Yes, it might be a QQ thread. But come on. Matchups are once again 80% the same. The community is simply build around the highest winrate netdeck now.
Once again the whole matchups from rank 20 to high legend is full of Warriors. Everyone playing the same deck. This is as unfun as it can be. And that is why we need to have a ban mode. The reasons are easy:
At first you avoid all the decks you don't like. Sounds stupid, is THE argument of the people against a ban mode. But the people don't think beyond that.
Let's imagine people ban warriors now. More people probably gonna play rogue then, right? What is happening now? People gonna ban more Rogues. And now the cycle gonna continue. The variation in the meta would be insane.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Yes, it might be a QQ thread. But come on. Matchups are once again 80% the same. The community is simply build around the highest winrate netdeck now.
Once again the whole matchups from rank 20 to high legend is full of Warriors. Everyone playing the same deck. This is as unfun as it can be.
And that is why we need to have a ban mode. The reasons are easy:
At first you avoid all the decks you don't like. Sounds stupid, is THE argument of the people against a ban mode. But the people don't think beyond that.
Let's imagine people ban warriors now. More people probably gonna play rogue then, right? What is happening now? People gonna ban more Rogues. And now the cycle gonna continue. The variation in the meta would be insane.