• 0

    posted a message on Aggro vs Control
    Quote from Poodris >>

    You aren't playing a control deck. Youre playing a shit deck.

     ^Said it all. You cant consistently beat a decent deck with a fun deck. Aggro mage is real strong right now, imo.

    Quote from Popeye11627 >>

    So what I want to know is this: Aggro players, I want to know your perspective on the decks that you play and why you play them? Why are the fun in your opinion? What are your opinions on control decks and other deck styles? I promise I'm not hating, I just want to try and understand a different perspective.

     Aggro decks are the best (for me) Because they're the most interactive. Its like playing a tough chess match, and try to outvalue your oponent. Every 1 damage dealt to face matters. you're automatically unfavored when they heal/taunt/armor up. it is always satisfying to win before they do their greedy combo. Sadly, blizzards seems inclined to keep control and combo going strong (emphasis on combo), wich (again, in MY OPINION)  makes the game less interactive. If you got combo you win, if you control an aggro player and he cant kill you before turn 10 you win. My question for you is: What is the fun on simply destroying your opponent if you did draw 4 certain cards in the correct time?

    Aggro and midrange will always be my favs, because of this. They arent brainless, and the "skill ceiling" is certainly higher than drawing combo.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Mill Druid is back (63% winrate)

    while i agree with you this is boring, it does requires skill. The win condition is surviving while the opponent burn his health, but then you had 20~30 turns to hit their face (they even draw cards for you) so if you lose, the fault is mostly yours.

    Posted in: Mill Druid is back (63% winrate)
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.