Hearthpwn

Quote from Dudu42 >>

Care to explain how rogue is n° 1 in arena? Personally, I think they are the worst there.

Quote from MrBobee >>

The #1 card I forget exists is Captain Greenskin.  Since he's legendary, you almost never see him in the Arena, and he's too big and slow to fit in the few pirate decks you run into (or folks just don't have him).

My zoo list is very close to yours. I only run -1 Flame Imp +1 Big Game Hunter so your deck is working for sure :)

Ranked:
1. Paladin
2. Druid
3. Warrior
4. Mage
5. Warlock
6. Hunter
7. Priest 
8. Rogue
9. Shaman

Arena:
1. Mage
2. Paladin
3. Rogue
4. Druid
5. Shaman
6. Hunter
7. Warlock
8. Priest
9. Warrior

This deck is really fun to play, but i think i miss something. Can you make video guide?

Quote from xakronar >>

I have Naxx and Blackrock, but no other legendaries (yet) ... do you guys think this deck can work without Saraad, Antonidas and Boom?

What would be the best cheap replacements? Loatheb could work I think .... but what else? Any ideas for someone on a budget? :)

Ysera

I don't think secret pally is OP at all. I think druid is more powerful at the moment and even druid not powerful enough to nerf it. 
Patron was disguisting, and I so happy they finally nerf it (I say it despite my winrate vs patron was OK, how happy must be aggro deck players?). 

Ravenholdt Assassin.

I really don't understand why King of Beasts is so hated, im OK with this art and don't really feel Savannah Highmane looks better.

Blizzard responded to ADWCTA's #arenawarriorsmatter campaign and we see some results so i guess we need someone to start #nerfpatrontooblivion campaign or #nerfwarsongcommander at least :)

It's gotten to the point who is quickest on buying/selling/buffing. I don't care for it anymore. Keep it simple stupid.

I prefer the old one by far. I don't find it very much fun facing off people with minions that have hundreds, maybe even thousands, of health. Tarecgosa+HP imp+Baron Rivendare is just fatiguing to face, especially if you lowroll and it's not a Murloc round so that you can poison them to death and you aren't lucky with spores.

Remove Consume Magic Eye Beam Chaos Nova for Proving Grounds Troll Centurion package and Fel Barrage instead of Metamorphosis. It becomes even better. 

Playing minions never got punished by freeze mage in the same way that a hunter's quest is advanced if you play minions. 

I hate the current design team.  The amount of discount and extra mana they have added to the game is beyond the pale.

ENOUGH

   WITH

                     THE

                   MANA

                   CHEAT

                  PLEASE!

I absolutely agree. almost half the meta revolves around punishing the other player's initiative (quest hunter, control warrior, otk DH). 

In many older decks tempo and aggression were rewarded, and were either a primary or secondary win condition. These days besides a deck or two (which are 2nd/3rd tier usually), feels like every deck just builds up to their very specific win condition, which usually can't be countered or played around easily, if at all.

And if speaking about miserable, than arena has never been so miserable. RNG has become king, and you can't play around anything anymore.

What I've noticed lately is not that the game is not 'uninteractive', but that it is ANTI interactive.  There are many more ways now to be hurt for actually putting a minion on board.  This was much rarer in old hearthstone.  In old hearthstone, you could get value or tempo punished (over extending into AOE, 10-drop into hex), but you were mostly not actively hurt (there are some exceptions, like Mind Control effects)

Quote from RendInFriend >>

Quote from grokl77 >>

Quote from RendInFriend >>

I hear a lot of people who don’t play the deck but lose to it in this thread. This isn’t solitaire, this is most definitely control, it’s just accelerated to come online turn 6 instead of turn 10.

 

 That is a big assumption, try reading through the posts again. But I do get why you would think so.

I could also assume, that a  lot of people are saying it is fine, because they don't want Kazakusan and its treasures to be more balanced, because it would ruin the fun they are having playing with it.

I am playing Kazakusan and counter decks. I get why Kazakusan decks are fun, but that kind of fun belongs in duels a non competitive format. Many of the treasures are too strong for standard, imho.

It’s balanced because it is a much bigger condition than people realize and the treasures are very powerful but not too strong. Spells that cost 8-10 mana are supposed to end games, and really, there’s only two spells that end the game right then. People think they are too strong because they are used to a meta where control decks didn’t have a consistent game changing threat at turn 6 and can close out games before turn 10. This is similar to bolner shaman if the requirements weren’t play 2 corrupted cards and have 3 cards in hand; but instead were play one corrupted card and have no other minions. You still have to survive long enough to play everything.

I’m going to reiterate, if you think the deck is unfair, re-evaluate what your decks and play styles do. This is simply a strong control deck that isn’t nearly as greedy as previous iterations. The power level isn’t near the power level of the last degenerate rogue or handlock before demon seed nerf. It’s probably about the same as owl lock before the rod nerf, but definitely weaker to interruption.

Its fine if you're having fun with the card man, but that sentence is all kinds of wrong. Playing no minions in Priest/Druid is arguably a plus cuz it makes tutoring Kaz easier, its not even a real trade-off for them. I see no problem with powerful payoffs as long as the price for them is right, and rn its far too cheap.

Also wasnt the point of Kaz to make ppl start playing dragons? Why is it an Elysiana on hyper steroids? Very confusing theme and design.