Hunter Rush. My eventual goal is to get a top-ranking mage deck to legendary (ala trump), but no point in playing control when it's all about volume of games on the ladder, getting up to rank 5 anyway.
Edit: Nothing pleases me more than to crush all those scrubby ass people with 9 legendaries as I rush them down. Of course once I hit the wall of druids with 19 legendaries then I start losing, but that's when I know I'll have to switch to a better deck (armor warrior possibly)
You really don't know what your talking about
I have zero legendaries and make it to rank 5 easily, topping out at rank 3 with my hunter deck. Don't have the cards to compete with the 19 legendary druid decks at the moment to push into legendary. So what exactly do I not know?
Btw - yes, rank 3 WITHOUT Leeroy. I know what I'm doing. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Legendary cards don't mean anything... Playing a faceroll huntard deck tells me you DO NOT know what are your doing and the fact that you don't have legendary cards makes you a total noob actually because it only takes a bit of time and devotion to get a good deck
That argument is just as weak as his. Not owning legendaries doesn't imply you're a 'total noob', it might just mean one just recently started playing or doesn't have the time/impetus to farm the cards. There's a number of decks that perform fairly well without using a single legendary.
A newbie is a beginner, a n00b is someone who's been at it a while but is a complete donkey. So it is a derogatory term.
Anyway, I'm a bit of both. Not playing long, and not really getting far atm. But I do have legends, managed to luck some, inc golden versions, in packs earned from arena play. I got a golden Ysera from a 1-3 run pack. I also dust all the crap I don't use or want, save until i have enough for other legends.
You don't have to spend, nor be very good, to have legend cards.
Legendary cards don't mean anything... Playing a faceroll huntard deck tells me you DO NOT know what are your doing and the fact that you don't have legendary cards makes you a total noob actually because it only takes a bit of time and devotion to get a good deck
Statements like this say much more about you than it does about me. Is rank 3-5 not having a "good deck"? I would say getting to rank three means my deck isn't a elite deck, but certainly is a good deck.
Anyway I just switched to the zoo deck and am currently romping my way up the ladder even faster than before. Perhaps I will get to run all over you on my way to legend this season :D.
Hunter Rush. My eventual goal is to get a top-ranking mage deck to legendary (ala trump), but no point in playing control when it's all about volume of games on the ladder, getting up to rank 5 anyway.
Edit: Nothing pleases me more than to crush all those scrubby ass people with 9 legendaries as I rush them down. Of course once I hit the wall of druids with 19 legendaries then I start losing, but that's when I know I'll have to switch to a better deck (armor warrior possibly)
You really don't know what your talking about
I have zero legendaries and make it to rank 5 easily, topping out at rank 3 with my hunter deck. Don't have the cards to compete with the 19 legendary druid decks at the moment to push into legendary. So what exactly do I not know?
Btw - yes, rank 3 WITHOUT Leeroy. I know what I'm doing. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Legendary cards don't mean anything... Playing a faceroll huntard deck tells me you DO NOT know what are your doing and the fact that you don't have legendary cards makes you a total noob actually because it only takes a bit of time and devotion to get a good deck
That argument is just as weak as his. Not owning legendaries doesn't imply you're a 'total noob', it might just mean one just recently started playing or doesn't have the time/impetus to farm the cards. There's a number of decks that perform fairly well without using a single legendary.
I think it's the state of the game and himself (he doesn't want to farm slowly for cards) that let him chose hunter. But he deserves the hate because he is laddering with one of the most skilled deck of all times.
Off topic: SeatTournament is taking place. Savjz swarmed with murlock but Strifecro topdecked Swipe. LoL.
Hunter Rush. My eventual goal is to get a top-ranking mage deck to legendary (ala trump), but no point in playing control when it's all about volume of games on the ladder, getting up to rank 5 anyway.
Edit: Nothing pleases me more than to crush all those scrubby ass people with 9 legendaries as I rush them down. Of course once I hit the wall of druids with 19 legendaries then I start losing, but that's when I know I'll have to switch to a better deck (armor warrior possibly)
You really don't know what your talking about
I have zero legendaries and make it to rank 5 easily, topping out at rank 3 with my hunter deck. Don't have the cards to compete with the 19 legendary druid decks at the moment to push into legendary. So what exactly do I not know?
Btw - yes, rank 3 WITHOUT Leeroy. I know what I'm doing. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Legendary cards don't mean anything... Playing a faceroll huntard deck tells me you DO NOT know what are your doing and the fact that you don't have legendary cards makes you a total noob actually because it only takes a bit of time and devotion to get a good deck
That argument is just as weak as his. Not owning legendaries doesn't imply you're a 'total noob', it might just mean one just recently started playing or doesn't have the time/impetus to farm the cards. There's a number of decks that perform fairly well without using a single legendary.
