro decks should exist, but not to the point of Undertaker Hunter, Pirate Warrior (or any Pirate deck once Patches got popular, and surprise surprise, the mechanic was RECRUIT!) and now Odd Paladin. Aggro should be manageable. With the lack of board clears across the game in Standard, minion based decks are bound to become popular, but it should be about intelligent trading, not "hurpdurp face ma army of 1/1s, some of them have divine shield and some have divine shield AND taunt".
Even Paladin is difficult too, but it can be handled if you clear their board, which is much easier then Odd Paladin. It's a midrange deck, so control obviously find it difficult to deal with.
Warlock's 6 mana combo is gain 8 HP summon a "5/7 charge minion" or "3/9 deahtrattle summon 3 1/3s". It's just stupid. Even if you silence Voidlord and try to deal face damage to bring them down, they just play Cube and oh guess what, two more Voidlord. Next turn, spellstone. I cannot imagine people call Cubelock a skill based deck. Where is the skill? Its just as braindead as any aggro deck. The deck has literally no unique plays whatsoever. Every game is a repeat of the previous one. Giving dejavu a bad name.
Current decks are finding it hard to add new cards since the power level of old cards is beyond the roof. MSoG should have been a prime example of overpowered cards, but Blizzard never learns.
I have commented on their design philosophy many times. Their give 3-4 cards in an expansion to a class for a specific playstyle, along with some neutral cards. This spawns a deck. Then they add a couple more cards in the next set, making the deck stronger. Which is fine. The problem is they do this with ONLY a few classes. Paladins, Warlocks and Priests get this type of treatment. Rest of the classes get 2 cards max to design a archetype around them. Nothing next few expansions. Hunter, Warrior and Shaman are prime examples of them. Look at the kit of Hunters, Warriors and Shaman and tell me this is not true.
Blizzards has favorites. Nothing wrong with that. Sure some people enjoy designing one class more then others. Like I enjoy Hunter and Warrior more then other classes, sometimes Shaman and Priest. But this means you need to have a fair number of people who enjoy designing a class. Right now their team has a very very heavy bias towards some classes. They completely banned Spell Hunter after just one expansion. Deadman Hands Warrior? On the other hand, Priest got so much favor they were able to do ANYTHING before the rotation. Warlock has been extremely powerful for years and has now reached unmanageable levels, same with Paladin.
A meta should have at least 4-6 tier 1 decks. That is a healthy meta. When was the last time this happened? They just don't care. Sometimes players whining is unjustified, but stats do not lie. Decks having more then 60% winrate should be nerfed immediately. That's more then what Undertaker Hunter had and the class is still suffering from what happened more then 4 years ago. Other classes do it? No problem, players aren't skilled enough to find an answer.
Stupid design philosophy has been part of Hearthstone for a long long time. Its about time it should end.
0
Both Paladin and Warlocks need a nerf. The tools they have are stupid right now. Every class lost most of their OPness if not all. The thing is Blizzard focused too much on making Paladin aggro and Warlock control that they completely counter their flaws now. Warlock has too much healing and stupid taunts as well as a way to resummon them. Paladin has too much board presence, killed 5 minions? No problem, here have 5 more to deal with, you deal them? Ok, here, 5 more. And guess what, both classes are based around recruit. Yes, you have Odd Paladin who doesn't recruit but they generate so many tokens it can be regarded as recruit.
Paladin's Unidentified Maul turns their board from deal able to hahahaha you're so screwed. Aggro decks should exist, but not to the point of Undertaker Hunter, Pirate Warrior (or any Pirate deck once Patches got popular, and surprise surprise, the mechanic was RECRUIT!) and now Odd Paladin. Aggro should be manageable. With the lack of board clears across the game in Standard, minion based decks are bound to become popular, but it should be about intelligent trading, not "hurpdurp face ma army of 1/1s, some of them have divine shield and some have divine shield AND taunt".
Even Paladin is difficult too, but it can be handled if you clear their board, which is much easier then Odd Paladin. It's a midrange deck, so control obviously find it difficult to deal with.
