• 0

    posted a message on Admiral Proudmoore is unbalanced

    Those 3x 5/6s can be a problem :D I did manage to clear them with firs try(like 3 times) but  one more and i could have probably lost that one... Unbalanced tho? I think its an overstatement!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on George "BoarControl" Webb joining the Hearthstone Final Design Team

     Does anyone know what does Associate Game Designer do? Is he going to just test stuff that is created and give feedback or what?

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>

    Its sounds like OP thinks hes going to have better results once the strong heroes are nerfed...

     I don’t think I even mentioned my results

     Well maybe you should then. Then we would at least know if you are bad or not. 90% of these posts are made by frustrated people who cant get better rating and blame balance for that.

     I hovered around 8.5k before the update and I’m at 5k this update

     So is that it? This update is "absolutely ridiculous" (your words) because you cant get over 5k and blame Rag and Jandice for it? Why is that so many other players can get higher ratings even with these evil OP heroes out there?  Top 200 starts at around 10k... how are those people able to get that rating.... mystery... they must be getting only Rag and Jandice offered... luck it must be...

    Anyway, like i said, yet another frustrated person creating a thread because he cant get a better rating. (its fine tho, its what forums are for).

    Good use of a straw man argument.

    My argument has never been based off mine or others wins or losses or getting a certain placement. It’s based off balance issues that are reflected from hero win ratios and how devs are pushing for new content first INSTEAD of fixing the current problems that the majority of players agree are an issue.

    I can see how it’s easier to argue against no one instead of actually talking about what’s been disccused, gj

     

     There is no straw man argument here. I am talking about completely different thing here, which is why people make these useless posts and 90% of the time its because they are frustrated with their results as it seems to be in your case with 5k rating.

    Maybe that’s why they post, you’re probably right. But you even said it yourself, you’re talking about something completely different lol hence, strawman. Look up the definition if you need to.

    Luckily though we have a general player consensus and stats to back my argument that the game needs balancing. So even if you make a nonapplicable statement that frustrated people post bc they can’t climb, that doesn’t make my argument any less true.

     

     I am talking about something else and i am not even talking about YOUR argument.  Thus strawman argument doesn't apply. You should really look the definition up yourself, seems like you don't even understand the concept.

    "A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person's argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."

    As to your argument "game needs balancing" all i am going to say is that its a very subjective thing. Its what you want out of the game (and seems like many other posters), i personally couldn't care less if one tribe is much stronger than other or one hero is stronger than other. I will play the game either way if i want to because the state of heroes and minions does not affect me being able to win and climb.

     

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST
    Quote from tripzplash >>

    the speed is not to fast i want 25 min games since i wanna play when eating my breakfeast  just befor work so when game some times take 40 min its really to long game

     I can only agree. I don't know why anyone would want 40 minutes games, feels way too slow to grind.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 2

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>

    Its sounds like OP thinks hes going to have better results once the strong heroes are nerfed...

     I don’t think I even mentioned my results

     Well maybe you should then. Then we would at least know if you are bad or not. 90% of these posts are made by frustrated people who cant get better rating and blame balance for that.

     I hovered around 8.5k before the update and I’m at 5k this update

     So is that it? This update is "absolutely ridiculous" (your words) because you cant get over 5k and blame Rag and Jandice for it? Why is that so many other players can get higher ratings even with these evil OP heroes out there?  Top 200 starts at around 10k... how are those people able to get that rating.... mystery... they must be getting only Rag and Jandice offered... luck it must be...

    Anyway, like i said, yet another frustrated person creating a thread because he cant get a better rating. (its fine tho, its what forums are for).

    Good use of a straw man argument.

    My argument has never been based off mine or others wins or losses or getting a certain placement. It’s based off balance issues that are reflected from hero win ratios and how devs are pushing for new content first INSTEAD of fixing the current problems that the majority of players agree are an issue.