I think it's the state of the game and himself (he doesn't want to farm slowly for cards) that let him chose hunter. But he deserves the hate because he is laddering with one of the most skilled deck of all times.
Yeah I really don't want to make this thread about trash conversations like this, yes the deck is strong but it is only changing the way that everyone players the game which is not very good for HearthStone.
ahh when I do warlock quests I make a Mid-Ranged Warlock I called it tension warlock! :) very fun! I doubt that will happen the Zoo deck is very easy to counter for my main ladder decks :P but it is strong none the less!
Hunter Rush. My eventual goal is to get a top-ranking mage deck to legendary (ala trump), but no point in playing control when it's all about volume of games on the ladder, getting up to rank 5 anyway.
Edit: Nothing pleases me more than to crush all those scrubby ass people with 9 legendaries as I rush them down. Of course once I hit the wall of druids with 19 legendaries then I start losing, but that's when I know I'll have to switch to a better deck (armor warrior possibly)
You really don't know what your talking about
I have zero legendaries and make it to rank 5 easily, topping out at rank 3 with my hunter deck. Don't have the cards to compete with the 19 legendary druid decks at the moment to push into legendary. So what exactly do I not know?
Btw - yes, rank 3 WITHOUT Leeroy. I know what I'm doing. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Legendary cards don't mean anything... Playing a faceroll huntard deck tells me you DO NOT know what are your doing and the fact that you don't have legendary cards makes you a total noob actually because it only takes a bit of time and devotion to get a good deck
That argument is just as weak as his. Not owning legendaries doesn't imply you're a 'total noob', it might just mean one just recently started playing or doesn't have the time/impetus to farm the cards. There's a number of decks that perform fairly well without using a single legendary.
I think it's the state of the game and himself (he doesn't want to farm slowly for cards) that let him chose hunter. But he deserves the hate because he is laddering with one of the most skilled deck of all times.
If a deck is successful, it's understandable that people run it because all that matters (to most of the competitive players) is winning. It's not the fault of the player but the game allowing the existence of decks that win by completely ignoring the board.
Yeah, I am not to sure about running him it seems like burst/reach is not need to much with the deck.
I like AoW I always have.
Yeah seems fine but I do like slams
For sure, meta changes fast I got to legend with Rogue Druid and Paladin in season 1.
I think it's absolutely needed tho. There are so many games I watched in twitch where Tides made misplay but he win outright in the end by combo Alex+Gorehowl+Gromash. It's just insane.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
That argument is just as weak as his. Not owning legendaries doesn't imply you're a 'total noob', it might just mean one just recently started playing or doesn't have the time/impetus to farm the cards. There's a number of decks that perform fairly well without using a single legendary.
Yes recently started play (A Noob) becasue it means new player.
A newbie is a beginner, a n00b is someone who's been at it a while but is a complete donkey. So it is a derogatory term.
Anyway, I'm a bit of both. Not playing long, and not really getting far atm. But I do have legends, managed to luck some, inc golden versions, in packs earned from arena play. I got a golden Ysera from a 1-3 run pack. I also dust all the crap I don't use or want, save until i have enough for other legends.
You don't have to spend, nor be very good, to have legend cards.
Statements like this say much more about you than it does about me. Is rank 3-5 not having a "good deck"? I would say getting to rank three means my deck isn't a elite deck, but certainly is a good deck.
Anyway I just switched to the zoo deck and am currently romping my way up the ladder even faster than before. Perhaps I will get to run all over you on my way to legend this season :D.
I think it's the state of the game and himself (he doesn't want to farm slowly for cards) that let him chose hunter. But he deserves the hate because he is laddering with one of the most skilled deck of all times.
Off topic: SeatTournament is taking place. Savjz swarmed with murlock but Strifecro topdecked Swipe. LoL.
Well imo it does not take skill to play
Yeah I really don't want to make this thread about trash conversations like this, yes the deck is strong but it is only changing the way that everyone players the game which is not very good for HearthStone.
ahh when I do warlock quests I make a Mid-Ranged Warlock I called it tension warlock! :) very fun! I doubt that will happen the Zoo deck is very easy to counter for my main ladder decks :P but it is strong none the less!
gl!
Made fun of him. #sacarsm
If a deck is successful, it's understandable that people run it because all that matters (to most of the competitive players) is winning. It's not the fault of the player but the game allowing the existence of decks that win by completely ignoring the board.
Yeah, I am not to sure about running him it seems like burst/reach is not need to much with the deck.
I like AoW I always have.
Yeah seems fine but I do like slams
For sure, meta changes fast I got to legend with Rogue Druid and Paladin in season 1.
I think it's absolutely needed tho. There are so many games I watched in twitch where Tides made misplay but he win outright in the end by combo Alex+Gorehowl+Gromash. It's just insane.