Hearthpwn

Why? Looks faithful to the source.

I'm sorry but why are people complimenting an article with the same level of analysis as is already given on the description of the cards?

Maybe you should have started with the cracker jokes. Well fine you go keep on stomping on underpowered noobs, experimenters and people actually looking for fun in casual and wasting their time, instead of having the balls to face ranked - just had a great Shaman mirror there.

Sorry dude I didn't realise that I was conversing with someone who can only reply 'no you are'. Please ask your parents to supervise your internet usage...

I am a tryhard - I play ranked plenty.

Not interested in your new, restrictive and irrelevant definitions - there is a clear demand for actual casual games that are not 'casually' predated upon by people with top meta decks for easy gold and for a separate unranked mode.

Not playing this but you need more draw mechanics.

Quote from Narg >>

Quote from Antiquary >>

 

Yes Blizzard should have a ranked, unranked and somehow make a separate casual mode where top meta decks have no place.

 Blizzard has not one but two such game modes. They're called Arena and Tavern Brawl.

You know very well that they are not constructed... you can have your tryhard unranked for when you are feeling fragile and people who want to experiment, who want to use other cards, who want something different than a stale meta could go play the 100s of unused cards in a true casual mode - it's not as though the queue times are long, they aren't.

How dense can you be not to get it - we have a meta game in ranked - even this last day of all days when a lot of people will want to play many cards going out of rotation I am getting tryharding opponents in casual - fun, unpredictable games are out of the window AND WE HAVE THE SAME STALE CRAP.

Tryharding is not casual - let it sink in... instead of coming up with your npc forum clichés like 'salty'.

Yes Blizzard should have a ranked, unranked and somehow make a separate casual mode where top meta decks have no place.

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from Antiquary >>

Hclegend - you are lying or you are unaware - so maybe stop proclaiming like you know. I face a few people with just basic and classic cards in casual - the latest when I was at rank 7 at the start of the month - it wasn't fun for him and not for me - stop pretending that there isn't a problem.

That's a pretty subjective-based remark dressed up as implied fact.
Maybe stop pretending there IS a problem when the only problem you have is based purely on personal experience.

Essentially, casual works entirely as intended. The ability to play whatever you want, however you want without it affecting your rank. 
There is no "problem" other than one that is entirely self-conceived by over-entitled players who think that the game should only adhere to their preferred style of play.

 Please, no bot replies.

Hclegend - you are lying or you are unaware - so maybe stop proclaiming like you know. I face a few people with just basic and classic cards in casual - the latest when I was at rank 7 at the start of the month - it wasn't fun for him and not for me - stop pretending that there isn't a problem.

Why are you posting up the 2nd most popular Priest deck as though it's something new? You want us to upvote this so people can see it? Where have you been the last 3 months?... If you are going to pull this kind of stunt at least be open about it, present it as though you have added value to give or a proper study of the deck... the way you have done this lowers your credibility.

Blizzard need to implement a 3rd mode and make it ranked, unranked and casual.

Yes, practicing is a good reason for top decks in casual - but some people need to stop pretending that there isn't a clear need for a mode where people can play and experiment with interesting and often unused cards, to gradually hone their own decks, without having to face so many people tryharding with the same efficient, and often boring, tier 1 decks.

'crying' = instant ignore of the whole post.

With Twilight Drake and Acolyte? Lyra would definitely be better.

Terrible at establishing board presence in my experience - too many similar decks out there.