Hearthpwn

You are not targetable by the rogue or druid hero power. The thing is, that these things dont target enemies, they buff their own hero, then the hero attacks. The attack actually is not directly related to the hero power

Poisonous is super obvious though, like pretty much everyone would guess in some way it impacts the interactions with minions and makes it more favorable

Patches seems good now, but bloodmage will literally be good forever, I promise. Good patient rational choice, i applaud you. 

1. Unrealistic expectation, it makes them have to commit to timelines, which will make card quality suffer because they have to rush. They have talked about this in the past, they fear release schedule will infuriate fans, and diminish quality, both are correct.

2. Sure, kinda vague though, not really useful

3. I think this is something they plan on implementing in some way already.

4. Could never hurt

Maybe formatting was the wrong word, idk, it just isn't easy on the eyes though.

You tried really hard I feel, but this sort of post could have been way better with clean looking formatting

Using the coldblood buff onto vancleef was a mistake, it is literally almost impossible for vancleefs that big to get two attacks in, so that's a maximum a boost of four damage, which is delayed and susceptible to stall via blizzard/frost nova, whereas coldblood on any other minion was an immediate four damage. This would also make Cleef stronger (which doesnt matter tbh).

Also, against freeze mage, sapping draw (thalnos) is almost always a good idea (if you have spare mana), they barely have any good sap Thalnos and give them a chance to get back in the game (this game was hopeless for them, but in general, its bad behavior)

I know this sounds like shitty advice, but without Velen or Alextranza, you should really just try to play a different deck. Perhaps regular Dragon Priest, it is likely stronger than this deck anyway.

You're thinking too hard. Things is OP, the few times the Finley messes things up are not worth bothering over. I have seen many high quality players use both. If anything you'd cut Finley tbh, but I would just try both. Often in aggro Finley is a later play than you'd think, and even if not, you still have 4 totems in your deck.

"at least as much play as Sylvanas" be careful with this kinda thing. Sylv is a OP meta defining card. A card needs to be broken to outclas her, this will not do so I think

Well, we all know what will get nerfed: Shield Slam and Lightning Storm because balance.

If you don't like making Keywords for effects that are only on a few cards, why did you change "Destroy any minion damaged by this" to Poisonous and why does Counter exist as a Keyword at all, being that it exists on only 1 card Counterspell.

It's always nice to get free packs, no matter what some players said!

you lost because you're stupid, all you had to do was close and open HS a few times.

Tl;Dr

Prince into captain into corridor creeper into scalebane into spiteful summoner into bonemare, copy and paste into every deck along with the following cards:

Mage: secrets and aluneth

Warlock: demons and guldan

Priest: ffa and mind control

Paladin: call to arms and valynar

Hunter: some beasts

Warrior: some pirates

Shaman: sorry, what's a shaman?

Rogue: backstabs and vilespines

Druid: mark of lotus and livingmana

...is the meta. Welcome to kobolds and catacombs:):) enjoy!

I'm starting to believe that limited weapon/card design freeing up (nerf to BF) wasn't to give Rogue cool new weapons. They Just needed to free it up for the other classes so that Rogues didn't accidentally get any of these better weapons by accident from accidentally getting Malkrok from the gimmick uncompetitive burgle. Cause some people just like to have fun in casual and having a Rogue rng a spirit claws would destroy the very fabric of the universe.

Real Virmen have curves. +1!