Im really having fun with beast hunter, using call pet to drop 1 mana kodos or 2 mana highmanes is awesome....am I a scumbag or are face hunters the only hated ones?
You are the honorable exception :)
There are a few of us. I really hated playing hunter as it was so mindless, so I went and built a midrange beast hunter that I really like. It still has a lot of aspects of face hunter, like charging beasts out with a Rhino and what not. It's not control, but it's way slower than face hunter but I think more sustainable. Very tempo based.
Oh, but I suck a lot soooooo, yeah maybe not the best idea to play what I play lol.
Im really having fun with beast hunter, using call pet to drop 1 mana kodos or 2 mana highmanes is awesome....am I a scumbag or are face hunters the only hated ones?
You are the honorable exception :)
There are a few of us. I really hated playing hunter as it was so mindless, so I went and built a midrange beast hunter that I really like. It still has a lot of aspects of face hunter, like charging beasts out with a Rhino and what not. It's not control, but it's way slower than face hunter but I think more sustainable. Very tempo based.
Oh, but I suck a lot soooooo, yeah maybe not the best idea to play what I play lol.
My Midrange Beast deck is really fun...the only non beast minions I run is 1 Cult Master, 1 BGH (wich I may end up cutting from the deck), and 2x Houndmaster, because ofc. 1 Call Pet has worked wonders, I just got a turn 1 Coin + Call Pet into a turn 2 Savannah Highmane :) and if I dont get a beast, its a 2 mana cycle card, not THAT bad. Also getting a 1 mana Stampeding Kodo is really good vs Face hunters, zoo, shamans and specially Mech Mage. The deck also catches people off guard, no one is expecting a deck with King Mukla, King Krush (turn 5 Krush gg) and Cult Master + Snake Trap or Unleash the Hounds
Im really having fun with beast hunter, using call pet to drop 1 mana kodos or 2 mana highmanes is awesome....am I a scumbag or are face hunters the only hated ones?
You are the honorable exception :)
There are a few of us. I really hated playing hunter as it was so mindless, so I went and built a midrange beast hunter that I really like. It still has a lot of aspects of face hunter, like charging beasts out with a Rhino and what not. It's not control, but it's way slower than face hunter but I think more sustainable. Very tempo based.
Oh, but I suck a lot soooooo, yeah maybe not the best idea to play what I play lol.
My Midrange Beast deck is really fun...the only non beast minions I run is 1 Cult Master, 1 BGH (wich I may end up cutting from the deck), and 2x Houndmaster, because ofc. 1 Call Pet has worked wonders, I just got a turn 1 Coin + Call Pet into a turn 2 Savannah Highmane :) and if I dont get a beast, its a 2 mana cycle card, not THAT bad. Also gettin a 1 mana Stampeding Kodo is really good vs Face hunters, zoo, shamans and specially Mech Mage. The deck also catches people off guard, no one is expecting a deck with King Mukla, King Krush and Cult Master + Snake Trap or Unleash the Hounds
It's funny that in every hunter topic some people come whining about hunter doesn't require any skill. It's one of the most stupid comments I've seen on hearthpwn.
Yes there are decks that are more difficult to play but a lot of the decks played basically do the same thing all the time.
Hunter is way more difficult than people think (at least if you want to get legend), because you play an aggro deck the room for error is marginal and because a lot of players play it, you've to outskill them in mirror matches. Also people will tech against your deck a lot.
It's funny that in every hunter topic some people come whining about hunter doesn't require any skill. It's one of the most stupid comments I've seen on hearthpwn.
Yes there are decks that are more difficult to play but a lot of the decks played basically do the same thing all the time.
Hunter is way more difficult than people think (at least if you want to get legend), because you play an aggro deck the room for error is marginal and because a lot of players play it, you've to outskill them in mirror matches. Also people will tech against your deck a lot.
This is wrong and this post should be removed. As a Hunter you make less decisions on smart trading since your going face. Similar to a Mech Mage. In another words, its an ALL offensive deck. While you are correct is stating that there is little room for error, there is also MUCH less chance of error since the class does not have any well developed defensive strategies, decks and play. Much less decision making is required.
Cheapest competitive deck is the most common. How come?
If skill command, unleash the skill and eagleskill bow would be epics and glavezooka would be a legendary (pretty much no one is playing more than one anyway) you would see much much much less hunters on ladder. MUCH LESS
My experience is that while you can fly through the lower ranks with Hunter, it is not the case at the higher ranks. I always had more success with midrange or control decks there. It is simply easier to win with them even if people say it takes more skill.
It's funny that in every hunter topic some people come whining about hunter doesn't require any skill. It's one of the most stupid comments I've seen on hearthpwn.
Yes there are decks that are more difficult to play but a lot of the decks played basically do the same thing all the time.
