Wow it’s like you didn’t even read the gargantuan list of insane tech cards that were both narrow and wide that saw insane amounts of play, even warranting nerfs. You really don’t understand game mechanics either as dispite something being wide/narrow, it’s still a tech card and the reason they are played is due to its necessity to counter a specific mechanic that needs and should be interacted with. I could respond to every single card you responded to but it’s clear you don’t have any idea what you were talking as they were all a weak. They came down to the same thing. Either ‘it wasn't good outside the matchup’ (which often it was or didn’t really matter) or that it’s not a tech card bc it’s too wide of range. Even if it’s wide/narrow, THEYRE ALL DEFINED AS TECH CARDS, and all of them found insane levels of play. You know what is narrow is your argument. Just stop.
Also wtf is this post, it’s not only a terrible opinion piece but it’s completely nonsensical and formatted terribly. You either write the acronym or the phrase, not both, especially in the title. Also why tf did this turn to a reason blizzard is a terrible company?? Like they’re plenty of valid arguments, but them making tech cards without making a sideboard feature (which would not only complicate the UI but also the entirety of the game for little casual reason) due to them “hating fun”?? That’s by far the most empty argument without any real good format I’ve seen on here. You make r/hearthstone look better to post than here, just stop.
Yeah completely useless, that’s why they nerfed theotar 2 times and owl/smothering starfish and BGH once, things like ooze/rustrot viper, golakka crawler, albatross, mctech, skulking Geist, cult neophyte, dirty rat, Lotheb, and mutanus to name a few never ever seen any play. You’re right completely useless, much like this smooth brain post…
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Wow it’s like you didn’t even read the gargantuan list of insane tech cards that were both narrow and wide that saw insane amounts of play, even warranting nerfs. You really don’t understand game mechanics either as dispite something being wide/narrow, it’s still a tech card and the reason they are played is due to its necessity to counter a specific mechanic that needs and should be interacted with. I could respond to every single card you responded to but it’s clear you don’t have any idea what you were talking as they were all a weak. They came down to the same thing. Either ‘it wasn't good outside the matchup’ (which often it was or didn’t really matter) or that it’s not a tech card bc it’s too wide of range. Even if it’s wide/narrow, THEYRE ALL DEFINED AS TECH CARDS, and all of them found insane levels of play. You know what is narrow is your argument. Just stop.
Also wtf is this post, it’s not only a terrible opinion piece but it’s completely nonsensical and formatted terribly. You either write the acronym or the phrase, not both, especially in the title. Also why tf did this turn to a reason blizzard is a terrible company?? Like they’re plenty of valid arguments, but them making tech cards without making a sideboard feature (which would not only complicate the UI but also the entirety of the game for little casual reason) due to them “hating fun”?? That’s by far the most empty argument without any real good format I’ve seen on here. You make r/hearthstone look better to post than here, just stop.
Yeah completely useless, that’s why they nerfed theotar 2 times and owl/smothering starfish and BGH once, things like ooze/rustrot viper, golakka crawler, albatross, mctech, skulking Geist, cult neophyte, dirty rat, Lotheb, and mutanus to name a few never ever seen any play. You’re right completely useless, much like this smooth brain post…