It just doesn't make much sense to me. What's the tactic they use? If I try to rush upgrades, I always have to compromise my board and stay with like 5 minions at most, but some people reach rank 5 in like 5-6 battles and still manage to have like 2-3 golden minions and almost a perfect setup.
It can happen from time to time. Not every single fight. Just keep on playing and you will have a lucky run yourself as well where you rush to 5-6 and keep a strong board.
i am legend 6700 ish, in wild, and facing bronze 5 players...
You face bronze 5 players while you are legend? :O Seems like a strange match-making-system. I´m approx. 15k standard-legend and i hit other legend-player in similar ranges only.
The matchups are ONLY based on mmr not on the actual rank.
I'm so tired of everybody whining about something, that doesn't even happened . Will a Battle Pass come to HS? Sure! Does anybody know exactly how it will look like? Absolutely not! So why the fuck is everybody bitching around?
Because by bitching all together we can somewhat manipulate the outcome in our favor and for the good of all Hearthstone players. The community accomplished such a thing several times in the past, this case shouldn't be the exception. Does that answer you question?
I get that, i also get, that you can change if some things going really bad. But in this case, you don't know anything. Only a picture from a survey. Perhaps the participants of that survey told Blizzard, that this shit is totally unacceptable. Perhaps Blizzard is listening to them and perhaps they make another, better System, which is even better than the old System. Perhaps they'll anounce it and all the bitching and whining was completely unnecessary and useless.
I just like dealing with facts and fact is, that we don't know anything for sure.
I'm completely with you. But i hope we, as players, will get the best possible outcome. Because, blizzard knows this, we could very easily boycott changes and not spend anything.
I don't know, dude, could be too late. Not everyone is on the community side, many are only loyal to Blizzard.
Could be. But if the system is not rewarding/fun or worth the money people will start to riot very quick.
I'm so tired of everybody whining about something, that doesn't even happened . Will a Battle Pass come to HS? Sure! Does anybody know exactly how it will look like? Absolutely not! So why the fuck is everybody bitching around?
Because by bitching all together we can somewhat manipulate the outcome in our favor and for the good of all Hearthstone players. The community accomplished such a thing several times in the past, this case shouldn't be the exception. Does that answer you question?
I get that, i also get, that you can change if some things going really bad. But in this case, you don't know anything. Only a picture from a survey. Perhaps the participants of that survey told Blizzard, that this shit is totally unacceptable. Perhaps Blizzard is listening to them and perhaps they make another, better System, which is even better than the old System. Perhaps they'll anounce it and all the bitching and whining was completely unnecessary and useless.
I just like dealing with facts and fact is, that we don't know anything for sure.
I'm completely with you. But i hope we, as players, will get the best possible outcome. Because, blizzard knows this, we could very easily boycott changes and not spend anything.
But I agree with you that there was no real need to nerf Mindrender Illucia. It's nowhere near as powerful as people were claiming when the card was revealed. It's going to end up being almost unplayable versus control, and will only be sporadically useful against aggro. I fear it's going to end up just being a niche counter to combo decks. Too bad: very cool idea for a card.
Some people just like to see the world burning. Nerfing that many non-problematic cards would cause an even more one-sided meta.
You really think people like the game to be imbalanced and only play with a few decks that are able to compete? That's insane. We all try to do that if it's possible and some get bored sooner than others. But Blizzard would lose all their customers if they never care to balance the game at all. Try to convince me this is not the case.
I won't explain you anything. Why? Because you went full hyperbole, dude. You can believe what you want, I'm not going to try to change your mind.
But what is the point of your thread then?
Read the opening post again and pay more attention this time. Sorry, but I'm a bit busy right now. If you knew my favorite hobbie, you would understand.
I did, and yet I don't know. So that is the reason I ask. I can wait for an answer, so take your time.
If you don't understand it, seriously, it is not my problem. Honesty, I'm not going to waste my time and energy trying to explain everything again to just one person (or a handful more). I'm really sorry, but I'm not here for things like that.
By the way, nice signature, but what is unexpected these days? :P
So you do not want any discussion in the thread you started? Seems strange.
Let me explain what i mean in a longer statement. Here isn't just one group of people doing one or another. It's more like a cycle:
testing new stuff when expansion hits → realize it's broken → some stop playing it/some don't → people get bored by seeing it → nerfs happen → people enjoy the game again → new expansion hits
But if nerfs NEVER occur, there won't be any players left after a while. It may take some time, but it will happen eventually:
testing new stuff when expansion hits → realize it's broken → some stop playing it/some don't → people get bored by seeing it → the first people leaving the game → the same decks reign the meta → more people leave the game → new expansion hits (maybe players come back, but most likely they won't, because the oppressing decks are still there)
You see the difference? Nerfs are mandatory to keep the game healthy. If there is a mistake in this explanation please let me know.
0
It can happen from time to time. Not every single fight. Just keep on playing and you will have a lucky run yourself as well where you rush to 5-6 and keep a strong board.
0
The matchups are ONLY based on mmr not on the actual rank.
0
Thanks for your feedback. I tested it and Loatheb helps a lot. Any further suggestions?
0
Maybe you hit some unlucky matchups. Maybe you misplay. We cannot say for sure if you won't let you help.
2
I'd love to see more of this.
1
Could be. But if the system is not rewarding/fun or worth the money people will start to riot very quick.
0
I'm completely with you. But i hope we, as players, will get the best possible outcome. Because, blizzard knows this, we could very easily boycott changes and not spend anything.
0
I'd like to hear opinions and suggestions on how to improve my Jungle Giants list. Is there an expert on how to get this into Tier 3 areas? ^^
https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1362440-jungle-giants-druid
0
Some people just like to see the world burning. Nerfing that many non-problematic cards would cause an even more one-sided meta.
2
Kinda ineffective for the mana, but still good. Good luck for your climb to legend.
7
Really? You think Cult Neophyte needs to be nerfed? Loatheb was no problem, so this is only to counter natural counterplays by your opponent.
0
So you do not want any discussion in the thread you started? Seems strange.
Let me explain what i mean in a longer statement. Here isn't just one group of people doing one or another. It's more like a cycle:
testing new stuff when expansion hits → realize it's broken → some stop playing it/some don't → people get bored by seeing it → nerfs happen → people enjoy the game again → new expansion hits
But if nerfs NEVER occur, there won't be any players left after a while. It may take some time, but it will happen eventually:
testing new stuff when expansion hits → realize it's broken → some stop playing it/some don't → people get bored by seeing it → the first people leaving the game → the same decks reign the meta → more people leave the game → new expansion hits (maybe players come back, but most likely they won't, because the oppressing decks are still there)
You see the difference? Nerfs are mandatory to keep the game healthy. If there is a mistake in this explanation please let me know.
0
I think he means loser, but misspelled it.
0
I'd answer with: random
0
Have you not seen the 80+ damage Combo with Malygos then. Happens to be early as turn 7.