Warlock's 6 mana combo is gain 8 HP summon a "5/7 charge minion" or "3/9 deahtrattle summon 3 1/3s". It's just stupid. Even if you silence Voidlord and try to deal face damage to bring them down, they just play Cube and oh guess what, two more Voidlord. Next turn, spellstone. I cannot imagine people call Cubelock a skill based deck. Where is the skill? Its just as braindead as any aggro deck. The deck has literally no unique plays whatsoever. Every game is a repeat of the previous one. Giving dejavu a bad name.
Current decks are finding it hard to add new cards since the power level of old cards is beyond the roof. MSoG should have been a prime example of overpowered cards, but Blizzard never learns.
I have commented on their design philosophy many times. Their give 3-4 cards in an expansion to a class for a specific playstyle, along with some neutral cards. This spawns a deck. Then they add a couple more cards in the next set, making the deck stronger. Which is fine. The problem is they do this with ONLY a few classes. Paladins, Warlocks and Priests get this type of treatment. Rest of the classes get 2 cards max to design a archetype around them. Nothing next few expansions. Hunter, Warrior and Shaman are prime examples of them. Look at the kit of Hunters, Warriors and Shaman and tell me this is not true.
Blizzards has favorites. Nothing wrong with that. Sure some people enjoy designing one class more then others. Like I enjoy Hunter and Warrior more then other classes, sometimes Shaman and Priest. But this means you need to have a fair number of people who enjoy designing a class. Right now their team has a very very heavy bias towards some classes. They completely banned Spell Hunter after just one expansion. Deadman Hands Warrior? On the other hand, Priest got so much favor they were able to do ANYTHING before the rotation. Warlock has been extremely powerful for years and has now reached unmanageable levels, same with Paladin.
A meta should have at least 4-6 tier 1 decks. That is a healthy meta. When was the last time this happened? They just don't care. Sometimes players whining is unjustified, but stats do not lie. Decks having more then 60% winrate should be nerfed immediately. That's more then what Undertaker Hunter had and the class is still suffering from what happened more then 4 years ago. Other classes do it? No problem, players aren't skilled enough to find an answer.
Stupid design philosophy has been part of Hearthstone for a long long time. Its about time it should end.
0
Awesome stuff!
2
Both Paladin and Warlocks need a nerf. The tools they have are stupid right now. Every class lost most of their OPness if not all. The thing is Blizzard focused too much on making Paladin aggro and Warlock control that they completely counter their flaws now. Warlock has too much healing and stupid taunts as well as a way to resummon them. Paladin has too much board presence, killed 5 minions? No problem, here have 5 more to deal with, you deal them? Ok, here, 5 more. And guess what, both classes are based around recruit. Yes, you have Odd Paladin who doesn't recruit but they generate so many tokens it can be regarded as recruit.
Paladin's Unidentified Maul turns their board from deal able to hahahaha you're so screwed. Aggro decks should exist, but not to the point of Undertaker Hunter, Pirate Warrior (or any Pirate deck once Patches got popular, and surprise surprise, the mechanic was RECRUIT!) and now Odd Paladin. Aggro should be manageable. With the lack of board clears across the game in Standard, minion based decks are bound to become popular, but it should be about intelligent trading, not "hurpdurp face ma army of 1/1s, some of them have divine shield and some have divine shield AND taunt".
Even Paladin is difficult too, but it can be handled if you clear their board, which is much easier then Odd Paladin. It's a midrange deck, so control obviously find it difficult to deal with.
Warlock's 6 mana combo is gain 8 HP summon a "5/7 charge minion" or "3/9 deahtrattle summon 3 1/3s". It's just stupid. Even if you silence Voidlord and try to deal face damage to bring them down, they just play Cube and oh guess what, two more Voidlord. Next turn, spellstone. I cannot imagine people call Cubelock a skill based deck. Where is the skill? Its just as braindead as any aggro deck. The deck has literally no unique plays whatsoever. Every game is a repeat of the previous one. Giving dejavu a bad name.