    I can see how it’s easier to argue against no one instead of actually talking about what’s been disccused, gj

     

     There is no straw man argument here. I am talking about completely different thing here, which is why people make these useless posts and 90% of the time its because they are frustrated with their results as it seems to be in your case with 5k rating.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 2

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>

    Its sounds like OP thinks hes going to have better results once the strong heroes are nerfed...

     I don’t think I even mentioned my results

     Well maybe you should then. Then we would at least know if you are bad or not. 90% of these posts are made by frustrated people who cant get better rating and blame balance for that.

     I hovered around 8.5k before the update and I’m at 5k this update

     So is that it? This update is "absolutely ridiculous" (your words) because you cant get over 5k and blame Rag and Jandice for it? Why is that so many other players can get higher ratings even with these evil OP heroes out there?  Top 200 starts at around 10k... how are those people able to get that rating.... mystery... they must be getting only Rag and Jandice offered... luck it must be...

    Anyway, like i said, yet another frustrated person creating a thread because he cant get a better rating. (its fine tho, its what forums are for).

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST
    Quote from Ido_ >>
    Quote from AOFHE >>

    Its sounds like OP thinks hes going to have better results once the strong heroes are nerfed...

     I don’t think I even mentioned my results

     Well maybe you should then. Then we would at least know if you are bad or not. 90% of these posts are made by frustrated people who cant get better rating and blame balance for that.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 1

    posted a message on BG is going down FAST

    Its sounds like OP thinks hes going to have better results once the strong heroes are nerfed...

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 16

    posted a message on Dean "Iksar" Ayala Talks About Battlegrounds, Ranked Resets, Party MMR & More

    For me, this change ruins solo experience and makes me want to play BGs less. Now every game there are chance i am playing with group of players who might or might not at some level create an unfair game. Boosting potential is very big in this setup. 

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on These nerfs are not enough
    Quote from Devilseye >>
    Quote from Nickfuryusn >>

    How many paladins did you see at gms this weekend? 

     

     Most GM's dont bring Paladin cause they know its broken and other will have prepare for it and bring counters. 

     Even if what you say is true (paladin being broken), its not broken enough that it needs nerfs if there are many counters.

    Btw Gms dont bring paladin because its an inferior deck to decks they bring. 

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Libram Paladin is in desperate need of nerfs
    Quote from Fog_za >>
    Quote from Jdeg >>

    Hey guys just thought I’d drop my two cents. Right now I’m top 800 legend and it’s rare for me to see paladin in general. I’ve tried the deck and to me what it seems is that the deck can 

    1. draw well and do decently or

    2. draw poorly and have no chance at winning games.

    The deck is just too inconsistent and though it has a good matchup against druids, it drops in popularity the higher you go through legend. Data seems to be very skewed recently (don’t ask me why) but the stats on libram paladin’s winrate remind me of murloc paladin last expansion which, although it showed a high winrate, was a tier three deck at best. And although tournament/gm showings have different rulesets I think it’s still good to look at the evidence that paladin has been rarely/not at all been taken up as a deck of choice.

     Lots of decks can "draw badly and have no chance at winning" lol. I love the way people keep insisting "it's a tier 3 deck actually" even though the stats say otherwise. Yesterday I check high legend stats on NA and it was the best deck at 53% - it probably won't be today. I think high legend is a volatile meta and it changes ALL the time with such a small player pool. At one point tortollan mage looked viable. Would you play that at a lower rank because it eats libram paladin for breakfast? No because it has a 38% winrate at lower ranks. Btw, it doesn't just match up well against druid. That's just something people keep saying that isn't true, according to the stats.

     So whats your take on why GMs are not taking advantage of this powerhouse of a deck that libram paladin is? Why they are not bringing this deck to crush all other decks? I mean why take bomb warrior , tempo mage, highlander priest, guardian druid, malygos druid and endless variations of rogue when they can take the OP libram paladin and crush these decks.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Libram Paladin is in desperate need of nerfs

    I personally like pure paladin deck, its fun to play it and its also nice that its so strong that its ALMOST viable in legend ranks.

    Also the fact that this deck is not popular in GMs should tell you something. It just cant deal with any top tier decks despite what all stats sites tell.

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.