Aggro vs aggro is much more like who win the bingo of best starting hand than anything else.
Midrange vs midrange deserve a lot more respect than the braindead aggro matchup but...
Nothing get close to the absolute intelectual and skill patamar of two glorious control master race titans fighting each other, the mental challenge, preparation, adapt capabilities and vastly superior strategy is something far beyond what a feeble mind of a dirty aggro peasant can understand.
I think yog box and dragon queen would like to have a word with u
If you don't mind the extremely important factor of whether you go first or second and how determining that is. Also the extremely impactful factor of the opening help on deciding who wins. Does that not change the mind.
Its important, and some games you just high roll or get high rolled. If I am honest only 1 in 5 games are actually interesting because either I high roll or the opponent high rolls. I think that is the case with all meta decks though and being able to get to that 1 in 5 game is probably also why I prefer aggro over control
I never felt like control had any decision points it always felt like did they draw the removal if yes they win if no they lose. The control v aggro match ups mostly feel like pure rng. Except for some edge cases. But the control v control match ups also always felt like only 1 or two decisions actually mattered
I am an aggro player mostly in wild. generally my favorite deck is pirate warrior with burn shaman as a close second. The current disco lock and mech hunter are also in my top fun decks.
I finally realized why this is the case. The aggro v aggro mirror is so fast, so intense, and so skill testing it just does not get any better. You have to identify every turn if you are the control or the beat down and it switches multiple times per game, you have to identify what the opponent is trying to set up for on a turn by turn basis and then set up to counter it. I just lost a close match against odd demon hunter followed by a win in a close match against mech hunter. both games were incredibly exciting and interesting and almost every turn had 5 or 6 major decision points. (Games were at Diamond 6 btw)
I think yog box and dragon queen would like to have a word with u
Its important, and some games you just high roll or get high rolled. If I am honest only 1 in 5 games are actually interesting because either I high roll or the opponent high rolls. I think that is the case with all meta decks though and being able to get to that 1 in 5 game is probably also why I prefer aggro over control
I never felt like control had any decision points it always felt like did they draw the removal if yes they win if no they lose. The control v aggro match ups mostly feel like pure rng. Except for some edge cases. But the control v control match ups also always felt like only 1 or two decisions actually mattered
I am an aggro player mostly in wild. generally my favorite deck is pirate warrior with burn shaman as a close second. The current disco lock and mech hunter are also in my top fun decks.
I finally realized why this is the case. The aggro v aggro mirror is so fast, so intense, and so skill testing it just does not get any better. You have to identify every turn if you are the control or the beat down and it switches multiple times per game, you have to identify what the opponent is trying to set up for on a turn by turn basis and then set up to counter it. I just lost a close match against odd demon hunter followed by a win in a close match against mech hunter. both games were incredibly exciting and interesting and almost every turn had 5 or 6 major decision points. (Games were at Diamond 6 btw)