Hearthpwn

So should I craft the rogue, mage, priest or lock legendary? I would I be better served making a King Mukla or Green Skin? Being the best neutrals I don't already own.

I am about 500 dust short of my next legendary. Either, Harrison Jones or Edwin VanCleef. Should I just de him or wait to see what I get in future packs, which will come much later down the line as I am saving gold for Naxx.

If you have all the cards you want have at it. I don't see any new craftable cards coming out any time soon so nothing else to use the dust on.

Seriouse post time lolz!

These threads always hurt my head when they pop up. It happens in every f2p games forums where someone who is unwilling to spend money on game that they get enjoyment out of and expects the same experiance as those who does. Two things to consider when looking at Hearthstone.

First, Hearthstone is a F2P game that means it keeps itself in busness by forcing you to chose between your patience and your wallet. Ie would I rather spend $10 on nine packs or wait ten days.

Second, Hearthstone is a TCG. THEY ARE ALL PAY TO WIN. In reality where you have to buy the cards or digitly were you have to buy the cards like Hearthstone, Duel of Champions ect.

If you can not handle these two things then do not play the game.

Quote from Christonya »

Quote from heyitsmiro »

Playing to cap and doing quests gets you over 4000 gold a month.  That's a load of free packs every month.  You can't not have cards if you actually try, and if you aren't trying then what exactly do you want?  What's wrong with spending money on this game anyways?  The people buying cards are keeping the game going, not the f2p crowd.  Why treat supporting a game as some kind of dirty act?  Buying cards isn't paying to win, it's just how games work.  

Zoo and Hunter were already given as examples of viable free-to-play decks, and the response was a cry for help about being pigeon holed.  I don't understand how you can refuse to spend money or time on a game and demand to be on even footing with everyone else.  

This game being free to play gives people the most peculiar sense of entitlement.  

Imagine if golden heros / golden cards were bought via IRL cash.... And all other cards were not instead however you generated alot of them by grinding (Say a pack every 3 wins) The game would self sustain easily by those who want all the shiny stuff that gives them no advantage in the actual player vs player gameplay, suddenly, you cant just pay to win, instead you pay for a certainly level of flare / cosmetic bonuses, keeping the game alive and from a competitive point of view, every one is equal.

It's not a sense of entitlement its using a proper monetization plan.

I have never seen an online TCG that was able to sustain itself without selling card packs. A golden card is not a skin like it is in LoL were your average person would be will to spend X-amount. 

The only thing I dislike about Zoo deck is when they get that perfect opening hand. That hand that coupled with the next few turns that end up making it, so their opponit can't play the game.

So mine is thuse.

I'm playing the new mid range hunter that is all the rage now, having some fun. Come up against a priest the game is long and rather back and forth. I have the win next turn but he has a 6/5 that I can't deal with it. I decided to flood the board. He proceeds to play not only two Unleash the Hounds , but two Kill Commandending the game. 

Leeroy is only worth the dust if you play certain aggro decks and handlock for the Leeroy=shadowflame combo

I know Mukla is big for the mid range hunter atm but I'm not sure how long that will last.

Should I work on finishing crafting my class cards? All I need is the warlock, priest and rogue legendaries and two Preperation, none of which I play all that much. Or would I be better off making more situational legendaries like King Mukla and Harrison Jones?

I already have the must have neutral legendaries :)