Current decks are finding it hard to add new cards since the power level of old cards is beyond the roof. MSoG should have been a prime example of overpowered cards, but Blizzard never learns.
I have commented on their design philosophy many times. Their give 3-4 cards in an expansion to a class for a specific playstyle, along with some neutral cards. This spawns a deck. Then they add a couple more cards in the next set, making the deck stronger. Which is fine. The problem is they do this with ONLY a few classes. Paladins, Warlocks and Priests get this type of treatment. Rest of the classes get 2 cards max to design a archetype around them. Nothing next few expansions. Hunter, Warrior and Shaman are prime examples of them. Look at the kit of Hunters, Warriors and Shaman and tell me this is not true.
Blizzards has favorites. Nothing wrong with that. Sure some people enjoy designing one class more then others. Like I enjoy Hunter and Warrior more then other classes, sometimes Shaman and Priest. But this means you need to have a fair number of people who enjoy designing a class. Right now their team has a very very heavy bias towards some classes. They completely banned Spell Hunter after just one expansion. Deadman Hands Warrior? On the other hand, Priest got so much favor they were able to do ANYTHING before the rotation. Warlock has been extremely powerful for years and has now reached unmanageable levels, same with Paladin.
A meta should have at least 4-6 tier 1 decks. That is a healthy meta. When was the last time this happened? They just don't care. Sometimes players whining is unjustified, but stats do not lie. Decks having more then 60% winrate should be nerfed immediately. That's more then what Undertaker Hunter had and the class is still suffering from what happened more then 4 years ago. Other classes do it? No problem, players aren't skilled enough to find an answer.
Stupid design philosophy has been part of Hearthstone for a long long time. Its about time it should end.
0
0
0
Update!
I tried Dire Frenzy in Big Hunter and Quest Hunter.
Big Hunter:
In Big Hunter, I die to aggro or own control without buffing any of my beast. I remember using the spell three times. Won me the game 2 times, the third was me bming. Deck lacks in consistency but it has potential. The support set I am running right doesn't suit vs aggro (more on support sets later). Dire Frenzy and Beast combo is just not possible unless and until you buff the beast next turn. This RARELY happens. Playdead is not performing well, most of the times it just sits in my hand doing nothing, I have lost games because of it. Might try Terrorscale Stalker and see how it performs or alter the deck a bit more. The deck is fun and testing out different decks is fun, but Hunter is lacking in couple of departments.
Quest Hunter:
Quest Hunter you simply don't need Dire Frenzy. You are overwhelming in value with the brood and DK. At times I had so many cards I had a headache which one to use. The deck works, sometimes, magnificently. The built I have, I either steamroll or get owned and I mean get owned hard or I best my opponent so hard it gives me chills. I have had 20-25 mins games against some control decks. Those are fun, but loosing isn't fun after such a long game. I think some alterations will make the deck work better. Will try a different QH in a few days. I need to make a few changes and try again. Thinking of removing DK. It is just getting in the way when I need to do more damage to my opponent. And a lot of times the cards didn't give me the answer I needed. I believe DK has gotten worse after the expansion. So many useless minions. It is missing Kodo for the big removal or heal or both. Poison is good, but it's slow.
Hunter Support Sets:
Ok, this is the interesting part. Hunter now has a few support sets to go with each deck. You obviously have the Baku Hunter and the midrange archetype. Both are good. But both lack vs. other aggro or heavy heavy control decks. These decks are your typical deck built around the classic aggro and midrange style.
The decks I am playing BH and QH have their core. BH with Kath and crew. QH with 1 drops.
Now to help you reach the goal of both decks, you have some decent support sets and I will talk about them now.
1) Secret/Spellstone
This is your first support set. The 4 secrets you add in are Wandering Monster, Snake Trap, Venomstrike Trap and Freezing Trap as well the Spellstone. It gives you a control aspect and the ability to tempo your opponent. With the control having tremendous AoE, aggro having unlimited minions and tempo being tempo, it helps you fight around and maintain board superiority. It lacks vs big drops sometimes.
