I believe that the main problem with Tickatus is exactly how annoying and uninteractive it is to lose to gala/control warlock playing control deck, and the worse part is actually that both of this warlock decks just don’t have any wincondition other than tickatus, so if you play any value oriented control deck you simply lose to tickatus without any chance of winning, yes, I know, there should be a counter for a greedy control decks, but I think cards like archbishop benedictus, are by far more, design wise, better than tickatus.
Back to the topic, Y’shaarj require both tempo loss and deck-building restriction, don’t forget that you also need cards in you deck that trigger the corrupt effect, it was probably said by somebody above, but I was a bit to lazy to read, sorry :p
I believe that the main problem with Tickatus is exactly how annoying and uninteractive it is to lose to gala/control warlock playing control deck, and the worse part is actually that both of this warlock decks just don’t have any wincondition other than tickatus, so if you play any value oriented control deck you simply lose to tickatus without any chance of winning, yes, I know, there should be a counter for a greedy control decks, but I think cards like archbishop benedictus, are by far more, design wise, better than tickatus.
Back to the topic, Y’shaarj require both tempo loss and deck-building restriction, don’t forget that you also need cards in you deck that trigger the corrupt effect, it was probably said by somebody above, but I was a bit to lazy to read, sorry :p