Kripparian talked about bad cards and Ben Brode gave a video response. I thought it was pretty interesting. They were talking about the very existence of bad cards and why they exist and why old cards shouldn't be buffed. I feel like the topic of this thread has drifted some but its still on the existence of good and bad cards. One of Ben Brode comments that I really liked was that the introduction of bad cards introduces a lot of discussion (like what's happening now :) ) about why cards are good and bad, and thats good for the community. It allows new and experienced players to communicate more and thats good for the game.
Yup, Larnok. If you look closely, I actually linked that video on the post u_u hahahaha
@Rem~, I give up dude, you keep making points against things I never said.
I'm trying to push the debate over new points. Of course you never said those things lol... I'm bringing them to the table. If you want to argue only over what you brought..., it's not the place.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Used to be a proud Handlock player.
Legend 17 times.
Still flirting with the ladder from times to times with Renolock.
I still reckon there'll be a card that reads "your next hero power is free". That and/or a card with Battlecry: inspire all ally minions as was suggested above would bring a whole new spin to the inspire mechanic. Time will tell.
what I dont understand is all this speculation with so little revealed, also the strongest cards are usually the class cards and for the most part they are still not revealed the only bad class card I can think of is ball of spiders.
they dont need to release 120 "OP" cards they need to release playable cards.
And if you people thought that cards like belcher,chow,undertaker were bad before naxx release it's your problem that you weren't able to see it , it's not a reason to believe every shit card has potential and forgive Blizz for their laziness.
Kripparian talked about bad cards and Ben Brode gave a video response. I thought it was pretty interesting. They were talking about the very existence of bad cards and why they exist and why old cards shouldn't be buffed. I feel like the topic of this thread has drifted some but its still on the existence of good and bad cards. One of Ben Brode comments that I really liked was that the introduction of bad cards introduces a lot of discussion (like what's happening now :) ) about why cards are good and bad, and thats good for the community. It allows new and experienced players to communicate more and thats good for the game.
Yup, Larnok. If you look closely, I actually linked that video on the post u_u hahahaha
@Rem~, I give up dude, you keep making points against things I never said.
I'm trying to push the debate over new points. Of course you never said those things lol... I'm bringing them to the table. If you want to argue only over what you brought..., it's not the place.
Used to be a proud Handlock player.
Legend 17 times.
Still flirting with the ladder from times to times with Renolock.
There would be point for this topic if we would already know that there is no synergy with this "bad" card.
I still reckon there'll be a card that reads "your next hero power is free". That and/or a card with Battlecry: inspire all ally minions as was suggested above would bring a whole new spin to the inspire mechanic. Time will tell.
Ibn Fahd.
Ooops, I didn't see that. Sorry bro :p
what I dont understand is all this speculation with so little revealed, also the strongest cards are usually the class cards and for the most part they are still not revealed the only bad class card I can think of is ball of spiders.
Arena > all
Perhaps you should read this: http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr5