Cool site achievement! But I think it might be borked.
First, it shows me as being at 0/2500. I thought perhaps that meant it was only counting +1s after the achievement was added but I noticed several people had already earned it.
Second, a few people have earned it even though they don't appear to have met the requirements. For example, Snuxi only has 57 "Thanks". Not sure how Thanks translate to +1s but I'm assuming perhaps +1's are a subset of Thanks? Zelgraz is another. RegisKillbin is another. Anyway, doesn't seem to be working properly.
The achievement is citing specific decks that users have authored as the reason for earning the achievement. In reviewing those decks I think perhaps the achievement is totaling the +1s from the comments made on the deck and if that amount us over 2500 is award the deck author with the achievement.
The description for the achievement is confusing to say the least. Seems like a deck page is treated as a comment, so deck upvotes count toward this. I mean it is fine and all, but its not very intuitive and the description could use an improvement.
The description for the achievement is confusing to say the least. Seems like a deck page is treated as a comment, so deck upvotes count toward this. I mean it is fine and all, but its not very intuitive and the description could use an improvement.
I think you may be right.
LauraBF was awarded the achievement earlier today and the achievement cites this deck:
But that deck has only 60 upvotes and also had only 33 comments and nowhere near 2500 +1s on the deck comments. However, she has over 3000 upvotes across all her decks. Not sure why the system cited that particular deck but in any event I think you theory might be correct.
The description for the achievement is confusing to say the least. Seems like a deck page is treated as a comment, so deck upvotes count toward this. I mean it is fine and all, but its not very intuitive and the description could use an improvement.
I think you may be right.
LauraBF was awarded the achievement earlier today and the achievement cites this deck:
But that deck has only 60 upvotes and also had only 33 comments and nowhere near 2500 +1s on the deck comments. However, she has over 3000 upvotes across all her decks. Not sure why the system cited that particular deck but in any event I think you theory might be correct.
The cited deck is probably the last "comment" that got a person over the treshold.
Btw was anything changed about this today? Cause HorLukRos now doesnt seem to have "Now That's Community Value". I specifically remember he had it yesteday, cause i wanted to make a joke about him that with his 4k+ upvoted deck, he could also make the "That's Incredible!" with just one "post" very soon :D
That being said, this feels like an oversight, that the deck page counts towards this, since "Most Valuable User" seems almost pointless with "King of Decks" being a thing. Sure, "Most Valuable User" lets u have the upvotes be spread over several decks, but still. Either it is an oversight or the description text should be changed to make it clear that decks count as well.
For one, it's a cumulative total across your account so you could earn the achievement on a comment sitting at +2 if it makes you pass the threshold which is why that particular object would be linked.
Upon review, I discovered my mistake in setting the achievement up - I didn't include the entity type. It should have been set to comment and not left blank which is the reason why it's triggering off the wrong stuff.
For record's sake since I'm here:
Comments are defined as responses to news post, card database pages, guides, and decks.
Posts are defined as anything on the forums.
I'm going to be resetting the achievements. If you earned the achievement and weren't supposed to have it, you will not get it again.
Cool site achievement! But I think it might be borked.
First, it shows me as being at 0/2500. I thought perhaps that meant it was only counting +1s after the achievement was added but I noticed several people had already earned it.
Second, a few people have earned it even though they don't appear to have met the requirements. For example, Snuxi only has 57 "Thanks". Not sure how Thanks translate to +1s but I'm assuming perhaps +1's are a subset of Thanks? Zelgraz is another. RegisKillbin is another. Anyway, doesn't seem to be working properly.
Moved to Site Feedback & Support, it's not an Innkeeper issue. But yes something seems to be broken there.
Oops sorry - meant to post it here! Thanks!
The achievement is citing specific decks that users have authored as the reason for earning the achievement. In reviewing those decks I think perhaps the achievement is totaling the +1s from the comments made on the deck and if that amount us over 2500 is award the deck author with the achievement.
The description for the achievement is confusing to say the least. Seems like a deck page is treated as a comment, so deck upvotes count toward this. I mean it is fine and all, but its not very intuitive and the description could use an improvement.
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
For one, it's a cumulative total across your account so you could earn the achievement on a comment sitting at +2 if it makes you pass the threshold which is why that particular object would be linked.
Upon review, I discovered my mistake in setting the achievement up - I didn't include the entity type. It should have been set to comment and not left blank which is the reason why it's triggering off the wrong stuff.
For record's sake since I'm here:
I'm going to be resetting the achievements. If you earned the achievement and weren't supposed to have it, you will not get it again.
Thanks Flux! Though now I have a different problem. My achievement shows I'm at 2636 of 2500 but haven't heard the achievement. :(
Actually, I'm guessing I need to have a new comment get a +1 before it will trigger the achievement? right?
PS: Yep, that was it!
That'd do it! I've got the same problemo.