Hearthpwn

Unpopular opinion alert: this card is insanely overrated. Not everything in Dragon Priest is a Dragon. Dragon Priest REALLY needs the board, so this card is actually somewhat situational. It could be good, but it could also be terrible. Overall, I rated it Playable, but the amount of people who voted Meta-defining is disturbing.

Quote from ZeroAndKira >>

You mean RenoDragonN'ZothDivineShield Pally?

Would you recommend including any of the new cards?

Everyone, it's literally just the deck recipe. If you wanted to do that, you could have just made the deck recipe and played constructed. IMO very boring brawl.

Quote from Fheny123 >>

Still waiting for priests new 7/7 

The UNKNOWN bug? It's not a bug, it's a feature! (On a serious note, Blizzard, please don't make it to go back to normal. Just don't show people's names during an Arena game, nobody needs to know anyways. You can see it on "recently played" afterwards anyways, and this has been SO good for Arena streamers.)

I think that super-face decks are probably the most cancerous, but Midrange Hunter is close. As someone who loves Priest, Midrange Hunter is just SO hard to win, and an almost no-skill deck! Even if Miracle Rogue is a slightly worse matchup, Midrange Hunter induces by far the most rage and salt, because at least hyper-aggro is easier to beat.

And they didn't find the bug during testing... wait. I, and many others, always joke about how "no testing or QA at Blizzard", but is it actually true?! It seems like it...

Well, I am semi-poor, so I have no Grommash or Ragnaros. While they are both pretty high on my to-craft list, I don't have either yet. What do you think of replacing them with Alexstraza and Gorehowl?

The average card quality is through the roof! Just make sure you start ahead, you REALLY want a turn 1 play, because if you lose tempo, you have no board clears to get back in the game. Overall, I think you could do pretty well.

1. The 1 mana 5/3 (Tunnel Trogg)

2. The 4 mana 7/7 (Flamewreathed Faceless)

3. The 3 mana 8/5 (Darkshire Councilman)

Turns out THAT much tempo is preeeety good!

So, I was thinking about one eternal controversy in Hearthstone. That is, whether new players should be able to get old card backs. Often long time players will say, "Well, giving a rerun of old card backs makes it so that I have no reward for being here for a long time." On the other side, new players will say, "But that card back looks really cool, and goes well with the theme of my deck!" So, I thought of a compromise. Maybe, Blizzard could do reruns of old card backs, except in a corner of the card back, there would be a little 2. This way, everyone would know that this person did not have the game when the card back first came out, satisfying the veterans, with their original versions, but the new players are able to have that nice design. Over time, they might rerun it again, but with a 3 on the corner, then 4, and so on.

TL;DR: Rerun card backs except with number in corner to symbolize not being the original copy.

What do you all think of this idea?

Well, let's not get too far ahead of ourselves. Almost nothing is "necessary". However, I do agree Warlock Hero Power should be nerfed, in health cost, or mana cost, or maybe even both. I think that maybe it is the one hero power on the game that could probably survive being 3 mana, or 4 health, although of course Blizzard is NEVER going to nerf a Hero Power. I'm sure it would be "too confusing for new players".

Ok, thanks!

Is there a good replacement for Soggoth? I don't have it, and I don't have much dust to craft it...