Why not use the salt thread? Or watch a content creator navigate the deck and see where you're going wrong? It's a good deck so it's clearly an issue on your end or that you've only played a few games and have a really small sample size.
- Ace100ace200
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years and 18 days
Last active Thu, Nov, 9 2023 04:46:48 -
- 12
- 49
- 85
- 5 Followers
- 673 Total Posts
- 708 Thanks
-
9
And2320 posted a message on Weekly and Daily Quest Status - Missing Quests & CompensationPosted in: NewsBlizzard has turned Hearthstone into a disgusting pay2win mobile game.
-
9
xanzan1 posted a message on Blizzard Reduced The Price Of Tavern Pass For The Rest Of The Scholomance Expansion CyclePosted in: NewsI liked it when we could get it by buying packs. I wish they would have kept both models.
-
3
Atramentar posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card DiscussionIf you want to be taken seriously, avoid saying stuff like "I don't like this", "I despise", "it's not nice". Instead, use something more along the lines of "it's not fun to play against", "it's uninteractive", "it's unbalanced" (regardless of that being true or not).
-
3
Biomass posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card DiscussionQuote from Alexandru_91 >>Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga.She can only see 1 Pyroblast not 2, duplicate cards do not show up twice so the Priest will have no idea you are holding 1 or 2 Pyroblasts.
I don’t think OP knows a lot about the game anyway.
-
8
P4dge posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card DiscussionThe replies are salt, not my opinion. Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga. This means he or she will do anything to not get below 20, it immediatly kills a suprise otk because he or she has seen my hand. Same counts for any other card that has been seen, only a shuffle deck and secret passage counters it somewhat.
If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand, make the card 1 cost less I don't care, but don't show my hand.
If it was meant to be shown we would playing with the cards showing.
Just my 2 cents.
PS: To the few who write STFU, FU, who do you think you are telling me what I can think or say, go to China where no opinions are wanted.
What do you mean by 'if it was meant'? Are you saying the card isn't meant to do this or the game isn't meant to have this mechanic? Neither are true, however much you want to hold on to the opinion that you're correct, you simply aren't.
This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action. They specifically designed it to do so.
By your own logic you should be fine with this then because it is intended.
No one is telling you what you should think or say but you must realise that the more stupid or asinine the thing someone says is, the more it will be dismissed and/or ridiculed. You have the right to think stupid things and other people have the right to treat them as such. If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change. This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread. Why didn't you put it there? Are you needing attention and feel a new thread is more likely to deliver on that front?
-
14
Kedalin posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card Discussion"If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand"
No. If that's what we want, we'll play Mind Vision. We play Madame Lazul to find out what you have in your hand, and then take one of those. The information gained is the whole point. If you don't want someone to see your Pyro/Pyro/Naga, then you should do anything to not get below 4 cards in hand.
And honestly, if I'm playing Lazul, it means I'm also probably playing Chameleos. I've been spying on your hand the entire game, and you don't even know how much I know about your hand.
You're not entitled to a surprise OTK. You don't deserve it. And you're not guaranteed to get it, even if you have the cards in hand. Sometimes your plans don't work. That's Hearthstone.
-
6
Biomass posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card DiscussionI completely agree, she’s really bad mannered. You should never look at someone’s hand nor what’s in his or her plate at dinner. Also don’t pick your nose in public. Just rude.
-
13
YoHabloEspanol posted a message on Madame LazulPosted in: Card DiscussionLul the priest hate movement is really getting stupid now. Whats next, hero power is op?
-
15
Tetsumoto posted a message on Petition to blizzard - Change (buff/unnerf) Tinkmaster Overspark in Hearthstone to cost 5-6 and effect targets.Posted in: General DiscussionNo
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
Worse than what? Holy Mackerel was the worst (that's the word you are looking for).
1
AAEBAQcG/ASFF5L4Ap74AqCAA7i5AwxLogT4B/8HqRWCrQLTxQLK5wKO+wKe+wKz/ALyqAMA
You should not have any problems with this list. Taunt Odd Warrior in general is just bad.
24
Annoying posts stop when.
People know what im talking about...
2
That's what Odd Warrior is for. ;)
Reno Decks (Priest is just a fantastic one, like Warlock) are by no means boring or play the same every game. I would advise to craft them.
1
And why exactly do you have to tell us this?
3
What's the point of writing a post about it?
1
So why do you care?
5
It is on even more games. I even have old record with 70% winrate over more than 70 games. Depends on the deck and how much you played it.
3
No there is not. How else can a lot of people constantly maintain winrates over 60 or even 70%?
37
Please log out.