Hunter is way more difficult than people think (at least if you want to get legend), because you play an aggro deck the room for error is marginal and because a lot of players play it, you've to outskill them in mirror matches. Also people will tech against your deck a lot.
This is wrong and this post should be removed. As a Hunter you make less decisions on smart trading since your going face. Similar to a Mech Mage. In another words, its an ALL offensive deck. While you are correct is stating that there is little room for error, there is also MUCH less chance of error since the class does not have any well developed defensive strategies, decks and play. Much less decision making is required.
Just go live in North Korea if you want censorship.
It doesn't matter what decision you have to make, you should make the right ones and that just requires skills. The most played decks all do the same thing basically in most matches. Like control warrior is doing anything else than armoring up and drawing for their finishers.
Im really having fun with beast hunter, using call pet to drop 1 mana kodos or 2 mana highmanes is awesome....am I a scumbag or are face hunters the only hated ones?
For the time being anyone running Call Pet seems to be exempt (since that card actually requires you to have a decent number of mid-late game options for it to be of any use).
Personally I like the 0-mana Snapjaws the most, followed by the 1-mana buzzard. Nobody expects the Hound/Buzzard combo any more (with good reason, too - it's usually a horrible play).
I recently uploaded my new control hunter, its been doing me wonders; you should take a look at the full writeup if you want to know how to play against it:
this is apparently how you win on ladder, put 2 kezan mystics in your deck.
Yea this doesn't even help most of the time. Sometimes you never even draw them and they cost 4 mana, and they are worthless vs almost every other deck.
There are a few of us. I really hated playing hunter as it was so mindless, so I went and built a midrange beast hunter that I really like. It still has a lot of aspects of face hunter, like charging beasts out with a Rhino and what not. It's not control, but it's way slower than face hunter but I think more sustainable. Very tempo based.
Oh, but I suck a lot soooooo, yeah maybe not the best idea to play what I play lol.
My Midrange Beast deck is really fun...the only non beast minions I run is 1 Cult Master, 1 BGH (wich I may end up cutting from the deck), and 2x Houndmaster, because ofc. 1 Call Pet has worked wonders, I just got a turn 1 Coin + Call Pet into a turn 2 Savannah Highmane :) and if I dont get a beast, its a 2 mana cycle card, not THAT bad. Also getting a 1 mana Stampeding Kodo is really good vs Face hunters, zoo, shamans and specially Mech Mage. The deck also catches people off guard, no one is expecting a deck with King Mukla, King Krush (turn 5 Krush gg) and Cult Master + Snake Trap or Unleash the Hounds
I have neither mukla or king krush :(
Please refer to my previous comment.
It's funny that in every hunter topic some people come whining about hunter doesn't require any skill. It's one of the most stupid comments I've seen on hearthpwn.
Yes there are decks that are more difficult to play but a lot of the decks played basically do the same thing all the time.
Hunter is way more difficult than people think (at least if you want to get legend), because you play an aggro deck the room for error is marginal and because a lot of players play it, you've to outskill them in mirror matches. Also people will tech against your deck a lot.
This is wrong and this post should be removed. As a Hunter you make less decisions on smart trading since your going face. Similar to a Mech Mage. In another words, its an ALL offensive deck. While you are correct is stating that there is little room for error, there is also MUCH less chance of error since the class does not have any well developed defensive strategies, decks and play. Much less decision making is required.
Cheapest competitive deck is the most common. How come?
If skill command, unleash the skill and eagleskill bow would be epics and glavezooka would be a legendary (pretty much no one is playing more than one anyway) you would see much much much less hunters on ladder. MUCH LESS
My experience is that while you can fly through the lower ranks with Hunter, it is not the case at the higher ranks. I always had more success with midrange or control decks there. It is simply easier to win with them even if people say it takes more skill.
Just go live in North Korea if you want censorship.
It doesn't matter what decision you have to make, you should make the right ones and that just requires skills. The most played decks all do the same thing basically in most matches. Like control warrior is doing anything else than armoring up and drawing for their finishers.
They should just remove hunter from the game ;) That way we can tell apart who doesnt actually suck at TCGs
Hearthstone is a game of "copy and pasting"
Hahahahahaahahahahahah nice one mate!Nice one!You made me tear from laughs thank you!Damm that was a good joke i will tell it to my friends too! :D
For the time being anyone running Call Pet seems to be exempt (since that card actually requires you to have a decent number of mid-late game options for it to be of any use).
Personally I like the 0-mana Snapjaws the most, followed by the 1-mana buzzard. Nobody expects the Hound/Buzzard combo any more (with good reason, too - it's usually a horrible play).
Omagad, thank you, laughed my ass off :D
Yea this doesn't even help most of the time. Sometimes you never even draw them and they cost 4 mana, and they are worthless vs almost every other deck.
WIld Pyromancer + Coin
GG
DJ
Consider the number of people that Compare HS to Magic...
Hearthstone is a game of "copy and pasting"