Hearthpwn

He is always negative so don’t bother to argue with him. Just take a look at his comment history. Nice work btw 

Why do you even play the game when you obviously hate it so much?

That kind of stuff is why hearthstone is fun. 99.999 % don’t care for competetive 

There you go again: blabla „complain in bad English“ blabla „ random combination of letters as an argument“ blabla „I am right because I am right“ blabla

Better they release powerful stuff and tone it down then making unplayable garbage. Just salt here 

Quote from dmhWarrior >>

Quote from Anarchy1 >>

And o doubt you read that much of it in the last 2,5 months you are on this forum. 

 Heres the deal:  For the vast majority of decks/games you can tell whos going to win by turn 3/4, max.  How so?  Easy:  I play Res priest because I have no other choice as its a braindead cancer deck that does well against other braindead decks.  So, if I pull a fatty minion by turn 3/4 against any aggro deck they are DONE.  Game over.  If I do not, I am done, game over.  BP is an auto loss to Druid and usually the rare control warrior.  Its an auto win against secret mage as they cannot deal with your board & their secrets dont bother you.  This is all very simple and based on actual game play & experience. 

Its OK - it is what it is.  But to pretend that you or some other "genius" can play around my big board on turn 4 or that you can play around a loaded Pirate/Totem board on turn 3/4 without GOOD DRAWS/REMOVAL is just a lie.  You know it. 

 So you are funny. You complain about the game being no skill, while playing big priest. A deck that a) takes no skill (even pirate rouge is a high skill cap deck in comparison) and b) not only punishes aggro but also anything slow while promoting combo - what you claimed you dislike

1. you are not forced to play cancer, you want to. We play at similar levels, and unless you want a high legend finisher, you can play litteraly anything.

2. Many decks that aren’t aggro lose to turn 3 neptulon

3. You are right. There is no skill involved in your turn 3 highroll. But there is a lot of skill in the control vs big priest matchup when the bp doesn’t get his I win button.

4. Much of skill is about mulligan. And about  your turn 3/4 pirate/totem boards: you often have to decide when to clear and when to greed. Especially against even shaman, since that deck can go late.

5. Aggro isn’t brain dead. Aggro mirrors are very interesting because the control/beat down roles can swap a lot.

6. I repeat: Deckbuilding takes skill. Netdecking big priest doesn’t.

7. Meta is very diverse right now, with some reno decks being playable, aggro and combo is there too. And jank is playable, not like it was during stormwind

you obviously care enough to comment

No it isn’t. It’s a boring rule that kills combo decks

Otk on 8 is fine. Play disruption or aggro. That’s why they nerf the survivability. 

Playing big priest and complaining about „bullshit“ is hilarious. At least those other decks require some thought

Aaaaand as it always was and always will be: Ppl complain about things being unbalanced. There wasn’t a single moment in the last years where ppl were satisfied. I guess it’s human. 

Shaman is very easy to tech against though. Play any card that increases their spell costs on the turn they play Flash and they're usually boned.

As a wild player, I don't think that Inventor's Aura will make the cut in wild mech paladin. Radar Detector is the entire engine for that deck and is the most important card to get into your hand. Mech paladin essentially runs 26 mechs, 2 copies of Radar Detector and 2 copies of Stonehearth Vindicator to tutor Radar Detector with. Mech paladin in wild already has huge access to mech discounts with Mechwarper, Galvanizer, and Frequency Oscillator and can essentially dump their entire hand starting somewhere between turns 2-4. Radar Detector is easily the highest value card in the deck, and adding Inventor's Aura would break the guaranteed tutor into a 50/50 (plus reduce the average draw power of Radar Detector) I could be wrong, but I really can't imagine giving up a guaranteed tutor of 0-mana draw-5 so you can include a spell which doesn't do anything the deck isn't doing already.

If Inventor's Aura sees serious play in mech paladin I will eat a shoe.

Huuuh bro Elise is 5 mana this is 8, it doesn't have a deck building restriction but it's wayyy worse. Also the reno deck restriction is way overrated and is not much of a restriction at all if reno and zephrys are available. 

And better than Gloop yeah sure a little bit, can copy at most 3 minions instead of 2, for 1 more mana. Gloop is a very bad card by the way. (not bad in and of itself it's of course a powerful effect, it's just worse than virtually everything else druids can do)

Realistically knowing how druids play this is going to be played for the elise effect not the gloop one, because there are far more efficient ways to build a board than this card. And that means, it might see play just for the sake of enabling some combos by duplicating important cards, but it's very slow and manageable, I doubt this sees play in a meta deck.

settle down lol

(edit: he deleted his comment)

15yo boys having a problem with a picture of black woman:

Quote from Dieseloctane >>

Quote from SpaceTimeDream >>

I think you are underestimating the power of free early game minions.

Patches the Pirate, Parachute Brigand, Happy Ghoul, Frenzied Felwing, Corridor Creeper

 You wouldn't pay five health for ANY of those minions, and this isn't free. How is this any kind of comparison? 

 I would happily start games with 17 healths and two 3/3 minions and 3/2 Flame Imp. That is 9/8 stats on turn one.

The moment you start caring about your health total is the moment you failed to play aggro decks.

Health is a resource and you got 30 points of it.

Did the 2 damage to face really matter much though? It’s primarily used in Overheal or control decks, and honestly Overheal is too weak an archetype anyways for it to be relevant there. Control doesn’t really care about face damage, but they can appreciate shaving off a mana from it. So, it’s really only a buff. It’s disingenuous to call it a nerf. 

3 mana 3/4 and 1 mana 1/3 are not premium stats anymore my dude, they are average, a ton of cards have these stats without giving anything to the opponent.

I would play Spider Tank over this and that's the original 3 mana 3/4, one of the worst ones.

The 3 cards that have this effect will never see play.

If there is an obvious strong choice, either you give your opponent a strong card, or you're forced to pick a bad choice so the opponent doesn't guess it, aka you're forced to play a shit card. It's not like the game is lacking good discover cards, why play this instead of one that never gives your opponent a card for free.