another reason they are manipulating RNG is libram pally.
they have 2×1 drops and 2×FDoS
these 4 cards are played close to zoo in first turn.
i actually have hard time playing a 1 drop as zoo in first turn.
librams are EZ,
or first days of evolve shaman they were obviously counter evolving.
RNG cards are almot highest WR cards in game becuz blizzard really thinks they are fun.
there are other proofs, dont have time
-Played another 4 games of Priest to keep up with your incredible data collection. 2 Demon Hunter, 1 Highlander Hunter, 1 Pure Paladin. I don't play Priest either. Once again, I played against classes that are part of the meta. At this rate between the two of us we'll have a useful dataset in a month or so.
-Assuming a Libram Paladin hard mulligans for Aldor Attendant and First Day of School, going first (ie having less cards in their opening hand) they'll have seen 7 cards by the time they're playing turn 1 (3 pre-mulligan, 3 post-mulligan, 1 draw at the start of turn 1). That means they have a (26/30)*(25/29)*(24/28)*...*(20/24) = 32% chance of NOT drawing any of their turn 1 cards by turn 1. So, them having a play on turn 1 two thirds of the time is expected. Yes, they're probably also holding cards other than their turn 1 plays sometimes (you hold Consecration vs Demon Hunter, and Hand of A'dal against slower decks), but the probability is still somewhere around 60% that they have Aldor or First Day. Once again, you conspiracy types are easily disproven by high-school level maths.
-I don't know what the hell "obviously counter evolving means.
-The only cards in the top 20 sorted by Deck Winrate on HSReplay at the moments that feature heavy RNG are Dragonbane, Demon Companion, and Imprisoned Felmaw. These all happen to be cards that are very powerful regardless of whether you get lucky on RNG or not. This is typically the sort of RNG that sees play in Hearthstone, cards where the average RNG on them is strong. If RNG was getting rigged to be positive most of the time Mad Bomber would be dominating the meta right now as a 2 mana 3/2 with a Darkbomb attached to it.
As an experiment, I played 5 games with Priest. 1 Priest, 2 Rogues, 1 Demon Hunter, 1 Paladin. RIGGED! I HAD GAMES! AGAINST CLASSES! IN HEARTHSTONE! RIGGED!
-Played another 4 games of Priest to keep up with your incredible data collection. 2 Demon Hunter, 1 Highlander Hunter, 1 Pure Paladin. I don't play Priest either. Once again, I played against classes that are part of the meta. At this rate between the two of us we'll have a useful dataset in a month or so.
-Assuming a Libram Paladin hard mulligans for Aldor Attendant and First Day of School, going first (ie having less cards in their opening hand) they'll have seen 7 cards by the time they're playing turn 1 (3 pre-mulligan, 3 post-mulligan, 1 draw at the start of turn 1). That means they have a (26/30)*(25/29)*(24/28)*...*(20/24) = 32% chance of NOT drawing any of their turn 1 cards by turn 1. So, them having a play on turn 1 two thirds of the time is expected. Yes, they're probably also holding cards other than their turn 1 plays sometimes (you hold Consecration vs Demon Hunter, and Hand of A'dal against slower decks), but the probability is still somewhere around 60% that they have Aldor or First Day. Once again, you conspiracy types are easily disproven by high-school level maths.
-I don't know what the hell "obviously counter evolving means.
-The only cards in the top 20 sorted by Deck Winrate on HSReplay at the moments that feature heavy RNG are Dragonbane, Demon Companion, and Imprisoned Felmaw. These all happen to be cards that are very powerful regardless of whether you get lucky on RNG or not. This is typically the sort of RNG that sees play in Hearthstone, cards where the average RNG on them is strong. If RNG was getting rigged to be positive most of the time Mad Bomber would be dominating the meta right now as a 2 mana 3/2 with a Darkbomb attached to it.
As an experiment, I played 5 games with Priest. 1 Priest, 2 Rogues, 1 Demon Hunter, 1 Paladin. RIGGED! I HAD GAMES! AGAINST CLASSES! IN HEARTHSTONE! RIGGED!
Bit of light reading for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
6 games is a pitiful sample size as anyone who's attended a high school maths class can tell you.