Hearthpwn

Between this and the spellstone, they're begging us to bring back Malygos druid.

Create your own, make a second account to join it, done.

Quote from henomar >>

I've read since that Americans are entitled to a full refund any time the license is altered - regardless of any language in the agreement.

Why do people think companies can get away with murder just because they say they can? Probably because in the U.S., and countries like Mexico, laws vs corporations haven't been enforced in a very long time; except in civil courts. They system is remarkably corrupt. The govt isn't interested in doing its job. But the civil courts still work some of the time if you're rich enough to afford 'em.

This isn't an isolated legal issue, Steam offered no refunds for a long time, but the common law principle that goods must be suitable for the purpose they were sold for is spread out all over the west and goes back a long time; so refunds have to be available. It was Australia that finally took Steam/Valve to court over the lack of refunds.

There is so much beknighted certainty in this world! Or at least in this forum. Nearly all of it thoroughly mistaken. Where do you get your certainty? Wouldn't you rather do some research and have knowledge?

It's so remarkable to me how people think they can just make **** up, and it'll somehow turn out to be true. Everybody, or most people in at least one country, thinks they're Trump or Putin.

If this said, "Destroys the card at the bottom of your deck," 99% of people would not care about it.

Quote from Rusery >>

There are a ton of reasons why this game is popular, despite its aggressive monetary policy. When looking at Gwent, or ES:CG, it seems a little empty. I know all about the Witcher and Elder Scrolls franchise, its characters and monsters dating back to the originals, but its characters are mostly flavorless. 

In HS i find the lightheartedness/comedy aspect very intriguing. They aren't trying to take it seriously, because its a digital card game. Pop culture references add even more to this. The last thing would be that WoW has a connection to a lot of these filthy millennials (me included), and its something we've gotten fond of over the years, even if we've long since stopped playing WoW, or any of its other games. 

TL:DR - People spend money here because its highly familiar, fun, and easy to get into. 

Quote from SlickRick >>

Quote from lmaobear >>

I don't enjoy it, but I don't fall to his level either. Your behavior is just as childish as his.

 dude i can't control my anger when someone is acting like he is a god but he is just a lucky bastard.

Since they announced double gold, I have been offered just one (1) non-40 gold quest.  Statistically, I should get a 40 gold quest in 1 out of every three.  I got 40/40 on Wed, then 50/40 Thu, then 40/40 Fri, then 40/40 Sat, then 40/40 Sun, then 40/40 Mon, then 40/40 today.  And worse of all, THREE TIMES I've gotten a quest like Meek where I can't just not play the class to avoid it.  Unbelievable.

Quote from Dr_Beardface >>

Quote from lordballs1664 >>

Oh your 27th ice block has stopped me winning again.... yaaay.

 There should be a limit to how many Ice Blocks can be generated by Babbling Book, Cabalist's Tome, etc. during one game.  I don't know how many times I've had lethal and been stalled by multiple ice blocks until I end up losing.  

In most QR games I play, I have a 5th bounce available anyway, and almost always playable on the same turn as the fourth.  

I will boldly predict right now that this does not kill the deck and does not end the bitching.  Or rather, it doesn't kill the deck where it is played now, which is almost exclusively in ranks 16-20, because QR is not competitive outside the bottom half of the ladder.  

A nerf (or lack of one) is not validation of anybody's opinion.  Blizzard didn't like the quest as it was because it was effectively preventing an entire deck archetype of deck from competing.  Not because it wasn't balanced as it was.

For the record, I felt the quest condition was fine - it was the reward that was unbalanced, and not because 5/5 is too much; because it was not subject to most removal in the game.

3,5 mana minion, and two minions worth 2 or 2,5 mana. Overall 8 mana value split over multiple bodies (which can be both a good and a bad thing) with trivial condition. Seems good.

But that's only considering the original power level and curve of Hearthstone. From the very start expensive minions were understatted in Hearthstone as the developers were afraid that they'd be too game swinging and hard to remove, thus War Golem is missing a stat and taunt on Lord of the Arena costs not only 1 but 2 stat points. But it should be the exact opposite for two reasons: firstly, there's already the extra stat on each card to compensate for value loss of playing small minions, and secondly, big minions are slow and more situational as you need to have the mana to play them. The power creep and OP 1 drops don't really fix the situation.

So, I think this card will be playable, but crazy good is definitely an exxaggeration.

It's going to be different this time. Expect a midrangish met

This is basically like the newspaper things for gadgetzan and I didn't see anybody complain about those.  You haters are so boring you just want blizz to come out and say these are the cards go buy em. Let them have fun making their game.  But the entitled nerd feels entitled so you just hate. Go play magic if you're so unhappy. 

As a long time blizz and hearthstone fan I am very stoked on seeing more of these silly vids.