• 14

    posted a message on If you still think this game is random you are insane

    Still not sure why I bother playing this game.

    Over the years I have become convinced that this game is not random in any way. From your matchup, to your card draws, to your pack openings, to the RNG within your games, all of them are weighted by blizzard towards achieving their goals of a 50 percent win rate and to inspire/reward spending.

    In todays episode I decided to ladder a bit with Keleseth Rogue. I win two games then match up 3 straight games with exodia mage (ok that could be random). Each game it starts me with swashburgler (ok, we know it likes to give you a one cost in your opening hand and that is a fine enough opening) but the capper is hilarious. In all 3 games, it generates a frost nova........Now can a math guy run the odds on that? lol, how about the odds that the algorithim has decided that giving keleseth rogue a frost nova against exodia mage keeps the game interesting interesting.....far more likely.

    Anyone who plays this game for a fair bit of time knows exactly what I am talking about. How many times you mulligan away your hand and get the exact same cards back? How many times after a win streak do you get the same losing matchup, even the same card order game after game? Anyone with 3 or more gold heroes actually think this game is random at all?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is Hearthstone Pay to Win?
    Quote from BeaWolf >>

    All collecting card games are pay to win, HS included. You Think you would have had any chance in Magic The Gathering with only your friends hans over (free cards) . Well you wouldnt. To play on a competive level you had to buy alot of cards or trade smart. As you cant Trade in HS your other option is to buy. Ofc you can get really good cards for free in HA bit that reauires alot of time. So basicly it comes Down to having alot of money or alot of time to play HS on any competive level. Some have neither, and those of us with family and work only have money to spare.

    HS is a P2W game, but that is not a bad thing, most games are.

    True P2W games wouldn't give the option of spending a lot of time to collect gold/dust/cards to ever reach a competitive level, it would only be possible by spending real money. That is true P2W, access ONLY through money. Allowing or encouraging players to spend money to get competitive cards/decks faster through spending money is not P2W.
     so silly, all p2w games need to have a large user base of 'have nots' for the spenders to feel superior. Games that make f2p completely unplayable quickly fail. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Is Hearthstone Pay to Win?
    Quote from BeaWolf >>

    All collecting card games are pay to win, HS included. You Think you would have had any chance in Magic The Gathering with only your friends hans over (free cards) . Well you wouldnt. To play on a competive level you had to buy alot of cards or trade smart. As you cant Trade in HS your other option is to buy. Ofc you can get really good cards for free in HA bit that reauires alot of time. So basicly it comes Down to having alot of money or alot of time to play HS on any competive level. Some have neither, and those of us with family and work only have money to spare.

    HS is a P2W game, but that is not a bad thing, most games are.

     Actually, the P2W thing is relatively new. I have been playing computer games for 30 or so years. Only in the last 5 years has p2w taken over.
    It used to be that you would pay a reasonable fee up front, and get a competively balanced game. No one could garner an advantage by paying more money. But then the corporations learned that the integrity of a game is unimportant. it is the experience of the average user (that is why they rigg matchups, draws, winrates etc) and catering to the big spenders (that is why there is an option in many competitive games to spend thousands of dollars for a competitive advantage). Where gaming was once a contest of skill, it is now becoming a simulation of a contest that is engineered to reward spenders. Which is good for bad players willing to spend money, and good for corporations, it is just bad for those of us who remember when being good at a game mattered. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on dragon priest seems almost unbeatable.. any counters?

    Secret mage pretty much poops on dragon priest, too much tempo, too much burn. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is Hearthstone Pay to Win?
    Quote from Velrun >>
    Quote from FakeNorwegian >>

    Just quoting a guy i found on the bnet forum.

     

    I personally use this definition: "If a game has a PvP element of any sort, and if you can use real money to buy any kind of advantage, then the game is P2W".

    DOTA2 for example is not P2W, as nothing you buy has any actual impact on the gameplay. 

    HS is P2W, because people who pay money can get good cards more easily and thus have an advantage. For example, I have the priest DK but no Raza, I have the evo Shaman but no Doppelgangster, I have no other DKs nor a LK. All those are disadvantages, that result in worse decks. If I would pay money, I could acquire all these cards one way or another instantly right now, improve my decks and thus my chances of winning.

     

    So for me i think its p2w. Just met a guy in rank 19 with 7 legendaries completly destroyed my jade golem that took me 2 weeks to make with dust and opening packs.

     You misunderstood what he said.
    You cannot pay to gain any kind of advantage in Hearthstone that you cannot also get by grinding. If you want all the cards, play more.
    It has been proven time and time again that HS is not P2W. A really strong player can take a brand new account and only play without paying anything and take it to Legend in 2 months.
     This is just wrong, especially if you aspire to play in tournamants, you cannot keep up by grinding, you have to pay. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 95% Mages?

    if you play eater of secrets the algorithim simply wont match you against secrets, you will more likely get a mirror match and both eaters in your opening hand. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 95% Mages?

    the meta is not a meta, the algorithim matches you based on whether it wants you to win or lose. if you winning 50 percent you will see the same decks over and over. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 95% Mages?
    Quote from BrannBronzeBeard >>

    Okey, sounds lucky, IF u know that 95% is the same decks just tech against them, Easy wins

     If you tech against a specific deck, the algorithim wont match you with it. Last season I got sick of Razakus priest, so I put in two mindbreakers in various decks, in 100's of games with that minion....no razakus....wonder how that happens, oh yeah, the matchmaking and RNG in this game are rigged.....
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on 95% Mages?

    Everyone has a different experience. The game matches you up with counter decks to keep you buying new packs. 

    The algorithim may think it will get you to buy packs to get certain cards you don't have.

    Activision is so happy with their result that they patented the process

    http://www.rollingstone.com/glixel/news/how-activision-uses-matchmaking-tricks-to-sell-in-game-items-w509288

    The funny thing is try playing 10 games with a deck, after a while you will see the same counters over and over. Then you will move to counter what you are seeing, and the game will give you completely different counters. It is becoming nearly unplayable, because between the matchmaking, the card draw and the 'weighted' rng mechanics, it feels like the game is playing itself. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on No new daily quests since K&C launch

    quests broken on release of new content. Maybe some people will buy more? Great job Blizz.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Going free to play for this set. anyone else?

    I went free to play when blizzard got rid of the adventures to make hearthstone more expensive. Before the change you could spend 40 a year on hearthstone and basically make any deck you wanted. Now you can spend 150 bucks a year and still come up short. No thanks. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Neutral Minion - Fungal Enchanter

    hidden gem of this expansion, in any type of zoo or board flood deck. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Neutral Minion - Stoneskin Basilisk

    bad cuz priest will be everywhere running this into your biggest minion on the board, killing it or stealing it altogether. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Neutral Minion - Hungry Ettin

    I would not play this card when ahead with Blizzards 'weighted' RNG.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Druid Legendary - Ixlid, Fungal Lord

    just drop it in the naga giant deck in wild. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.