Hearthpwn

the card back animation is one of my biggest disappointments in this game.

WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS BEAUTIFUL ANIMATION?!

may I also add the "easiest task ever"? :D

Eudora's task 15: "deal 40 damage in one turn"

thats it. there is no restrictions for it. Eudora does not even have to be in your party. Instant completion. wow :D

Quote from ArcyroX >>

Quote from kwikill >>

the funny thing? -I- replied to that very post explaining how/why it happens, and forgot about it before posting again.

 

I blame holiday stress.

 yea it happens (:

lemme add another thing then :D gruul's 14th task I think, was "kill 40 dragons with dragonslayer shot" which sounds like a hard grind too. however, the game counted every single dragon kill by any means, I dunno why :D I had gruul in my team that's all I can say. even them attacking and killing themselves counted. so thats that, no need to worry when you get to that task.

 also appearantly I have already talked about this one too :D

Quote from kwikill >>

Doing Gruul's 14th now.. apparently it's really just "kill 40 dragons".. Gruul doesn't even have to be in your party.

..who knows if this gets "fixed" tomorrow, though...

 yea I think it also says "...using dragonslayer shot" but that ability is not needed. even the dragons attacking and dying counts towards the task if I remember correctly.

(also, I tried to kill dragons summoned by voone but they dont count :/ they have to be enemy dragons FYI)

Quote from Xauriel >>

Quote from ArcyroX >>

I sometimes face opponents with name: "Your Opponent"

now I wonder, does this mean my opponent has turned the streamer mode on, or is it just some network error and game couldnt load my opponent's name?

 Aye, they have streamer mode activated

 alright thanks for the answer ^^

I sometimes face opponents with name: "Your Opponent"

now I wonder, does this mean my opponent has turned the streamer mode on, or is it just some network error and game couldnt load my opponent's name?

damn what nostalgia that was, seeing and remembering the old decks and the meta

my guess is that they will make the gamemode better by adding DE coin options, craftable portrait options only when they think the gamemode is about the die. it will be their last push to keep the game playable. it can be said that they kinda did the same with the regular hs, by bringing the dupe protection to try to stop the decline of players.

but im afraid, until then, we wont be getting any positive changes to the game... so I dont have hope for it now

people are saying if you craft stuff with that "extra" dust, you would be on negative dust...

I wonder now, has anyone got down to the negatives? Anyone who crafted stuff quickly and spend their "unjustified" dust?

because I havent heard from anyone that they're on the negatives, so now I'm wondering whether those people got away with their free dust?

I mean 4 mana Sorcerer's Apprentice is prolly enough, but why oh why blizz keeps insisting on making the reduction to 0 mana possible? most of the community was wanting a nerf that reads "but not less than (1)"

they printed Summoning Portal once, and they knew it would be important to prevent reduction to 0 mana. Just use the same logic, please blizz

if no ban to questline hunter in wild then make Aimed Shot 2 mana and hit minions only ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Wildpaw Gnoll

Double Agent

Shadowcrafter Scabbs

Defias Cannoneer

Harbor Scamp

Sorcerer's Apprentice

Quest hunter will prolly be banned in wild

Quote from PetiteMouche >>

Quote from BlueTwo >>

Show us on the doll where an 8 cost 3/5 minion that rarely ever sees play hurt you

 You completely missed the point. I assume this was on purpose, being the internet alpha male and stuff, but still, don't be embarrassing like that, it's a public space, there are people around here.

If the card effect is bugged and does not represent the card text, it needs to be fixed, period.

If it's confirmation bias, all the op needs is a screenshot/video of the card eating a minion that isn't the biggest on the board. This didn't happen yet, so the discussion is still valid and ungoing, and you sir need to participate in a meaningful way or leave.

 completely agree. some people are missing the point here. the point is, the rng element for the card might be broken, and all we can do is provide statistics and see the distibution of the results. if there is something unusual, like I said, such as Nat Darkfisher, we should see it.

I posted here, and read comments here to see whether other people are experiencing unusual stuff. after reading the post, I literally saw a small example of a "rare chance". of course, 1/36 chance does not mean much by itself. however, if this "rare" situation happens to many people enough, then there might be something off.

Quote from ValueBased >>

 

Quote from ArcyroX >>

at first I was also like "bruh"

but then I faced that card 3 times today, and it actually ate the biggest, all 3 times. (1st: 33%, 2nd: 16%, 3rd time: 50% chance)

 1/3 * 1/6 * 1/2 = 1/36

Rare, but not unrealistic.

 true, hope its just a misconception tho.

but I'm doubtful now because this game had some issues with rng in the past. remember Nat the Darkfisher bug? it was activating 95% of the time instead of 50% :D

at first I was also like "bruh"

but then I faced that card 3 times today, and it actually ate the biggest, all 3 times. (1st: 33%, 2nd: 16%, 3rd time: 50% chance)

now I feel like: