respect zeddy for speaking his mind, taking sides with the players , not content creators who get cash from blizz to be "positive" about changes
No, he just gets money by manipulating the gullible into believing he "sides with the players." It's one of the oldest tricks in the book: redirect/ build on/ exacerbate individual grievances as a way of a) getting rich; b) gaining political power; or c) both.
The fact that you're falling for it shows how well it's working. Some people will believe anything, as long as they're told "I'm fighting for you against the powerful." You won't believe a company, but you'll believe some random dude on the internet who you don't know from a hole in the wall. Great critical thinking there.
1
Funnier the first time you did it last week.
1
I don't know why this is so hard for some people.
They gave her Oakheart stats, but she costs 1 mana less.
The only issue with Willow is card pool.
Once the cardpool is Willow friendly, she will also be as good as Oakheart was.
25
The absolute epitome of a person who just wants to complain for the sake of complaining.
2
This has been the class identity for yeeeears.
1
Galakrond Warlock is one of the best decks in the format...but let's ignore that.
3
lol it's been like 2 days
edit: also this post was ben-on-ben violence.
1
this
1
Salt thread, salt thread
----
Played about 5 games last night - mostly felt similar to lobbies in the last meta where murlocs weren't available. Beasts are better I suppose. Although I didn't play enough to have a good idea exactly how much better they were.
Lich King went from being a mid/late game Hero to an all around good hero, which is interesting. He feels kind of like a KT or Yogg type hero.
12
To me, It's the best meta we've had in a while.
But if Trump-bumping Chillwind Yetis is your ideal hearthstone, this meta isn't for you.
1
^^ Yeah. Can confirm.
This happened to me last week. Voidwalker was missing from my collection. But restarting the client fixed it.