I did the Frozen Throne prologue and got Scourgelord Garrosh. Since it's a new account I guess any class is welcome for a legendary but I'm kinda dissapointed it had to be him.
Wait, is there a question connected to this thread? Or is it just a thread to say you've gotten DK Garrosh and are slightly disappointed?
I think he's one of the weaker DK's, definitely, but he has some good synergy with Gromm, and he works well in a Recruit Warrior deck, which is tier 3 at best.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
Oh yeah I just came here to release my.. dissapointment, I guess. Don't get me wrong any legendary except very few ones are welcome on a new account, but it IS the weakest DK like you mentioned.
He's definitely seen less play these days than he used to (he was considered quite strong for a little while). Dead Man's fatigue deck or (as mentioned above) Recruit Warrior are good decks for him to slot into (though obviously neither are tier 1 right now). Free legendaries are free legendaries, though eh? ;-)
He's definitely seen less play these days than he used to (he was considered quite strong for a little while). Dead Man's fatigue deck or (as mentioned above) Recruit Warrior are good decks for him to slot into (though obviously neither are tier 1 right now). Free legendaries are free legendaries, though eh? ;-)
Indeed, yay for free stuff :D at least that's what I'll keep telling myself when I see him staring at me in the collection
Oh yeah I just came here to release my.. dissapointment, I guess. Don't get me wrong any legendary except very few ones are welcome on a new account, but it IS the weakest DK like you mentioned.
Ah, okay. I get the disappointment in this case. Out of the 9 you could've gotten, he's definitely the weaker one. If you don't plan on playing Wild (I have one F2P account for Standard only that I only recently created), he's 400 dust, in the least.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
ThijsNL got #3 of EU with regular Taunt Warrior + DK Garrosh, while NeiraaHS got #7 of USA.
Besides that, Rush Warrior is only 1% winrate behind Odd Taunt Warrior. Where Scourgelord plays kinda as center piece.
Worst is definitely Valeera and Thrall, very niche, can't put them in all their decks.
You're talking like Odd Warrior was a good deck for the current meta lol.
Also the fact that 2 really good pro players that play this game all that included this card on their deck doesn't mean it's good either, they're superior that most other players and I can guarantee you that if they didn't play this card their winrate with the said decks would be close to the same, it could even be better with another card, who knows.
ThijsNL got #3 of EU with regular Taunt Warrior + DK Garrosh, while NeiraaHS got #7 of USA.
Besides that, Rush Warrior is only 1% winrate behind Odd Taunt Warrior. Where Scourgelord plays kinda as center piece.
Worst is definitely Valeera and Thrall, very niche, can't put them in all their decks.
You're talking like Odd Warrior was a good deck for the current meta lol.
Also the fact that 2 really good pro players that play this game all that included this card on their deck doesn't mean it's good either, they're superior that most other players and I can guarantee you that if they didn't play this card their winrate with the said decks would be close to the same, it could even be better with another card, who knows.
Huh? Odd Warrior (and even more so, Odd Qu Warrior) are two of the best win rate decks in the current meta, dude. It's an ideal deck - assuming you're looking to win matches, of course.
ThijsNL got #3 of EU with regular Taunt Warrior + DK Garrosh, while NeiraaHS got #7 of USA.
Besides that, Rush Warrior is only 1% winrate behind Odd Taunt Warrior. Where Scourgelord plays kinda as center piece.
Worst is definitely Valeera and Thrall, very niche, can't put them in all their decks.
You're talking like Odd Warrior was a good deck for the current meta lol.
Also the fact that 2 really good pro players that play this game all that included this card on their deck doesn't mean it's good either, they're superior that most other players and I can guarantee you that if they didn't play this card their winrate with the said decks would be close to the same, it could even be better with another card, who knows.
Odd Warrior is definitely a good deck, it had for a while most highest winrate during Rastakhan. After lots of Mech'thun decks, its winrate dropped but still good enough to be called a good deck.
There is no replacement for Scourgelord Garrosh in Rush deck, nor in the high-legend Regular Taunt deck. If there is, show it... which pro-player got regular Taunt Deck to absolute peak of the ranking without Scourgelord Garrosh?
