You're filling your opponent's hand, so he have to play this, but he can't if you have some antimage cards on your board. Also Mukla's health if 5, which means he will survive flamestrike if you have an antimage tower.
I should test this card because it may be nice improvement to antimage deck.
For me this deck is an autowin against mage, rogue, warlock. On the other side, it's an autolose against paladin and hunter. That's because of the main weakness: this deck is afraid of powerful creatures.
2
I would play 10 copies but because of some dumb restrictions only Mukla + Hog Rancher / Ghoul is possible
2
Flesheating Ghoul should be fine replacement too
5
King Mukla may be even better than a hog rancher.
You're filling your opponent's hand, so he have to play this, but he can't if you have some antimage cards on your board. Also Mukla's health if 5, which means he will survive flamestrike if you have an antimage tower.
I should test this card because it may be nice improvement to antimage deck.
0
Atm i have 4 wins 0 loses against Warlock, so idk what to say. Ofc this game is about random but i can't call warlock is unwinnable. Paladin is.
0
O_o
0
For me this deck is an autowin against mage, rogue, warlock. On the other side, it's an autolose against paladin and hunter. That's because of the main weakness: this deck is afraid of powerful creatures.
But the real mage hunter never give up.