Hearthpwn

I'm a druid player and Face Hunter is probably the easiest deck to face.  I love when i see i'm matched up against a hunter;  I haven't lost to that deck in the longest time.  I think Handlock/Demonlock is a much lamer deck and totally not fun to play against. Let me use my hero power drop a twilight w 9 health then use no skill at all to win the match.  Much less skill involved in hand lock than Face Hunter IMO.

Less skill involved in handlock??? Anyway what I say next only applies to me (so I don't know why other people have issues with it). I don't like face hunters because they ignore everything I do and just throw their cards at my hero trying to kill me before turn 6, if a face hunter ever reacts to what you play it is only because it is preventing face damage. If I wanted an opponent that would just ignore everything I do and go face then I'd just play a modded version of Practice mode where the AI has to go around everything to deal more face damage. It is bland, it is frustrating and it is boring. Not saying that other decks are not like that but you asked specifically about Face Hunter.

The deck that's an easy matchup is nothing wrong with. But the deck I lose to is unfair and only dumb people play that.

The problem with Face Hunter is that it makes it difficult to come up with and tune decks. Oh, you want to try out that new control warlock deck you've just come up with? Too bad, dead by turn 5. Didn't draw that healbot in time? Dead again. Its a deck that heavily limits the design of new decks, and overall just creates stale, repetitive games that no one really enjoys.

Quote from Rywal21 jump

I'm a druid player and Face Hunter is probably the easiest deck to face.  I love when i see i'm matched up against a hunter;  I haven't lost to that deck in the longest time.  I think Handlock/Demonlock is a much lamer deck and totally not fun to play against. Let me use my hero power drop a twilight w 9 health then use no skill at all to win the match.  Much less skill involved in hand lock than Face Hunter IMO.

Seriously buddy... much less skill involved in Handlock?? I guarantee you that you wouldn't stand a chance of mustering up the skill required to play Handlock properly. And please PLEASE do tell us what skills are needed to play face hunter!!1 How could anything possibly take less skill than something that requires no skill whatsoever. Honestly, I believe it's exactly 0% skill unless you come up against another Tard, in which case some skill should be administered, but I imagine you both just shit the bed trying to face each other down, whoever draws better wins, no skill.

I don't mind the existence of aggro decks, it's good to have the variety, problem is just how strong they are. There's nearly no such thing as drawing badly, and they are EVERYWHERE, ruining the game for people who like to pit their wits against another wit pitter. I can honestly imagine that if Blizzard don't do something to fix the overwhelming amount of retards playing face decks, a lot of the more serious, and skilled players will stop playing the game, due to a lack of motivation, just facing the same trash day in and day out. Then you guys will have great fun playing the same 60 cards against each other eternally I'm sure.

God I HATE IT!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote from Funckle jump

The deck that's an easy matchup is nothing wrong with. But the deck I lose to is unfair and only dumb people play that.

Is this a joke? I'm not sure if you are serious or just want to look serious while mocking people that say this. :/

The only difficult part of facehunter is deciding when to trade instead of face.

To me it's the benchmark other decks are measured against because it used to be so widespread (read: cancerous).

If your deck can't beat it, you might as well not ladder at all. Teching for control is one thing but losing to aggro just 'feelsbadman.'

Troll or not, please use the Search function before starting a new thread.

http://www.hearthpwn.com/search?search=why hate face