Edwin isn't a broken card he a high condition and an all in card in most metas's.
Usually you commit, If youropponent has a hard removal or silence you just lose as the rogue.
If there is a problem right now, in this meta, it the lackey issue that allows for 30/30+ Edwin's and the rogue still has a full hand. But that late in the game, being a good opponent you should know "every" rogue has am Edwin and save removal for him.
And as an astute rogue play, both of my favorite decks did NOT run Edwin. DR devilsuar combo, and the Original underfed kingbane.
Maricel rogue also had no use for Edwin and neither do Odd rogue.
The issue isn't Edwin in this meta, its 0mana hands and infinite lackeys with 0-1mana spells combined with players that hold removal.
If you think you're losing to Edwin is the problem you should go reflect on your own play.
Edwin isn't a broken card he a high condition and an all in card in most metas's.
Usually you commit, If youropponent has a hard removal or silence you just lose as the rogue.
If there is a problem right now, in this meta, it the lackey issue that allows for 30/30+ Edwin's and the rogue still has a full hand. But that late in the game, being a good opponent you should know "every" rogue has am Edwin and save removal for him.
And as an astute rogue play, both of my favorite decks did NOT run Edwin. DR devilsuar combo, and the Original underfed kingbane.
Maricel rogue also had no use for Edwin and neither do Odd rogue.
The issue isn't Edwin in this meta, its 0mana hands and infinite lackeys with 0-1mana spells combined with players that hold removal.
If you think you're losing to Edwin is the problem you should go reflect on your own play.