Get a life,play less on pc (especially this game) and all will work out also use salt thread instead making new ones.
Have a nice life
+1 for most useless reply to a thread I've seen in a while. Well played Kaiser. I could suggest you get yourself a life and stop wasting your time trolling forums
------------------------------------------------
OP - are these games where you're playing one or both Albatross'? Theoretically there should be a major difference between the success rate of 1 vs 2 as that requires 1 vs 3 draws to unf*&^ the highlanderness of the deck. One strategy (as it seems you employed) is duplicating the BLA to get more disruption in the deck. Alternatively timing when you play it to most likely disrupt big plays like Reno or Dragonqueen (but of course you need to play it then kill it so it's a bit slow in that regard).
I know personally I distinctly remember every time I've been f&#$ed over, and pretty much none of the times I get a ridiculous top deck. I track a lot of stats, and I've been contemplating how I could track results of GK/Dragonqueen draws etc. It gets messy though.
There's a good chance you're applying negativity bias to the sample size. Unless you have recorded hard stats of every single game, it's likely not as bad as you remember it. I can definitely empathise with what you're saying though as I've been through it all myself.
+1 for most useless reply to a thread I've seen in a while. Well played Kaiser. I could suggest you get yourself a life and stop wasting your time trolling forums
------------------------------------------------
OP - are these games where you're playing one or both Albatross'? Theoretically there should be a major difference between the success rate of 1 vs 2 as that requires 1 vs 3 draws to unf*&^ the highlanderness of the deck. One strategy (as it seems you employed) is duplicating the BLA to get more disruption in the deck. Alternatively timing when you play it to most likely disrupt big plays like Reno or Dragonqueen (but of course you need to play it then kill it so it's a bit slow in that regard).
I know personally I distinctly remember every time I've been f&#$ed over, and pretty much none of the times I get a ridiculous top deck. I track a lot of stats, and I've been contemplating how I could track results of GK/Dragonqueen draws etc. It gets messy though.
There's a good chance you're applying negativity bias to the sample size. Unless you have recorded hard stats of every single game, it's likely not as bad as you remember it. I can definitely empathise with what you're saying though as I've been through it all myself.
https://www.psycom.net/negativity-bias