Slyde, my commiserations about the new nerfs. Who knew Blizzard would be sending so much work your way in the space of a couple months!? Good luck with the reassignments when they come.
Zihi seems more universally applicable, and will probably have a longer meta life than Hakkar. Once Waggle rotates, Hakkar might find quite a bit more trouble finding a deck. Mechathun seems better for an otk style deck if that's what you want.
Seconded Baku. Velen is likely dead post rotation due to all the resurrection cards rotating out. Baku will be better for longer, and if you have any interest in wild it will be permanently powerful. It's also more likely to be nerfed in my opinion, so could be a free craft.
Tier One are meta defining legendaries, and as a result is subject to a lot of movement regarding what deck is working at what time.
Tier Two are cards with high winrates but not essential to any deck in the meta, they're seen more as 'tech' thus the name.
Tier Three are cards that don't have a home, but are decent nonetheless.
Tier Four are cards that have a home in typically low winrate decks. The fact that they have a home means they aren't trash.
Tier Five are cards with low winrates and no decks associated with them.
At least that's how I consider it. Perhaps you should take this list as a guideline, a pretty accurate one at that despite your complaints.
Bear in mind as well you attack Garrosh for it's low playrate, which you back up with personal anecdote, whereas Slyde is arguing from a winrate perspective. So much for objectivity.
On a final note, consider reading disclaimers:
'Disclaimer: A tier list like this can never please everyone; the meta game is dynamic. If you think a card is in the wrong tier, please explain and provide links to deck lists or other data to support your claim.'
Why Thekal & Shirvallah were in the tier 1? Exodia or Holy Wrath don't make it to tier 1 deck based on hsreplay.
The decks have very nice play and winrates, and I think they are smart crafts as they won't rotate soon and have a lot of potential for future synergies.
Re Bwonsamdi, I'll just say I bloody knew it. Don't know why it was rated high by some of the youtubers. Hopefully the effect will be unique enough that it has some application elsewhere.
So excluding Reno, Kazakus and Kruul (rarely ever played in the deck), Renolocks tend to have the following:
Flex legendaries are:
It's an expensive deck, and at the moment it isn't too well placed in the meta. But if you want to go for it, go for it.
Slyde, my commiserations about the new nerfs. Who knew Blizzard would be sending so much work your way in the space of a couple months!? Good luck with the reassignments when they come.
Zihi seems more universally applicable, and will probably have a longer meta life than Hakkar. Once Waggle rotates, Hakkar might find quite a bit more trouble finding a deck. Mechathun seems better for an otk style deck if that's what you want.
Seconded Baku. Velen is likely dead post rotation due to all the resurrection cards rotating out. Baku will be better for longer, and if you have any interest in wild it will be permanently powerful. It's also more likely to be nerfed in my opinion, so could be a free craft.
Tier One are meta defining legendaries, and as a result is subject to a lot of movement regarding what deck is working at what time.
Tier Two are cards with high winrates but not essential to any deck in the meta, they're seen more as 'tech' thus the name.
Tier Three are cards that don't have a home, but are decent nonetheless.
Tier Four are cards that have a home in typically low winrate decks. The fact that they have a home means they aren't trash.
Tier Five are cards with low winrates and no decks associated with them.
At least that's how I consider it. Perhaps you should take this list as a guideline, a pretty accurate one at that despite your complaints.
Bear in mind as well you attack Garrosh for it's low playrate, which you back up with personal anecdote, whereas Slyde is arguing from a winrate perspective. So much for objectivity.
On a final note, consider reading disclaimers:
'Disclaimer: A tier list like this can never please everyone; the meta game is dynamic. If you think a card is in the wrong tier, please explain and provide links to deck lists or other data to support your claim.'
I'll take that as a compliment then shall I? :P
Hi, should Cloning Gallery be moved into Tier 1? Since after all it is a centrepiece of a highly competitive deck.
Be prepared to tank Kingsbane, Shudderwock and any Druid Legendary.
Hi, just a quick note. Loti is not in Boomsday.
Re Bwonsamdi, I'll just say I bloody knew it. Don't know why it was rated high by some of the youtubers. Hopefully the effect will be unique enough that it has some application elsewhere.
Such a joke, I've got 5 legos from the Boomsday, 3 of which are Dr. Morrigan, Harbinger Celestia and Zerek.
Name isn't confirmed as far as I know, but the misspelling is rather ironic.
Hi, sorry to do this again. Did you mean Dr Boom, Mad Genius?
Digging the new rhyme for tier 4 list, but did you perhaps mean 'niches'?
How do we feel about bumping Captain Greenskin to tier 2? Sees play in both odd and kingsbane rogue, and makes appearances in pirate warrior.