• 1

    posted a message on Thank god Diablo is limited time.
    Quote from Andrei2007 >>
    Quote from AngelGabrielUK >>

    Ive fought him and won - and fought him and lost.

    Picked him as my hero....had a top 8, top 4 and top 1

    Hes not as bad or as good as people say....but i also will be glad to see the back of him - mainly because of those god-awful demon secrets. 

     

     

     wow 3 games. we have a conclusion boys

     Sad that some people literally need everything explaining as they dont have an IQ in double digits, but the point i was making was that ive had every type of result with him as my hero across countless games....from last to first and those in between. Am very sorry that i literally didnt make that patently clear for you.

    Hope that helps you. Doubt it, but we live in hope.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Thank god Diablo is limited time.

    Ive fought him and won - and fought him and lost.

    Picked him as my hero....had a top 8, top 4 and top 1

    Hes not as bad or as good as people say....but i also will be glad to see the back of him - mainly because of those god-awful demon secrets. 

     

     

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Battlegrounds Meta Sept 5 2021 - Your thoughts

    Agree that the patch has seemingly balanced the tribes more. Every tribe in isolation now feels strong enough to win a lobby. Some stronger than others - the usual highrollers will always prevail - but there is something there for every tribe now.

    The only build that does now really feel not viable is Menagerie. Even if you pick up an early Lightfang, just feels that pretty much all other tribe builds can outscale Menagerie builds and wreck them. Shame, but cant have everything i guess!

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Battlegrounds in a nutshell
    Quote from Tallaris >>
    Quote from Random_Huffer >>
    Quote from Tallaris >>

    Lmao. Normal HS is the trashiest of trash compared to BG.

    Idd from time to time there will be this lobby with high rollers but usually, you deserve your loss or win.

    Normal HS on the other hand? 90% of the time: his hand was better than mine, he had better randomly created stuff, his deck was a counter to mine, my deck has no tool to handle my opponent strategy, he won despite misplays.

    NORMAL HS IN A NUTSHELL.  

     why are you so mad dude? If you are frustrated feel free to go in the Salt threat.

    This thread is criticism toward BG if you haven't noticed.  Just replaying accordingly to the thread tone. Why would you think I'm mad? Because of large letters at the end? KEKW

     I understood your post and agree with it. I cant claim to have the worlds highest BGS MMR (float between 6.5 - 7.5k) but i often feel at the end of any game my position is about what i deserved from my play, the hero and shop offered. Occasionally i run into a super high roller that just obliterates my board and defeats me unexpectedly - but then there are times i do that to others also. 

    But i definitely agree that BGS is more 'in your own hands' compared to Constructed - i only really now play constructed to complete certain quests.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on State of BG
    Quote from Psy_Kik >>

    Removing cards prizes was fine, but they also removed the likes of Zerus..the game feels a bit stale.

    It's highlighted my main issue with the mode - the first few turns you have no freedom. See a sellemental or token on 1, you must buy. on 6 gold you can't roll, you must buy whatever shit is in tavern, level after that and again buy whatever shit is in tavern, then you must go to four asap, sometimes a turn early but you need to be on 4 so you can tripple into a 5 if you get a tripple.

    Tavern tiers 1 to 3 become irrrelevant, unless playing a hero like Arianna. When you hit that tripple on 4 you get either a baron or a nomi or a brann or Hoggar or lightfang...or hell even a Mythrax or Razorgore you can finally start to actually play the game.

    The mode is becoming played out, it needs more complexity. Badly. I don't really mean Prizes back, that is just more power spikes. I'm talking more tavern tiers. I'm talking more health for the heroes. I'm talking more cool minions with cool effects. I'm talking making the endgame more than just stats vs poisonous vs divine shields. Blizzard will look at the numbers and think "people are still loving playing, we shouldn't change it up too much" but this would be a mistake - they need to be brave and innovate.

     This + 100%. 

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Every BG Achievement Finally Completed...A couple tips if your interested...

    Nice post, and congrats on the achievement.

    One of your points is one that gives me the most troubles - not really hero specific - but just in general :

    *Taking best option on the board until you can work into that win condition is important. When you lose a round, getting hit for 5-7 HP is way easier to manage then those killer 18-20 shots.*

    Whilst acknowledging that all games are different, and much depends on the hero you're playing as well as what Bob offers, i find that in the early rounds - and pretty much until i get to Tier 4, i try and focus on the best units available, and keeping my HP as high as possible, without committing to a certain build.

    But then, once i look to move to a certain build, i find myself panicking if i dont get the types of minion needed - and often default to a Menagerie type board, in the hope i can find an early Lightfang and scale that way - on the basis that usually you get can a decent class minion type per roll - and one or two per round.

    Sometimes it works - but often i end up falling behind after a strong start.

    What would be your advice with this? As said, i know alot depends on many variables that cant all be represented on here, but i feel like that unless i really high roll, i get caught between a rock and a hard place and end up not getting the results i could do with a better strategy.

    Im a circa 7k player - which may also be part of the problem and explain a few things!! :)

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on First attack is too important

    It feels a little like a no win situation then. Game is chuntered at as first attack is too OP in certain areas - but then put in a measure to balance it up, and the game becomes 'solvable'. 

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't Blizz :)

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on First attack is too important

    I dont understand why Blizz cant implement a system whereby after R1 (which is just random), whomever has the lower placing attacks first. 

    Unless you're Illidan of course.

    But that aside, can anyone point out any flaws to this, which seems (IMO) much fairer than it being apparent RNG, or bias, or whatever its currently based on....? 

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on One Game for a Top 3

    for sure - but (for me anyway) its usually only when its Heads Up that an opponent will play a ghoul specifically to counter me - but maybe thats because im only a 7k ranked player playing in that standard of lobby lol. But yes, take your point. I still think hes a safe top 3 hero though.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on One Game for a Top 3

    great answers guys....love the insight.

    I still think George is a very safe bet - whatever build you go for, having divine shields on tap is never a bad thing, and i rarely seem to have a bad run with him - but respect other opinions for sure. 

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on One Game for a Top 3

    Bit of fun...if of no interest simply ignore please!

    You have ONE game of Battlegrounds where you HAVE to get a Top 3 - you can choose any Hero.

    Who do you select?

    For me, i would go for George the Fallen. 

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Galakrond is just stupid

    He's not stupid - just strong after his buff. He was pretty much non existent pre the last update - much as many of the old strong heroes are now. 

    Just his time in the sun - enjoy it whilst it lasts.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on The Battlegrounds Salt Thread

    I agree with the above - there is way too much emphasis and advantage to who hits first.

    I know this has been debated before, and im not sure if there is an easy answer or not, but to my mind, is it not a case of random for R1, then whoever has the low placing from R2 onwards has the first attack?

    Unless, of course, youre facing Illidan.....

     

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: AngelGabriel #2509
    Region: EU
    Trade Only?: Yes, you go first - do not add if you don't have quest

    ONLINE NOW

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Who is the best Hearthstone-Streamer?

    WobbleWeezy a great streamer....very entertaining.

    RDU maybe the best overall.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.