What deck are you guys playing that can’t deal with Druid? There are plenty of classes that have hard counters to them (priest, warrior shaman and warlock just off the top of my head) and several neutral techs (creatures can get around evasive). Druid doesn’t need nerfs, players just need to learn to make a few tech slots in their net deck to deal with whatever deck of the week they are facing that week.
I think it has more to do with Embiggen into Breath of Dreams. The playing those early basically shoots up your win % massively, same deal with Ancharr.
I think it is losing argument to say that when a deck draws well, it wins more games and this is problematic. I think just about every deck has that characteristic. If you draw high cost cards early, your win percentage goes down. Embiggen into breath is strong, but embiggen at the bottom of the deck isn’t. The current Druid deck is a response to the hunter and rogue meta we have had, as aggro doesn’t do well against big taunts and life gain while rogue lacks multi-target removal and non-targeted removal. Play a deck that counters that strategy or at least tech in some extra removal or silence. Hard casting an expensive embiggen minion to have it silenced and Leeroy going face is just one way to punish the extremely greedy embiggen strategy.
I don't disagree with you, but win percentages are shooting up like 20% which means it's just a highroll deck and typically those are feel bad mechanics. It was the same reason they nerfed barnes in Wild. If you pulled that card it just basically won you the game, which doesn't feel interactive to play against.
What deck are you guys playing that can’t deal with Druid? There are plenty of classes that have hard counters to them (priest, warrior shaman and warlock just off the top of my head) and several neutral techs (creatures can get around evasive). Druid doesn’t need nerfs, players just need to learn to make a few tech slots in their net deck to deal with whatever deck of the week they are facing that week.
I think it has more to do with Embiggen into Breath of Dreams. The playing those early basically shoots up your win % massively, same deal with Ancharr.
It doesn't have an insane win rate, but also doesn't have many bad matchups. Even the bad matchups are still very winnable. The issue with it is the 70% win rate mulligan cards, which was almost the exact same as Ancharr, which is why they nerfed it. I'm sure the meta will adjust around it and they won't do nerfs until after the whole adventure is out, if at all.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
I don't disagree with you, but win percentages are shooting up like 20% which means it's just a highroll deck and typically those are feel bad mechanics. It was the same reason they nerfed barnes in Wild. If you pulled that card it just basically won you the game, which doesn't feel interactive to play against.
I think it has more to do with Embiggen into Breath of Dreams. The playing those early basically shoots up your win % massively, same deal with Ancharr.
It doesn't have an insane win rate, but also doesn't have many bad matchups. Even the bad matchups are still very winnable. The issue with it is the 70% win rate mulligan cards, which was almost the exact same as Ancharr, which is why they nerfed it. I'm sure the meta will adjust around it and they won't do nerfs until after the whole adventure is out, if at all.