⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/997733-kolento-oakheart-armor-control-warrior-69-wr
As it has been confirmed numerous times, this is a deck that claims to have been built and played by Kolento on his stream.
It is obviusly a troll deck from 4chan.
However my main concern is, that not so smart players are falling for this - and wasting their hard earned dust.
So the question is - why is Hearthpwn not deleting the troll deck that is the main Warrior deck because of so many upvotes?
Why should they use red-pencil on their own site? Are you from North Korea?
(sorry)
Playing Hearthstone since Oct 2015. Favourite class: Warlock.
Aaaand I have 99 skills, but the english language ain't one. :D
It is their own faul to get tricked like this actually.
Legend with : S65 Freeze Mage, S57 Maly Gonk Druid, S57 "Okay" Shaman, S53 Boom-zooka Hunter, S53 Maly Tog Druid, S52 Wild Tog Druid ft.Blingtron, S50 Quest Rogue, S49 Dead Man's Warrior, S41 Wild Clown Fiesta Druid, S41 Hadronox Jade Druid, S40 Wild OTK Dragon Druid, S35 SMOrc Shaman, S33 Jade Druid, S22 Control Priest, S19 Control Priest
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Card Design ChampionThere have been other troll decks in the past which Hearthpwn allowed to remain, so why should they delete this?
In fact, I'm glad for the existence of troll decks like this. People should learn to grow some brains and think for themselves, instead of blindly copying whatever netdeck has the most upvotes.
Moreover, as troll decks go, this isn't too bad - it is a reasonable control decklist with an ok curve. And two of the three legendaries are actually perfectly viable in competitive play.
I wouldnt normally care but the deck has too many upvotes to be simply ignores like that
It is going to be there the entire expansion and takes a slot on the main site for really good decks if nothing happens.
Indeed, i agree that there should always be proof when a pro player is mentioned in the box.
Link to screen or videos in the description
If provenance is uncertain or impossible to prove, it could be written in the description, to avoid theft, but not in the pro player box.
We are on it, but it takes some research to be sure to do the right thing, and Flux and most senior mods are in the Americas time zones.
If you have more info to support the claim, we will follow this thread also.
Thanks!
Editor of the Heartpwn Legendary Crafting Guide:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/205920-legendary-tier-list-crafting-guide
Bad decks are fine, however false associations and begging for votes is not acceptable . False information has been removed from the deck, and it will be booted from the front page.
Here's the thread:
https://boards.fireden.net/vg/thread/198227557/#198251149
However I don't know if it should be removed... Kolento's name should be removed since it's not his, but the deck itself should stay
We proved our point. Nothing else needs to be said.