A total of 10 cards. You can add these in both QH and BH. Can add Explosive Trap if you feel like it. Rat Trap is still experimental but early assessment shows it is pretty strong later in the game.
2) Toxmonger + 1 Drops
The second support set. It's your typical single target control setup very Rogue like. Elven Archer, Stonetusk Boar, Toxmonger, Hunter's Mark and Crackling Razormaw. 10 cards again. Contest the board and remove big minions. With the rise of Spiteful Summoner and quick big drops entering the game, this set is pretty cool since it takes out those big minions. Those decks don't run removal so your Archer stays on the board and can take out another big minion. The set lacks vs. aggro. Not very damaging for the opponent's face, but that's why you have the other part of your decks.
3) Elementals
Yup, I tried it. It's not bad. Helps you fight aggro well. If you have Shaw on board, it's amazing. Not very damaging and focuses on value and aggro battles. You need to like the set ofcourse. Elementals in Hunter doesn't fun too fun.
4) Dragons
I love this set. You will have around 10-14 dragons or dragon related cards depending on your preference. But man they do a great job. I tried it with QH only and I was overwhelmed, had too much going on at the same time. DK, Cult Master, Toxmonger Set, Dragons. I couldn't believe I had it all in one deck. Was crazy. And as you can imagine, it was confusing as hell. Carrion Drake is such a tourist attraction for the opponent. They keep mousing over it. The card can break your opponent all by itself. The new 7 mana taunt is not bad either.
Now a review about some individual cards.
1) Cult Master
This card is beast in Hunter right now. I know you shouldn't trade as a Hunter but as control you need too, sometimes.
2) Tol'vir Warden
Don't run this card. Just use Cult Master. If the word disappointment need meaning, this card fits the bill.
3) Deathstalker Rexxar
I am disappointed with this card. Most of the time it is filling my hand with garbage. 6, 7, 8, 9 mana cards that do nothing. I would recommend not running this card for now. Any other impactful card is better. You already have draw with Cult Master.
4) Wing Blast
Another disappointment. As a Hunter you need minion on the board to contest the enemy, since you lack other forms of control. Flanking Strike is better.
5) Houndmaster Shaw
Seriously, if this guy stays on the board, you win most of the times. The enemy attracts to it like flies on a candy. Solid legendary.
6) Ravencaller
It has performed well. I think I might remove a couple of 1 drops from my QH because of this card. You can Stitched Tracker it. You need to have a strong set to support it. Guess a 3 mana 2/2 draw two 1 drops was too strong.
7) Tracking
Man I hate this card. It is pretty good for aggro and midrange when you need an answer or whatever. But in control I ended up loosing my combo cards so many times. Removed it and the deck has gotten better.
8) Stitched Tracker
Man I love this card. Giving the right minion a lot of times. With this and Cult Master, you draw problems are solved.
And finally, the talk of the thread
9) Dire Frenzy
Not a bad card. It works well. Unfortunately, no deck needs it. The effect is control and value oriented. QH doesn't need it since there are no fatigue wars going on in this meta. BH just needs to pull out one or two big minions max to end the game. The card sits in my hand most of the time. I replaced with more impactful cards.
I need to streamline both decks, QH and BH. Both decks are lacking and performing at the same vs. different decks ofcourse! I am hovering around 45-50% winrate with them and the decks are not in their final stages. With some careful tweeks they can be Tier 2 decks. I am not the most skilled player, so any top player will provide a better view of the deck. I am hoping the decks can be around 52-54% winrate decks. Invested a lot of time, effort and dust into all this.
There it is. My thoughts on Hunter so far. Control Hunter lacks in either health regeneration or AoE. Either of the two would bring CH decks very close to Tier 1, even solid Tier 1 and definitely Tier 2. However, we need to work with what we have. And what we have are bits and pieces. We need to put the puzzle together. But that is the fun part :D!
Thanks for reading! Hope you all enjoyed reading all this. Your feedback is very important, so please comment!