The fact that Fibonacci uses Scourgelord Garrosh in all his Control/Fatigue/Recruit Decks, the fact that the DK has been used in literally every Warrior archtype, from Control, Fatigue, Taunt, Tempo/Rush, Recruit... shows that the DK is just plainly good.
As long as Odd-paladin and Token/Aggro decks are strong, Garrosh stays relevant.
You could get Shaman or Priest DK which are not really good ones either.
Good joke. Whils shaman ia meh Priest DK is op af. Granted after year of the mamoth it declined in power the raza priest qas crazy and the card is still key for reno priest. The aoe with cheap dmg for late game makes it op. In fact control priest a t1 deck relies on it to kill off opponent after reducing their health to 15 and combo the hero power with 2 mind blasts foe lethal
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I did the Frozen Throne prologue and got Scourgelord Garrosh. Since it's a new account I guess any class is welcome for a legendary but I'm kinda dissapointed it had to be him.
Wait, is there a question connected to this thread? Or is it just a thread to say you've gotten DK Garrosh and are slightly disappointed?
I think he's one of the weaker DK's, definitely, but he has some good synergy with Gromm, and he works well in a Recruit Warrior deck, which is tier 3 at best.
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
Oh yeah I just came here to release my.. dissapointment, I guess. Don't get me wrong any legendary except very few ones are welcome on a new account, but it IS the weakest DK like you mentioned.
He's definitely seen less play these days than he used to (he was considered quite strong for a little while).
Dead Man's fatigue deck or (as mentioned above) Recruit Warrior are good decks for him to slot into (though obviously neither are tier 1 right now).
Free legendaries are free legendaries, though eh? ;-)
Indeed, yay for free stuff :D at least that's what I'll keep telling myself when I see him staring at me in the collection
No need to create threads to vent your disappointment. Use thesalt thread instead.
Ah, okay. I get the disappointment in this case. Out of the 9 you could've gotten, he's definitely the weaker one. If you don't plan on playing Wild (I have one F2P account for Standard only that I only recently created), he's 400 dust, in the least.
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
I'm 99% sure I'm not the first and the last one to vent his dissapointment about something related to the game, but thanks mr.policeman :)
DK Garrosh is actually very good..
ThijsNL got #3 of EU with regular Taunt Warrior + DK Garrosh, while NeiraaHS got #7 of USA.
Besides that, Rush Warrior is only 1% winrate behind Odd Taunt Warrior. Where Scourgelord plays kinda as center piece.
Worst is definitely Valeera and Thrall, very niche, can't put them in all their decks.
You're talking like Odd Warrior was a good deck for the current meta lol.
Also the fact that 2 really good pro players that play this game all that included this card on their deck doesn't mean it's good either, they're superior that most other players and I can guarantee you that if they didn't play this card their winrate with the said decks would be close to the same, it could even be better with another card, who knows.
Huh?
Odd Warrior (and even more so, Odd Qu Warrior) are two of the best win rate decks in the current meta, dude.
It's an ideal deck - assuming you're looking to win matches, of course.
You could get Shaman or Priest DK which are not really good ones either.
--Alfi--
Odd Warrior is definitely a good deck, it had for a while most highest winrate during Rastakhan. After lots of Mech'thun decks, its winrate dropped but still good enough to be called a good deck.
There is no replacement for Scourgelord Garrosh in Rush deck, nor in the high-legend Regular Taunt deck. If there is, show it... which pro-player got regular Taunt Deck to absolute peak of the ranking without Scourgelord Garrosh?
The fact that Fibonacci uses Scourgelord Garrosh in all his Control/Fatigue/Recruit Decks, the fact that the DK has been used in literally every Warrior archtype, from Control, Fatigue, Taunt, Tempo/Rush, Recruit... shows that the DK is just plainly good.
As long as Odd-paladin and Token/Aggro decks are strong, Garrosh stays relevant.
Good joke. Whils shaman ia meh Priest DK is op af. Granted after year of the mamoth it declined in power the raza priest qas crazy and the card is still key for reno priest. The aoe with cheap dmg for late game makes it op. In fact control priest a t1 deck relies on it to kill off opponent after reducing their health to 15 and combo the hero power with 2 mind blasts foe lethal